George W Bush exonerated!

[evince]

all cold hard court documented Republican party cheating pretty much EVERY election since I could vote


My first vote was for Anderson

a conservative dem third party dude

I have voted Democratic party since that election


why?

because the republican party is evil


and I learned more about conservative ideas


which suck ass

[evince]

Oh and BTW

there is NO LIKE RECORD IN THE COURTS FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY

even though every time the republicans get caught cheating they scream the Democratic party cheats too


they don't

its merely a republican lie so many other republican lies


Like non citizens voting


EVERY STUDY DONE

proves they dont

[evince]

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-...435-story.html

[evince]

GOP Memo Admits Plan Could ‘Keep Black Vote Down’
Oct. 25, 1986 12 AM

Facebook

Twitter

Show more sharing options
From the Washington Post
NEWARK, N.J. — A Republican National Committee official calculated that a so-called ballot security program in Louisiana “could keep the black vote down considerably,” according to documents released in federal court Friday.
The documents and court hearing were the latest developments in a controversy over the GOP’s ballot program that Democrats maintain is aimed at reducing minority turnout. The Republicans say the program’s sole purpose is to purge ineligible voters from voting roles.
In an Aug. 13 memo the court made public Friday, Kris Wolfe, the Republican National Committee Midwest political director, wrote Lanny Griffith, the committee’s Southern political director, and said of the Louisiana campaigning:
“I know this race is really important to you. I would guess that this program will eliminate at least 60-80,000 folks from the rolls. . . . If it’s a close race . . . which I’m assuming it is, this could keep the black vote down considerably.”


Unseals Document


She said in the memorandum that the program had been approved by Gregory Graves, deputy political director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
The document, called Exhibit 13, was unsealed by U.S. District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise when lawyers for the Democratic National Committee said it was needed to question Wolfe.
Wolfe testified that she wrote about the possibility of keeping the black vote down to remind Griffith that there “might be a political situation he might want to consider. . . . I wanted him to be aware of the political considerations.”

[evince]

note the date


that is under ronny rayguns

[Minister of Truth]

are you unaware of DNC V RNC that resulted in a 30+ year long court ordered consent decree against the republican party?

Are you aware of landslide victories in 1980, 1984, and 1988?

[evince]

Are you aware of landslide victories in 1980, 1984, and 1988?

the ones the republican party cheated in?

[Minister of Truth]

the ones the republican party cheated in?

I think the Republicans might have cheated in, like, 1876?

[RB 60]

note the date


that is under ronny rayguns

Are you snorting bath salts again?

[evince]

I think the Republicans might have cheated in, like, 1876?

COLD HARD USA COURT SYSTEM DOCUMENTED RECORDS THAT GO ALL THE WAY TO THE US SCOTUS IS WHAT YOU ARE PRETENDING DOESNT EXIST

[evince]

GOP Memo Admits Plan Could ‘Keep Black Vote Down’
Oct. 25, 1986 12 AM

Facebook

Twitter

Show more sharing options
From the Washington Post
NEWARK, N.J. — A Republican National Committee official calculated that a so-called ballot security program in Louisiana “could keep the black vote down considerably,” according to documents released in federal court Friday.
The documents and court hearing were the latest developments in a controversy over the GOP’s ballot program that Democrats maintain is aimed at reducing minority turnout. The Republicans say the program’s sole purpose is to purge ineligible voters from voting roles.
In an Aug. 13 memo the court made public Friday, Kris Wolfe, the Republican National Committee Midwest political director, wrote Lanny Griffith, the committee’s Southern political director, and said of the Louisiana campaigning:
“I know this race is really important to you. I would guess that this program will eliminate at least 60-80,000 folks from the rolls. . . . If it’s a close race . . . which I’m assuming it is, this could keep the black vote down considerably.”


Unseals Document


She said in the memorandum that the program had been approved by Gregory Graves, deputy political director of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
The document, called Exhibit 13, was unsealed by U.S. District Judge Dickinson R. Debevoise when lawyers for the Democratic National Committee said it was needed to question Wolfe.
Wolfe testified that she wrote about the possibility of keeping the black vote down to remind Griffith that there “might be a political situation he might want to consider. . . . I wanted him to be aware of the political considerations.”

this was under ronny rayguns


THE RNC HAD ALREADY BEEN PLACED UNDER A COURT ORDERD CONSENT DECREE WHEN THEY DID THIS CHEATING

[evince]

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-wo...consent-decree

DNC v. RNC Consent Decree


In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts.

Published: November 5, 2016

Gerrymandering & Fair Representation
Redistricting
In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot security” programs, including any proposed voter caging.
The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. In late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the RNC had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the RNC asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision. A subsequent petition for rehearing en banc by the full Third Circuit, and a certiorari petition to U.S. Supreme Court, were denied.
On October 26, 2016, the DNC filed a motion asking that the court find the RNC had violated the decree. On November 5, after abbreviated discovery, the district court denied the DNC’s request, ruling that the DNC had not provided sufficient evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and the RNC on ballot-security operations, but will allow the DNC to offer further evidence after the election.
Click here to learn more about voter caging.
Click here to learn more about ballot security programs.
Related Court Documents
2016
Order Denying Request to Extend Decree (November 5, 2016)
RNC's Memorandum in Opposition to Order to Show Cause (October 31, 2016)
DNC's Memorandum in Support of Order to Show Cause (October 26, 2016)
2012
Petition for Rehearing (March 22, 2012)
Third Circuit Opinion (March 8, 2012)
2009
Debevoise Order (December 1, 2009)
Debevoise Opinion (December 1, 2009)
RNC Post-Hearing Brief (June 26, 2009)
DNC Post-Hearing Brief (June 26, 2009)
RNC Reply Brief (February 19, 2009)
DNC Brief Opposing Motion to Vacate (January 19, 2009)
RNC Brief in Support of Motion (November 3, 2008)
2008 (several states)
DNC Brief (November 3, 2008)
DNC Brief Atty. Certification of Exhibits (November 3, 2008)
OFA Intervention Memo (November 3, 2008)
Minute Entry (November 3, 2008)
2004 (Ohio)
Malone Dismissal (February 3, 2005)
Malone en banc Decision (November 9, 2004)
Malone Appellate Decision (November 1, 2004)
Malone Order (November 1, 2004)
Malone Intervenor PI brief (November 1, 2004)
Malone Intervenor Complaint (October 31, 2004)
Malone Memo in Support of Intervention (October 28, 2004)
Malone Motion to Intervene (October 28, 2004)
2004 (South Dakota)
Daschle Temporary Restraining Order (November 2, 2004)
Daschle SD Complaint (November 1, 2004)
2002 (New Jersey)
Order (October 31, 2002)
1990 (North Carolina)
Order (November 5, 1990)
1987 (several states)
Consent Decree (July 27, 1987)
Original 1981 case (New Jersey)
Consent Decree (November 1, 1982)
Complaint (February 11, 1982)



each complaint is clickable if you go to the link



Brennan was a SCOTUS member


this center was named after him

[evince]

the republican party has been EVIL my entire life