Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 98

Thread: Are you watching FOX?

  1. #61 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,815
    Thanks
    301
    Thanked 943 Times in 675 Posts
    Groans
    20
    Groaned 10 Times in 10 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    Starr just walked it all back..
    Sonderland's opening statement completely missed the exoneration of Trumps "no quid pro quo"-
    so his Statement of "yes" was bogus
    I wonder if Jarod was still watching Fox when Starr walked it back. Why no updates, Jarod?

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Southern Chicken For This Post:

    Stretch (11-20-2019), Truth Detector (11-20-2019)

  3. #62 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,517
    Thanks
    72,463
    Thanked 35,764 Times in 27,239 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,589 Times in 18,178 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Not quite what Star said, he did imply that Sondland's testimony of not being able to see the records of his own phone calls and documents made a strong case of obstruction, but he added that he'd be anxious to see if the Republicans can offer something to challenge this position, kinda of middle ground

    The other FOX "contributors" and regulars were pretty much scrambling, the only thing they concurred on was that Sondland was covering Sondland's ass. Surely one of the Trump lackeys will give them a talking point they can mobilize this afternoon
    Nunes tried


    but his efforts were sooo pathetic no one is repeating them

    there is nothing they can say but out right lies

  4. #63 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,517
    Thanks
    72,463
    Thanked 35,764 Times in 27,239 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,589 Times in 18,178 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    "truthie" just can't accept the fact that the Democrats have only been at it for ten months now, what occurred previously was headed by a Republican authorized by a Trump Republican appointee and overseen by a Trump Justice Dept.. If the democrats were during it it probably would have turned out a bit different
    they would not have mischaracterized the results and hidden it for a month

  5. #64 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Sondland is falling apart

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    Truth Detector (11-20-2019)

  7. #65 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    184,517
    Thanks
    72,463
    Thanked 35,764 Times in 27,239 Posts
    Groans
    54
    Groaned 19,589 Times in 18,178 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  8. #66 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    12,526
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 8,341 Times in 5,714 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 374 Times in 355 Posts

    Default

    Jim Jordan always summarizes so well,

    so now Schifty Schiff throws the mic to a minority / woman token question

    Does this "woman" Sewell look like someone who you want on your team? notsomuch
    This just In::: Trump indicted for living in liberals heads and not paying RENT

    C̶N̶N̶ SNN.... Shithole News Network

    Trump Is Coming back to a White House Near you

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Getin the ring For This Post:

    Truth Detector (11-20-2019)

  10. #67 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    "I dont recall" over and over. this witness is worthless

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    Truth Detector (11-20-2019)

  12. #68 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,644
    Thanks
    18,222
    Thanked 15,646 Times in 10,702 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 618 Times in 607 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    WOW, Ken Star, a forever Trumpper just said this is over!

    This guy has been speaking the party line for months.....


    He says the Democrats have three articles of impeachment clearly viable.

    No one ever doubted that the Stalin-o-crats would file for impeachment.


    I'll be sure to thank them for handing us 2020....
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    Truth Detector (11-20-2019)

  14. #69 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    7,318
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,883 Times in 2,239 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 124 Times in 120 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    WOW, Ken Star, a forever Trumpper just said this is over!

    This guy has been speaking the party line for months.....


    He says the Democrats have three articles of impeachment clearly viable.
    Another FACE plant. Funny as hell. Like a monkey attempting to screw a football....nothing illegal about a POTUS establishing foreign policy and implementing it. Game over.

    A few facts in evidence. The aid was delivered......Ukraine never started an investigation, and the presidents of both nations are on record declaring there was nothing wrong with the conditions of the aid. In fact Trump delivered the aid to Ukraine that Obama never did.....actual weapons for self defense instead of solar blankets. The corruption that Trump is demanding to be investigated is the USE of the 1.5 billion aid package delivered under the Obama Regime, its disappeared...that is what RUDY was investigating...corruption from 2016.

    For bribery, extortion, or a Quid Pro Quo....there must be something of value exchanged between the parties. The aid was delivered.....there was never an investigation started . Where is the BEEF..the Quid for the Quo? The Bribery? .....as the witness stated very clearly, "I "PRESUMED" there was a Quid Pro Quo, but I have no direct evidence of such....President Trump stated that He did not want anything from Ukraine except a promise to attempt to control the corruption in that nation. 1.5 Billion dollars had already disappeared with nothing but Blankets to show for it.

