Washington also started the tradition of having chaplains in the Army.
Washington also started the tradition of having chaplains in the Army.
He may have proposed it, but it didn't pass, because the Founders didn't want America to be a Christian country.
In name only. Which states had laws that were actually based on biblical law?to some of the ratifying states HAVING official state religions at the time of the Founding,
Christianity isn't the only philosophy with a god.to the Declaration expressly basing our revolution on Natural Rights that come from God,
So they tried to use Christianity to prove the Revolution was legitimate. Again, what aspects of Christianity were the laws based on?to the overwhelming number of quotes from the Founders directly citing scripture and God as the basis for the legitimacy of the Revolution,
The reason you're getting angry is because you know I'm right.Christianity is at the core of our identity. I know that's not a conclusion liberal bigots can allow themselves to reach (all the evidence be damned), but facts don't care about your snowflake feelings.
Earl (11-29-2019)
But you’re begging the question of whether the Enlightenment could have occurred in anything other than a Christian culture lol.
Did it occur in a Muslim culture? Did it occur in pagan China? No, the Enlightenment began in the Christian West.
From there, the theory could be advanced that as a culture becomes less Christian, it will become less enlightened.
And well, what do ya know. It’s going on before our very eyes.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
Earl (11-29-2019)
I blame the American education system for your post.
So during the Middle Ages, Europe was run by the Catholic Church. This was the only time Europe really had a Christian culture in that all of the laws were based on Christianity. The Enlightenment was a step away from Christianity because it was about Europeans deciding they wanted laws to be based on logic instead of religion. Many of the ideas that got popular during the Enlightenment, such as freedom of speech and democratic elections, were based on the Greek Pagan city-state of Ancient Athens.
The reason the Enlightenment happened isn't because the Europeans were Christian. It's because the Europeans were willing to step away from Christianity and embrace ancient Greek ideas.
Earl (11-29-2019)
In the first sentence you conflated culture with government lol.
They are two distinct things. Europe abandoned theocracy [theocracy contradicts the NT] centuries ago but still retained its Christian culture until very, very recently—in historical terms. Churches dotted the landscape from Ireland to Eastern Europe and beyond.
Meanwhile, freedom, democracy, science and all the products of the Enlightenment flourished.
Presently, it’s not unfair to call Europe, post-Christian in cultural terms. Basically, Europe has lost its cultural identity. And it won’t be long before it starts to lose some of the products of the Enlightenment. The same thing is happening here.
We’re just a little farther behind.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
Europe, with their immigration debacle, has reached the nadir of their existence.
The far left wants the same for America,
Darth Omar (11-29-2019)
Government and laws are part of culture. Western Civilization is partly defined by Democracy.
Theocracy doesn't contradict the NT. What does contradict the NT is the many Greek ideas that defined the Enlightenment.They are two distinct things. Europe abandoned theocracy [theocracy contradicts the NT] centuries ago but still retained its Christian culture until very, very recently—in historical terms. Churches dotted the landscape from Ireland to Eastern Europe and beyond.
I will agree that Christian imagery is part of Western culture. However, Western Civilization is not based on Christianity. And that was my original point. The OP is wrong, America does not have Christian roots. America has Enlightenment roots with some Christian influence, mainly in regards to imagery.
Sure, but that's not because of religion. The European countries are losing their cultural identities because of mass immigration. And while Christianity doesn't have the sway it used to, it's still being used to justify Globalism for Europeans who are still religious. The Pope and various Protestant churches are encouraging immigration from the non-white world.Presently, it’s not unfair to call Europe, post-Christian in cultural terms. Basically, Europe has lost its cultural identity. And it won’t be long before it starts to lose some of the products of the Enlightenment. The same thing is happening here.
Yeah....the "MAYFLOWER COMPACT" and the documented history actual recorded by William Bradford....is just a coverup.
The point? It not a political TRADITION...its a Christian Tradition, just like Xmast, and Easter. There are actually no historical roots found in Christian Doctrine as recorded in scripture...these holidays were created by Christians to demonstrate Christian gratitude toward God.
Its men that wants to inject politics into everything. It is a mission statement of Saul Alinsky to cause division among religious ideologies...divide and conquer. One must know their enemy....and OUR FRIEND "Saul Alinsky" is easy get to know. Just ask MSDNC host Chris Matthews
Last edited by Ralph; 11-29-2019 at 08:35 AM.
