Vindman is the Leaker to WB

[dukkha]

1. The Whistleblower complaint to the IC IG used the term "Trump demanded" ( as in quid pro quo)
2. All witnesses today did not agree Trump "demanded" anything, and nothing was given.
3. Vindman made the claim that Trump "demanded" in his dungeon disposition

AlsoVindman has been called out for going outside the chain of command (like leaking ?? )
and not playing well with others. he's a self-important cog in the machine
~~

Laura Ingram show also tonight showed Schiff refuses to put into the Congressional Record
the statute he claims give the WB anonymity .
The statute makes an exception in cases of prosecution ( which this is)

Schiff is s crafty lawyer. He knows the statute doesn't support his claim

[katzgar]

1. The Whistleblower complaint to the IC IG used the term "Trump demanded" ( as in quid pro quo)
2. All witnesses today did not agree Trump "demanded" anything, and nothing was given.
3. Vindman made the claim that Trump "demanded" in his dungeon disposition

AlsoVindman has been called out for going outside the chain of command (like leaking ?? )
and not playing well with others. he's a self-important cog in the machine
~~

Laura Ingram show also tonight showed Schiff refuses to put into the Congressional Record
the statute he claims give the WB anonymity .
The statute makes an exception in cases of prosecution ( which this is)

Schiff is s crafty lawyer. He knows the statute doesn't support his claim

You are such a sleazy piece of scum. You attack a member of the military that's honorable and you just don't give a s*** as long as you can protect your racist homophobic president. people like you are the most vile and disgusting pieces of s*** on the planet

[dukkha]

You are such a sleazy piece of scum. You attack a member of the military that's honorable and you just don't give a s*** as long as you can protect your racist homophobic president. people like you are the most vile and disgusting pieces of s*** on the planet

ROFL don't hold back on your rant .
can you get anything else in there?

Look Vindman is a player - he's loving the lime light being the self important dweeb he is, but that's not the point here.

The point is there is the WB *the name we dare not say but all know*
& Leaker to the WB .
read what I wrote 1. 2. 3. Connect the dots and tell me i'm wrong that he's the leaker.

[cancel2 2022]

ROFL don't hold back on your rant .
can you get anything else in there?

Look Vindman is a player - he's loving the lime light being the self important dweeb he is, but that's not the point here.

The point is there is the WB *the name we dare not say but all know*
& Leaker to the WB .
read what I wrote 1. 2. 3. Connect the dots and tell me i'm wrong that he's the leaker.

Wasting your time with that pompous cunt, don't bother with him.

[canceled.2021.2]

Vindman is exactly what is wrong with our gobblement and what Trump is exposing

[Charoite]

I believe this belongs in the conspiracy forum.

[Darth Omar]

1. The Whistleblower complaint to the IC IG used the term "Trump demanded" ( as in quid pro quo)
2. All witnesses today did not agree Trump "demanded" anything, and nothing was given.
3. Vindman made the claim that Trump "demanded" in his dungeon disposition

AlsoVindman has been called out for going outside the chain of command (like leaking ?? )
and not playing well with others. he's a self-important cog in the machine
~~

Laura Ingram show also tonight showed Schiff refuses to put into the Congressional Record
the statute he claims give the WB anonymity .
The statute makes an exception in cases of prosecution ( which this is)

Schiff is s crafty lawyer. He knows the statute doesn't support his claim

You don’t even need to be a lawyer to know it. The WB law is plainly written and it plainly does NOT guarantee anonymity. Again, Schiff is straight up lying in front of congress. And there’s no hedging on it or saying ‘well, depends on how you interpret it’—no, Schiff is lying to protect the WB.

Apparently, the only immediate remedy for it is for republicans to sit there and call Schiff a liar to his face in front of large room filled with people and a national audience. Think about that for a minute: what kind of person would tolerate that?

Even if Pelosi convinced me to lie in order to protect the WB, once it became obvious that I was lying to the extent everyone in the room knew I was lying and were calling me out on it I’d say ‘F* this bullshit. You’re right, the WB law doesn’t protect guarantee anonymity’. That’s what any normal person would do.

But that’s the kind of people we/Trump are dealing with. Schiff had little to no credibility before yesterday and after yesterday there’s good reason to not believe a word he says.

Schiff claims he doesn’t know the WB. Right. Whatever.

[dukkha]

Wasting your time with that pompous cunt, don't bother with him.

of course.but i defended the OP as well

[Getin the ring]

Vindman came across as a little weasel didn't he,

amazing he is an officer

[dukkha]

Vindman was unreliable and had questionable judgment, according to his own outgoing superior, Tim Morrison, the National Security Council’s senior director for European affairs.

In fact, Morrison viewed Vindman as so untrustworthy that he opted to exclude him from his conversations with William Taylor, the senior US diplomat in Ukraine.

Vindman had an “unfortunate habit,” Morrison thought, of defying the sprawling executive branch’s carefully delineated chain of command. Vindman’s testimony vindicates Morrison’s dripping disdain for his former subordinate.

The officer, who testified that he has never spoken directly with the president, nonetheless admitted to advising Zelensky as to how to comport himself in his communication with Trump. Vindman testified that he did not have time to express his concerns directly to Morrison, but he apparently found the time to express his concerns to both Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent and an unnamed individual in the intelligence community.

As The Federalist’s Sean Davis noted, it is about as plausible an interpretation as any that the nation is now slogging through this imbroglio because Vindman opted to work in tandem with a Deep State whistleblower to jump-start impeachment proceedings over a disagreement with a phone call’s ethics
https://nypost.com/2019/11/19/alexan...icJuUdCukAnt2U

[Jarod]

1. The Whistleblower complaint to the IC IG used the term "Trump demanded" ( as in quid pro quo)
2. All witnesses today did not agree Trump "demanded" anything, and nothing was given.
3. Vindman made the claim that Trump "demanded" in his dungeon disposition

AlsoVindman has been called out for going outside the chain of command (like leaking ?? )
and not playing well with others. he's a self-important cog in the machine
~~

Laura Ingram show also tonight showed Schiff refuses to put into the Congressional Record
the statute he claims give the WB anonymity .
The statute makes an exception in cases of prosecution ( which this is)

Schiff is s crafty lawyer. He knows the statute doesn't support his claim

That makes Vindman a hero.