Fact: Same sex unions are way inferior to heterosexual unions

[jimmymccready]

David may be a true believer in his own evil, John K Jones.

[CFM]

Can you give us a source other then the original poster,that says people aren't born gay.THX

Since homos claim they were born that way, perhaps you should ask one of them to provide a source other than their "because I said so" argument to prove they were born gay.

[Judy Johnstone]

Since homos claim they were born that way, perhaps you should ask one of them to provide a source other than their "because I said so" argument to prove they were born gay.

So you were assuming.

[CFM]

So you were assuming.

No assumptions at all. Homos claim they were born that way, let them prove it. "Because I said so" isn't proof.

[Judy Johnstone]

No assumptions at all. Homos claim they were born that way, let them prove it. "Because I said so" isn't proof.

You're assuming.You're also painting all gays with the same brush.

[CFM]

You're assuming.You're also painting all gays with the same brush.

Don't have to assume when the facts are there.

No, faggots paint themselves with the same brush.

[Nordberg]

I could give two farts less...


No he doesn't.


My beef is about the attempt to redefine the word 'marriage'. That's where I draw the line.

No change in the definition at all. You are wrong. Marriage was always a legal and binding act. Get a divorce and the courts will make that lesson clear. You do not have to get married in a church and tehre sure as hell isn't any religion in the divorce. Marriage in the old days was about cementing alliances and merging wealthy families.
Exactly how does that exclude gays?

[gfm7175]

No change in the definition at all.

[1] union between one man and one woman... ...
[2] union between one adult and another adult, regardless of sex... ...

Man & woman [1] ≠ man & man or woman & woman [2]... The definition has been changed.

You are wrong.

No, I am quite right, per the proof of identity.

Marriage was always a legal and binding act. Get a divorce and the courts will make that lesson clear.

While it was always meant to be a binding act, it has not always been a legal act.

You do not have to get married in a church and tehre sure as hell isn't any religion in the divorce.

Correct, it is not necessary to get married in a church.

Marriage in the old days was about cementing alliances and merging wealthy families.

??? the fuck??? Marriage is about a male and a female becoming one body, as it has always been about. In fact, a child itself is the physical embodiment of this purpose.

Exactly how does that exclude gays?

Gays are unable to procreate in principle.

[ThatOwlWoman]

Can you give us a source other then the original poster,that says people aren't born gay.THX

Whenever someone claims that humans are not "born gay," it's helpful to ask them to pinpoint the time in their lives when they decided to be straight.

[Judy Johnstone]

Whenever someone claims that humans are not "born gay," it's helpful to ask them to pinpoint the time in their lives when they decided to be straight.

Being Straight isn't all it's cracked up to be!

[Judy Johnstone]

[1] union between one man and one woman... ...
[2] union between one adult and another adult, regardless of sex... ...

Man & woman [1] ≠ man & man or woman & woman [2]... The definition has been changed.


No, I am quite right, per the proof of identity.


While it was always meant to be a binding act, it has not always been a legal act.


Correct, it is not necessary to get married in a church.


??? the fuck??? Marriage is about a male and a female becoming one body, as it has always been about. In fact, a child itself is the physical embodiment of this purpose.


Gays are unable to procreate in principle.

Why do you give a fuck!

[Judy Johnstone]

[1] union between one man and one woman... ...
[2] union between one adult and another adult, regardless of sex... ...

Man & woman [1] ≠ man & man or woman & woman [2]... The definition has been changed.


No, I am quite right, per the proof of identity.


While it was always meant to be a binding act, it has not always been a legal act.


Correct, it is not necessary to get married in a church.


??? the fuck??? Marriage is about a male and a female becoming one body, as it has always been about. In fact, a child itself is the physical embodiment of this purpose.


Gays are unable to procreate in principle.

Why do you give a fuck!

[Nordberg]

[1] union between one man and one woman... ...
[2] union between one adult and another adult, regardless of sex... ...

Man & woman [1] ≠ man & man or woman & woman [2]... The definition has been changed.


No, I am quite right, per the proof of identity.


While it was always meant to be a binding act, it has not always been a legal act.


Correct, it is not necessary to get married in a church.


??? the fuck??? Marriage is about a male and a female becoming one body, as it has always been about. In fact, a child itself is the physical embodiment of this purpose.


Gays are unable to procreate in principle.

Oh, your definition. Not the legal. Not the real one, just yours.
Nope, marriage was always about financial needs. Part of it is to make sure women and children are not left poor when the man moves on. That was, of course, more painful in the old days, but we made laws and regulations to make it fairer.
You may not know it, but married or unmarried you can have sex,. One body? What a silly abstraction that is.
However, gays feel like you do. They want to have a family unit and raise kids. You should welcome them since over half of theses unions you seek end up in divorce, There is nothing particularly holy or special about doing a ceremony.
So you see marriage as an institution for breeding people.

[MAGA MAN]

Whenever someone claims that humans are not "born gay," it's helpful to ask them to pinpoint the time in their lives when they decided to be straight.

When I first saw with my kindergarten teacher...

[Mason Michaels]

When I first saw with my kindergarten teacher...

So you lusted after your kindergarten teacher?