Prediction thread....Impeachment.

[Truth Detector]

Once again, why won't trump release the full transcript of the phone call.

He has. What part do you think is missing?

Surely if he is innocent, the call will back hi, up. Only the guilty have so much to hide.

Surely if he is NOT innocent, you could tell us what crimes he is guilty of. He gets the PRESUMPTION of innocence. The Constitution; read it.

Why won't he allow his people to testify in trumps defense?

He doesn't have to. They are subject to Executive privilege and one does not have to prove one's innocence. We do not live in the Fascistic, lawless third world shit hole Democrats want to turn us into.

[floridafan]

How far up your ass is your head? From CNN no less: https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/15/polit...all/index.html

Just what part of "rough transcript" do you not understand?

[StoneByStone]

There you go lying again. What is wrong with you leftists mental midgets? What law did Trump break?

He was too perfect. There is a law against perfection and Saint Trump broke it.

[Micawber]

Hey TRUMPTARDS SMART GUY WHO IS A JUDGE AND KNOWS MORE LAW THAN YOU AND AGREES WITH YOU POLITICALLY SAYS TRUMP IS A CRIMINAL WHO SHOULD BE IMPEACHED ON OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF TWO CRIMES.


Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano struck out at President Donald Trump’s decision to not send lawyers to an upcoming impeachment hearing, calling the move “very unwise.”
“I am curious what you make of the fact that the president might want to skip out on this Judiciary Committee opening hearing and maybe others to follow, because it is essentially a Kangaroo court or it’s not fair,” Neil Cavuto said on Your World Monday.
“The rules about which the president are complaining were written by a Republican House of Representatives in 2015. The president would be very unwise not to send lawyers there,” Napolitano responded.
“The Democrats are not doing anything that the Democrats did not do to Nixon or the Republicans didn’t do the Bill Clinton. But I think he makes a mistake when he refuses to participate. It is a valid vote by the House of Representatives that authorized this,” he continued. “He also loses the argument that it’s unfair if he doesn’t take the opportunity to participate himself.”
Napolitano again defended his belief that Trump’s actions have merited impeachment.
“In my view, it is clearly impeachable because it involves two potential crimes,” Napolitano said. “The crime of bribery … which is defined as the failure to do an official act, release the $391 million, until a favor comes your way: not conduct an investigation, announce the existence of an investigation of Joe Biden. The other crime is asking for campaign aide from a foreign national. That’s a crime in and of itself, just asking.”
“They are free to say that’s not an impeachable offense, but they are not free to say it didn’t happen, because the evidence that it happened is overwhelming,” he said.
Watch above, via Fox News.


Oops! That's going to sting

[Sailor]

Just what part of "rough transcript" do you not understand?

Have you read it? Of course not. This is what Democrats are basing their impeachment on. I guess they do not understand "rough transcript" either.

[Truth Detector]

There is NO transcript to read. You are a pathetic liar.

Yes there is. Here is the link for lazy dumbfucks like you:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-conten...ied09.2019.pdf

[Truth Detector]

Just what part of "rough transcript" do you not understand?

WTF is a "rough transcript." So now, the leftist lie is that this is not the REAL transcript. There is a "secret" one?

You sad, boorish, pathetic, lie filled leftist hack.

[Truth Detector]

He was too perfect. There is a law against perfection and Saint Trump broke it.

Absurdity; a sure sign of the last desperate refuge for liars, fools and ignorance; and those who have lost their arguments.

[Truth Detector]

Hey TRUMPTARDS SMART GUY WHO IS A JUDGE AND KNOWS MORE LAW THAN YOU AND AGREES WITH YOU POLITICALLY SAYS TRUMP IS A CRIMINAL WHO SHOULD BE IMPEACHED ON OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF TWO CRIMES.

What crimes shit-for-brains?

[floridafan]

[QUOTE=Truth Detector;3376278]He has. What part do you think is missing?



Surely if he is NOT innocent, you could tell us what crimes he is guilty of. He gets the PRESUMPTION of innocence. The Constitution; read it.



He doesn't have to. They are subject to Executive privilege and one does not have to prove one's innocence. We do not live in the Fascistic, lawless third world shit hole Democrats want to turn us into.[/QUOTWhat was released was a memorandum, do you have any clue as to what that is? In fact there was testimony at the Congressional hearings that parts of this MEMORANDUM have been altered.

Of course he doesn't have to allow his people to testify, its only the guilty who will not. Innocent people have nothing to hide.

[floridafan]

WTF is a "rough transcript." So now, the leftist lie is that this is not the REAL transcript. There is a "secret" one?

You sad, boorish, pathetic, lie filled leftist hack.

The actual transcript, if one ever existed has never been released. PERIOD.

[Truth Detector]

Have you read it? Of course not. This is what Democrats are basing their impeachment on. I guess they do not understand "rough transcript" either.

I guess if it says "MEMORANDUM OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION" it's not REALLY a transcript of the actual conversation.

[Sailor]

I guess if it says "MEMORANDUM OF TELEPHONE CONVERSATION" it's not REALLY a transcript of the actual conversation.

He/She/It, whatever the hell it is, is certainly not the brightest that is for sure!

[Truth Detector]

What was released was a memorandum, do you have any clue as to what that is? In fact there was testimony at the Congressional hearings that parts of this MEMORANDUM have been altered.

So the HEARSAY in the Clown Show Impeachment hearings trumps what was actually recorded. You sad, pathetic, lie filled partisan hack. How miserable you must be knowing that Trump will NEVER be convicted in the Senate and probably win another four years in 2020.

Of course he doesn't have to allow his people to testify, its only the guilty who will not. Innocent people have nothing to hide.

Presumption of innocence: The Constitution; READ it.

[Truth Detector]

The actual transcript, if one ever existed has never been released. PERIOD.

There is no other transcript you sad, pathetic, lying partisan hack.