    FACE PLANT. More hearsay.
    Last edited by Ralph; 11-20-2019 at 01:11 PM.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Ralph For This Post:

    Truth Detector (11-20-2019)

  16. #70 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Jordan pressing Sondland now, about why he did not include Trump's statement saying "I want nothing" from Ukraine in his opening statement.
    Sondland says he did not mean to omit that from his opener.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to dukkha For This Post:

    Truth Detector (11-20-2019)

  18. #71 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    28,403
    Thanks
    26,104
    Thanked 11,856 Times in 8,415 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,290 Times in 2,172 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Fox News = Fake News.

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to Trumpet For This Post:

    evince (11-20-2019)

  20. #72 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Sondland:
    Asked Trump. "What do your want from Ukraine?"
    Trump said, "I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo.
    Tell Zelensky to do the right thing."

    Sondland told Pencelneck that was all I got from Pres. Trump.

    **********

    CNN now has another fake news headline out there............losers.
    Per CNN: WITNESS IMPLICATES TRUMP
    Just now Sondland testified in agreement with Turner...

    No one on this planet told him that President Trump was tying aid
    to 2016, Burisma or Biden investigations. He was only presuming.

    "2 presumptions + 2 presumptions does not equal 1 fact."
    Rep. Dr. Wenstrup 11/19/19
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  21. The Following User Says Thank You to Stretch For This Post:

    Truth Detector (11-20-2019)

  22. #73 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    72,416
    Thanks
    6,690
    Thanked 12,320 Times in 9,828 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 510 Times in 483 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Centerleftfl View Post
    Blowjobs or extorting a foreign country using a half bill $ in taxpayer allotted funds while that country's soldiers died. All to get dirt on a US political opponent who is also an ex VP of the United States.

    Yep, lying about BLOWJOBS is soooo much more sinister and dire than EXTORTION.
    who's son is on the take from an actually corrupt Ukrainian company...

  23. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Blackwater Lunchbreak For This Post:

    Stretch (11-20-2019), Truth Detector (11-20-2019)

  24. #74 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,240 Times in 13,965 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,054 Times in 2,849 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ralph View Post
    Another FACE plant. Funny as hell. Like a monkey attempting to screw a football....nothing illegal about a POTUS establishing foreign policy and implementing it. Game over.

    A few facts in evidence. The aid was delivered......Ukraine never started an investigation, and the presidents of both nations are on record declaring there was nothing wrong with the conditions of the aid. In fact Trump delivered the aid to Ukraine that Obama never did.....actual weapons for self defense instead of solar blankets. The corruption that Trump is demanding to be investigated is the USE of the 1.5 billion aid package delivered under the Obama Regime, its disappeared...that is what RUDY was investigating...corruption from 2016.

    For bribery, extortion, or a Quid Pro Quo....there must be something of value exchanged between the parties. The aid was delivered.....there was never an investigation started . Where is the BEEF..the Quid for the Quo? The Bribery? .....as the witness stated very clearly, "I "PRESUMED" there was a Quid Pro Quo, but I have no direct evidence of such....President Trump stated that He did not want anything from Ukraine except a promise to attempt to control the corruption in that nation. 1.5 Billion dollars had already disappeared with nothing but Blankets to show for it.

    FACE PLANT. More hearsay.
    Another one, all of that was done after Trump realized the whistleblower complaint was serious and on its way to Congress, Trump had been caught, the scheme to get the Ukraine to investigate his political rival was out of the bag, he has to quit on his scheme

    And before you go there, so was the tape the Trumpkins keep recycling of the Ukrainian President saying "no pressure"

  25. #75 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    42,245
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,240 Times in 13,965 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,054 Times in 2,849 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    Jordan pressing Sondland now, about why he did not include Trump's statement saying "I want nothing" from Ukraine in his opening statement.
    Sondland says he did not mean to omit that from his opener.
    Probably cause the statement means nothing, it came long after Trump had been caught, by that time his scheme to get the Ukrainians to investigate Biden was blown

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 48
    Last Post: 10-28-2019, 11:38 AM
  2. Anyone watching CNN?
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-02-2013, 03:53 PM
  3. Watching Bloomberg
    By canceled.2021.1 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-29-2012, 06:09 PM
  4. What are you watching right now?
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-20-2010, 05:43 PM
  5. I can't believe I'm actually watching this
    By Cypress in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-20-2007, 04:03 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •