Are any facts disputed?

[Truth Detector]

Shiff is trying to appear open minded until the end.

[canceled.2021.2]

I dispute all of the facts

[Truth Detector]

But what will remain are the facts revealed, that Trump sought to leverage Ukraine's need for aid against him attaining a personal "favor," that he asked a foreign entity to get involved in our elections, that he orchestrated a campaign to obtain his goals, etc., all issues the Democrats could use in 2020 to cement an image of Trump as unethical, dishonest, and untrustworthy

Those aren't facts; they are lie filled innuendo and hyperbole. If you weren't such a dishonest partisan hack, you would know the difference.

[Truth Detector]

If that makes you feel better but the reality train is chugging down the track!

This will be the only reality fools like you will be seeing in 2020:

[Truth Detector]

These people are expert witnesses, not fact witnesses. Do you understand the difference?

Witnesses to what? They keep calling these people witnesses; what did the witness??? Do you understand how stupid you look?

[Micawber]

There is only one sense in which any fact is disputed here, by mere thoughtless gainsaying.
Not quite as bad is the claim of insufficient proof of facts because Trump did not say:

"I will release the money if you announce an investigation of Burisma and Biden"

Instead it is known he said "You aren't doing enough, reciprocating ...and I want you to do us a favor. Investigate Burisma server, Biden yada yada"

I'm not sure there is a ray of light between those two, but that's what they are hanging their hat on.
And of course that slit is sealed when you take the sondland testimony, Taylor Testimony and Bolten statements that it was a drug deal and everyone was in on it and it was an understood quid pro quo.

[Truth Detector]

The facts Have already been outlined by the report adopted by the committee yesterday. These are expert witnesses not fact witnesses.

It’s like a bifurcated trial, the jury has already determined the facts by adopting yesterday‘s report. Today they are showing how those facts Equate to impeachment.

Witnesses to what? What did they witness?

[Truth Detector]

There is only one sense in which any fact is disputed here, by mere thoughtless gainsaying.
Not quite as bad is the claim of insufficient proof of facts because Trump did not say:

"I will release the money if you announce an investigation of Burisma and Biden"

He never said that. Why all the lies? Are you a minie-me Schiff?

Instead it is known he said "You aren't doing enough, reciprocating ...and I want you to do us a favor. Investigate Burisma server, Biden yada yada"

He never said that. Why all the lies? Are you a minie-me Schiff?

I'm not sure there is a ray of light between those two, but that's what they are hanging their hat on.
And of course that slit is sealed when you take the sondland testimony, and Bolten statements that it was a drug deal and everyone was in on it and it was an understood quid pro quo.

I am quite sure a ray of light would shine from ear to ear on you. There is nothing between them to stop it.

[jimmymccready]

^Obviously ignorant of what “high crimes and misdemeanors” means.

Dumbfuck.

Your comments demonstrate you are deliberately stupid as to what the phrase means.

[domer76]

Your comments demonstrate you are deliberately stupid as to what the phrase means.

Mine? Hardly.

What it DOESN’T mean is a criminal offense.

[christiefan915]

That is total and complete bull shit. You are desperate for anything!

It's some guy's opinion with nothing backing it up.

https://www.buzzsprout.com/164767/2174264

[Truth Detector]

Jarod on this thread:

[floridafan]

It's some guy's opinion with nothing backing it up.

https://www.buzzsprout.com/164767/2174264

I think you have gone desperate. Have you personally seen anything that would indicate impeachment is being abandoned. No, its full speed ahead

[christiefan915]

I think you have gone desperate. Have you personally seen anything that would indicate impeachment is being abandoned. No, its full speed ahead

I'm not following. Earl said that Adam Schiff was undecided about voting for impeachment and cited something called "buzzsprout.com" as his source. So I looked it up and it was just a podcaster's opinion with no source to Schiff. So IMO Earl was spouting B.S.

Tim Pool Daily Show

Democrats Have Started ABANDONING Impeachment, Even Adam Schiff Says He Is Not Sure

November 26, 2019 Season 1 Episode 191

[jimmymccready]

Earl is following some dude's opinion is all.