Earl (11-29-2019)
The NT absolutely contradicts theocracy and I challenge you to cite chapter and verse if you claim otherwise.
And confining the Christian influences on culture to mere imagery is laughable. One of the reasons communist dictatorships clamp down on Christianity is because *it influences the way people think*. And the same thing goes on here to a lesser degree: the secular left actually knows it’s true that Christians make lousy wards of the state; are apt to reject socialism and etc.
The present Pope is out to lunch but he’s a great example of where ‘Christendom’ stands today in Europe.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
Earl (11-29-2019)
Charoite (11-29-2019)
Two problems with this lie:
1) There is zero indication of that from the evidence. Franklin, Jefferson and Adams all submitted proposals that were overly complicated, as with Adams' depiction of Hercules trying to decide between the path of virtue and pleasure. They were all rejected in favor of something much simpler and easier to recognize.
2) It relies on convincing people, contrary to all known evidence, that the two supposedly MOST secular Founders proposed overtly religious, emphatically Christian imagery and themes for our National Seal.
It's almost as if the only non-Christian element to our entire Founding was the Founders falling over each other to prevent this new Federal Government they were creating from declaring it, Methodist, for example, and forcing all the other states to follow suit. That's what "separation of church and state" (which is not in the Constitution anywhere, by the way) is about...preventing a national religion.
Next lie, please.
You do realize that you simply making things up and saying them doesn't make them true, right? One deeply religious state that had an officially declared religion at the time of the Founding was Massachusetts. Its Puritans were so "religious in name only" that they openly persecuted Quakers and other heretics. Maryland was specifically and expressly founded as a Roman Catholic state to serve as a sanctuary for anyone who wanted to practice the religion. Your profound ignorance of how omnipresent Christianity was among the Founders is a stunning indictment of government (re)education.
It isn't a philosophy at all, uneducated one.
And preventing the Federal Government from establishing a national religion (what the Founders clearly communicated was their intent) in no way implies that they were not Christian.
Sure, but it is obviously more than that. If the stated reason and justification for the creation of an entirely new country (and its new laws) is rights from a Christian god, then Christianity inescapably defines a core part of that country's identity.
-All men being created equal under God ==> Straight out of the Bible
-The sanctity of contract ==> Straight out of the Bible
-Two witnesses required to execute people ==> Straight out of the Bible
-Our rights are inalienable because they come from something higher than man ==> Straight out of the Bible
-Not punishing the son for the sins of the father ==> Straight out of the Bible
-No titles of nobility ==> Straight out of the Bible
-Consent of the governed ==> Straight out of the Bible
-Excepting for the Sabbath ==> Straight out of the Bible
Guessing that the reason you are concluding the exact opposite of what all the evidence shows is bigotry...is not anger. It's the only logical explanation left.
If that's the standard, then Democrats--the most easily and continuously triggered and offended people on the planet--must be wrong 24/7. Thanks for confirming what the thinking adults could already tell.
And no, you getting your ass handed to you with proof on each and every erroneous talking point is not you being "right."
Darth Omar (11-29-2019)
That which is presented without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
Well those Communist dictators are wrong. Religion influences the way people think, but not nearly enough to influence culture on a grand scale. When we think of "Western values" we think of Democracy, freedom of speech, freedom of religion, Abolitionism, equality before the law, and so on. These ideas go against the Bible and early Catholic Church. This means that all of these Christians who talk about how Christianity makes America great are actually ignoring their own religion so that they can have their American values. Which is normal. Humans are logical creatures and on some level we all know religion is bullshit. So virtually all religious people ignore parts of their religion so that they can live more logically.And confining the Christian influences on culture to mere imagery is laughable. One of the reasons communist dictatorships clamp down on Christianity is because *it influences the way people think*. And the same thing goes on here to a lesser degree: the secular left actually knows it’s true that Christians make lousy wards of the state; are apt to reject socialism and etc.
Which just shows that Christianity has failed to protect Europe from Globalism. As soon as the (((Globalists))) got the upper hand, Christianity did what it always does. It changed itself to remain relevant.The present Pope is out to lunch but he’s a great example of where ‘Christendom’ stands today in Europe.
Tranquillus in Exile (11-29-2019)
Bookmarks