Censure as a way out of an impeachment vote?

[Stretch]

Not asking for forgiveness. And you sound like that fanatic Japanese general who lost the island of Iwo Jima in 1945. He committed seppuku. You should look into that

I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve. ~ Yamamoto

[Nordberg]

Mcconnel is in a hole. He knows the Repubs hand waving trump through will get excoriated. Trump is a terrible human being and a worse president. He has done many things which are crooked and dangerous for the country. But if Moscow Mitch can get another 4 years of seating Federalist Society stone age and unqualified judges, the Dems will have to work through rightys in court who are just flat out political. Mitchy is 80 years old and still cannot stand up to big money. The 5th element has a guy Zorg who sold the eath to the dark forces. Mitch is like him.

[Truth Detector]

Not asking for forgiveness. And you sound like that fanatic Japanese general who lost the island of Iwo Jima in 1945. He committed seppuku. You should look into that

[Truth Detector]

Mcconnel is in a hole. He knows the Repubs hand waving trump through will get excoriated. Trump is a terrible human being and a worse president. He has done many things which are crooked and dangerous for the country. But if Moscow Mitch can get another 4 years of seating Federalist Society stone age and unqualified judges, the Dems will have to work through rightys in court who are just flat out political. Mitchy is 80 years old and still cannot stand up to big money. The 5th element has a guy Zorg who sold the eath to the dark forces. Mitch is like him.

[archives]

Priceless! Yes, let's re-litigate the Mueller HOAX.

A lawsuit? LINK!

It is not "relitigating" anything, they have had an active investigation into the matter since January, remember Mueller never said obstruction was off the table, and with the testimony from the latest Roger Stone case they have new evidence that the Trump campaign lied when it said they had no contacts with Wikileaks over the Emails

As I said, waiting for a ruling on McGahn's subpoena
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...d00_story.html

[Truth Detector]

It is not "relitigating" anything, they have had an active investigation into the matter since January, remember Mueller never said obstruction was off the table, and with the testimony from the latest Roger Stone case they have new evidence that the Trump campaign lied when it said they had no contacts with Wikileaks over the Emails

Representative Doug Collins to Mueller: "at anytime during the investigation was your investigation curtailed, or stopped, or hindered?"

Muller: "no".

CASE CLOSED!!!

As I said, waiting for a ruling on McGahn's subpoena

[archives]

Mcconnel is in a hole. He knows the Repubs hand waving trump through will get excoriated. Trump is a terrible human being and a worse president. He has done many things which are crooked and dangerous for the country. But if Moscow Mitch can get another 4 years of seating Federalist Society stone age and unqualified judges, the Dems will have to work through rightys in court who are just flat out political. Mitchy is 80 years old and still cannot stand up to big money. The 5th element has a guy Zorg who sold the eath to the dark forces. Mitch is like him.

He is in a bit of a spot, everyone knows any impeachment trial will be quickly whitewashed thru the Senate, making the Senate appear even more partisan than the GOP tried to paint the House, hell, a good number of GOP Seantors have already mouth off about it in the media and they are suppose to be the impartial jury

Trump is going to demand a straight party line, making it appear worse, and at the same time Mitch has a number of GOP Senators running in purple States, so he has a fine line to walk, couldn't have happen to a more deserving fellow

[archives]

[i][size=4]Representative Doug Collins to Mueller: "at anytime during the investigation was your investigation curtailed, or stopped, or hindered?"


CASE CLOSED!!!]

I see "truthie" is at it again, his cherrypicked quotes to end the matter, fortunately that ain't the way it works, now to once again employ a little Jimmy Jordan tactic, "now, I wondering, did he say obstruct in there? Did Collins ask Mueller if his investigation was obstructed? You are telling us Mueller said his investigation was obstructed when Mueller was never even asked if obstruction occurred?" etc., etc., etc

And the investigation into obstruction continues

[Truth Detector]

I see "truthie" is at it again, his cherrypicked quotes to end the matter,

Cherry picked? Do you need more. Hell, there is a whole massive pile of EVIDENCE that doesn't support your lame stupid claims.

So here we have Mueller testifying that no one curtailed, stopped, or hindered his investigation and your response is; YOUR CHERRY PICKING?? How fucking dumb are you?

fortunately that ain't the way it works, now to once again employ a little Jimmy Jordan tactic,

There you go with the lame whiny stupid memes. You can't post without lying or crying can you sad sack?

