Another impeachment show trial "witness" caught lying

[Darth Omar]

I can't see the OP. Please tell me he didn't cite Solomon?

Why are lefties so defensive when it comes to Solomon’s *sourced* reporting on Ukraine?

[christiefan915]

Fiona Hill falsely insisted that Republicans denied Russia's election meddling (what they denied is the left's ludicrous conspiracy theories about COLLUSION), and also falsely insisted that well-documented, proven Ukraine meddling was some kind of debunked conspiracy theory, despite all these court records and DEMOCRAT sources documenting how it all happened. The two things all these cherry-picked, coached, hilariously self-described "non-partisan" witnesses seem to have in common is that they didn't actually witness anything and that they straight up lied under oath.

Desperation, much?

Attachment 12770

How do you know that every repub believed the Russians meddled, just because that was the official position of the govt.? It's not cut and dried.

An example of false belief: the official position of the govt. is that 9/11 was an al-Qaeda operation yet some U.S. pols still thought it was an inside job.

[christiefan915]

I can't see the OP. Please tell me he didn't cite Solomon?

The article was from RedState so that says it all.

[Darth Omar]

How do you know that every repub believed the Russians meddled, just because that was the official position of the govt.? It's not cut and dried.

An example of false belief: the official position of the govt. is that 9/11 was an al-Qaeda operation yet some U.S. pols still thought it was an inside job.

The *mainstream* republican position is that Russia meddled but the ‘Russian effect’ was either insignificant or unquantifiable.

You may note that’s consistent with Mullet’s conclusion.

And there’s more than ample evidence that the Ukrainians meddled FOR Hillary and AGAINST Trump that’s hardly a ‘conspiracy theory’. Maybe not to the same extent as the Russians [whatever the hell that ‘extent’ was] but foreign meddling is foreign meddling.

[PostmodernProphet]

FAIL!

why do you have a penis in your ear?......

[christiefan915]

The *mainstream* republican position is that Russia meddled but the ‘Russian effect’ was either insignificant or unquantifiable.

You may note that’s consistent with Mullet’s conclusion.

And there’s more than ample evidence that the Ukrainians meddled FOR Hillary and AGAINST Trump that’s hardly a ‘conspiracy theory’. Maybe not to the same extent as the Russians [whatever the hell that ‘extent’ was] but foreign meddling is foreign meddling.

I'll take the word of Fiona Hill and others who've actually been to Ukraine, and who stated unequivocally that trump's Ukraine narrative is fictional.

[Cancel 2020.2]

My question is HOW long are they going to let this sh*t show go on? The Dim Dems obviously have NOTHING impeachable to charge our president with. It's a total waste of everyone and everything involved in this charade. The Dems should be concentrating on coming up with solid issues and policies that would actually challenge conservative ideas and President Trump. But NO, the ONLY platform the Dim Dems seem to be riding on is, "We HATE Trump, orange man BAD."

[Darth Omar]

Now it is getting really confusing, Trump tells us Russia meddling in the last election was a hoax, and Trumpkins have been telling us if Russia did get involved it didn't mean anything, "show us how many votes were changed," and now all that is changed to a new argument?

And as you were shown last time, and Dr Hill even explained today, the Ukraine, Crowd Strike, what ever it is conspiracy was and is bogus, even the articles you keep posting show it, give it up

I’ll tell what’s confusing—the Schiff hearings lol.

Pretend you know nothing about the issue and watch it. You’ll find yourself wondering what the frick it’s all about. All of these ‘star’ witnesses with their opinions, impressions, overheard conversations and etc. The average person has the attention span of a chipmunk. The average voter maybe a tad more, and democrats are expecting them to follow along with the plot?

Both the Nixon and Clinton impeachments could be synopsized in half a paragraph and this thing has people reaching for the Cliff Notes.

[Darth Omar]

My question is HOW long are they going to let this sh*t show go on? The Dim Dems obviously have NOTHING impeachable to charge our president with. It's a total waste of everyone and everything involved in this charade. The Dems should be concentrating on coming up with solid issues and policies that would actually challenge conservative ideas and President Trump. But NO, the ONLY platform the Dim Dems seem to be riding on is, "We HATE Trump, orange man BAD."

I read where some republican senators WANT this to go to trial because so far the poll numbers are helping Trump and republicans.

Plus, they’ll have access to the WB and Hunter Biden.

[christiefan915]

I read where some republican senators WANT this to go to trial because so far the poll numbers are helping Trump and republicans.

Plus, they’ll have access to the WB and Hunter Biden.

I don't mind if the WB and Hunter testify. The Hunter Biden thing is just a smoke screen anyway. Are RWs going to be happy if Mulvaney, Bolton and Pompeo testify?

[Darth Omar]

I don't mind if the WB and Hunter testify. The Hunter Biden thing is just a smoke screen anyway. Are RWs going to be happy if Mulvaney, Bolton and Pompeo testify?

Democrats have backed off on Bolton.

Maybe they’re afraid he’ll ‘spill the wrong beans’ lol.

But here’s Fiona Hill ‘spilling some beans’:

Did Ms. Hill just imply that Hillary/DNC/Democrat Media were unwitting Russian stooges?

[Flash]

I read where some republican senators WANT this to go to trial because so far the poll numbers are helping Trump and republicans.

There is one story that Republicans are considering stretching the trial as long as possible to keep the Democratic presidential candidates busy during primary/caucus season.

Why would they have access to Hunter Biden? And what does that have to do with Trump?

[Darth Omar]

There is one story that Republicans are considering stretching the trial as long as possible to keep the Democratic presidential candidates busy during primary/caucus season.

Why would they have access to Hunter Biden? And what does that have to do with Trump?

Hunter Biden has everything to do with what they’re trying to impeach Trump for.

If Hunter is Ukraine-dirty then Trump was justified in asking the Ukrainians to investigate Hunter and Burisma. And it wouldn’t matter if that benefited Trump—what’s he supposed to do, ignore it because it might knock Joe Biden out of the race?

[christiefan915]

Hunter Biden has everything to do with what they’re trying to impeach Trump for.

If Hunter is Ukraine-dirty then Trump was justified in asking the Ukrainians to investigate Hunter and Burisma. And it wouldn’t matter if that benefited Trump—what’s he supposed to do, ignore it because it might knock Joe Biden out of the race?

The problem is that trump singled out the son of a campaign rival and not just any random American working there. trump himself had a corrupt American with Ukraine ties head his campaign team in 2016. Now the GOP is raising the question that despite all the evidence against Manafort, the ledgers may have been doctored.

[Darth Omar]

The problem is that trump singled out the son of a campaign rival and not just any random American working there. trump himself had a corrupt American with Ukraine ties head his campaign team in 2016. Now the GOP is raising the question that despite all the evidence against Manafort, the ledgers may have been doctored.

Democrats would have a much better case if Trump picked out a random democrat and not the Biden’s lol.

The Biden’s have dragged this thing down from the start: they’re the haunting specter that won’t go away. And yes, republicans control the senate, so yes, Hunter will take the stand.

And he will need more than the media’s insistence that there’s nothing to be discovered.

And the televised audience will finally get a look at Eric Ciamarella. I would suggest putting his lawyer on the stand for an explanation about his call for a coup.

I still can’t believe Pelosi is serious about doing this.