The difference:
-We HAVE the proof that Lisa Page, for example, doctored the findings against Clinton to remove the words "gross negligence" and replaced them with "extremely careless" to avoid using the language straight out of the law that Hillary should have been charged with violating more than a hundred separate times...federal crimes that thoroughly compromised national security...we KNOW that China and Russia gained access to critical national security secrets due to her DELIBERATE crimes.
-Despite a completely rigged impeachment hearing with coached, cherry-picked "witnesses" (who didn't actually witness anything and who only produced third and fourth party conjecture, speculation, and opinion), no actual evidence was produced showing that President Trump committed the non-impeachable non-crime of asking for an investigation into Biden's already proven corruption (as required by law).
Your comparison is what they call "apples and oranges."
Try again.
Which Democrats did to him with Ukraine AND Russia (the dossier)...so why is your tortured misinterpretation of the law only applied in one direction?
Attachment 13181
Thanks for failing to comprehend the difference between an actual crime and an imaginary one.
Bookmarks