"now, I wondering, did he say obstruct in there? Did Collins ask Mueller if his investigation was obstructed?

WTFU do you think curtailed, stopped, or hindered means you willful idiot?

You are telling us Mueller said his investigation was obstructed when Mueller was never even asked if obstruction occurred?" etc., etc., etc

Read what you posted you moron. Look up the definition of obstruction you willful idiot.

obstruction [ uhb-struhk-shuhn ]
noun
something that obstructs, blocks, or closes up with an obstacle or obstacles; obstacle or hindrance:

And the investigation into obstruction continues

Barr: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

[Adolf_Twitler]

WRONG; he's been innocent all along which is why the CLOWN SHOW we have been watching from the Democrats comes up empty handed.

Here's what you will be doing in 2020:

No one knows what exactly will happen in 2020 yet!

But, you are free to run your mouth! And you are free to talk out your ass!

Your prediction is about as good or as bad as anyone else.

[CFM]

I love to go watch compilations of election night triggerings, just for fun. I admit it's me at not my best.

The funniest one I remember was Chuck Todd. He looked like a kid that had just dropped his ice cream cone when Trump was declared the winner.

[archives]

Cherry picked? Do you need more. Hell, there is a whole massive pile of EVIDENCE that doesn't support your lame stupid claims.

So here we have Mueller testifying that no one curtailed, stopped, or hindered his investigation and your response is; YOUR CHERRY PICKING?? How fucking dumb are you?



There you go with the lame whiny stupid memes. You can't post without lying or crying can you sad sack?



WTFU do you think curtailed, stopped, or hindered means you willful idiot?



Read what you posted you moron. Look up the definition of obstruction you willful idiot.

obstruction [ uhb-struhk-shuhn ]
noun
something that obstructs, blocks, or closes up with an obstacle or obstacles; obstacle or hindrance:



Barr: Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and I have concluded that the evidence developed during the Special Counsel's investigation is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

Why do I always have to correct "truthie?"

“Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General’s recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony.”

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment.”

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/04/wh...t-obstruction/

Now tell us again how Mueller said no obstruction occurred

[Darth Omar]

Why do I always have to correct "truthie?"

“Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General’s recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony.”

"If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the President clearly did not commit obstruction of justice, we would so state. Based on the facts and the applicable legal standards, we are unable to reach that judgment.”

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/04/wh...t-obstruction/

Now tell us again how Mueller said no obstruction occurred

Congratulations for getting weasel-worded by Mullet lol!

He couldn’t very well say none of the potential acts of obstruction by Trump would stand a chance in front of a jury, could he. That’s not the stuff of an impeachment roadmap.

[archives]

Congratulations for getting weasel-worded by Mullet lol!

He couldn’t very well say none of the potential acts of obstruction by Trump would stand a chance in front of a jury, could he. That’s not the stuff of an impeachment roadmap.

Impeachment isn't a criminal charge, and what Mueller was saying that there existed enough solid proof to establish a criminal case, but that didn't mean the case was closed, in other words, he was passing it on to Congress, which is what the Judiciary Committee is doing now

Mueller was a Republican, selected by a Trump appointee and overseen and answering to a Trump Justice Department, he was never going to end up with anything earth shattering, he even dropped hints of such during the investigation

Irony is that even if Trump was to win in 2020, the probability right now exists that the Democrats are going to keep the House, so none of this will stop, the GOP kept investigations into everything and anything Obama/Hillary alive for ten years, the Democrats have only been at less than a year so far, and Trump just gives them so much to examine

[Sailor]

Impeachment isn't a criminal charge, and what Mueller was saying that there existed enough solid proof to establish a criminal case, but that didn't mean the case was closed, in other words, he was passing it on to Congress, which is what the Judiciary Committee is doing now

Mueller was a Republican, selected by a Trump appointee and overseen and answering to a Trump Justice Department, he was never going to end up with anything earth shattering, he even dropped hints of such during the investigation

Irony is that even if Trump was to win in 2020, the probability right now exists that the Democrats are going to keep the House, so none of this will stop, the GOP kept investigations into everything and anything Obama/Hillary alive for ten years, the Democrats have only been at less than a year so far, and Trump just gives them so much to examine

It will. And hard. Rational Americans are not putting up with this horseshit anymore.