Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
Let me start by highlighting the above sentence. That is PRECISELY the argument Dems are using in the trump impeachment...
The difference:

-We HAVE the proof that Lisa Page, for example, doctored the findings against Clinton to remove the words "gross negligence" and replaced them with "extremely careless" to avoid using the language straight out of the law that Hillary should have been charged with violating more than a hundred separate times...federal crimes that thoroughly compromised national security...we KNOW that China and Russia gained access to critical national security secrets due to her DELIBERATE crimes.

-Despite a completely rigged impeachment hearing with coached, cherry-picked "witnesses" (who didn't actually witness anything and who only produced third and fourth party conjecture, speculation, and opinion), no actual evidence was produced showing that President Trump committed the non-impeachable non-crime of asking for an investigation into Biden's already proven corruption (as required by law).

Your comparison is what they call "apples and oranges."

Try again.

Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
he TRIED but FAILED to get a foreign government to dig up dirt on a political rival.
Which Democrats did to him with Ukraine AND Russia (the dossier)...so why is your tortured misinterpretation of the law only applied in one direction?

Attachment 13181

Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
Thanks for admitting that even if an attempt to commit a crime failed, it was still illegal.
Thanks for failing to comprehend the difference between an actual crime and an imaginary one.