TRUMP throwing impeachment witnesses out of HIS WH`

**Ralph** · 11-19-2019, 07:26 PM

Originally Posted by ZILCHMONGER

Trump may very well be re-elected but there will be no indictments.

Yeah.....the criminal investigation of BARR/DURHAM is just a conspiracy. And 1000 page reports from the Inspector Generals office is common practice to slap people on the wrest. And the IG is summoned to testify in front of the Senate Judicial committee (Dec. 11th) for grins and giggles.

FYI: There were {2} criminal indictments today with the on-going Epstein investigation.

As far as this latest FACE PLANT by the SHITSHOW....what did we really learn about Shitforbrains' star witness....the ONE that was actually privy to the Ukrainian phone call (Vindman).

He admitted under oath that he was privy to the call.....and later attempted to access the transcript of the phone for his records. He said, under oath....that anyone can read form the released transcript where he was auditing in the soviet bunker...….."Something went wrong......the actual transcript had been locked away on a secure server, I could not access it.....so using an analog system....I CHANGED...err drafted a transcript."

There is the entire back story....its not rocket science. Vindman realized this was the perfect opportunity use HIS version (the changed from verbatim actual words) to declare that it was Trump that had brought up BURISMA and wanted the investigation re-opened. Being the left wing mole he was, corrupt as hell....he ASSUMED that Mr. Trump would never release the transcript or he would not have locked it away. He could say what he wanted.....IF TRUMP never released actual verbatim transcript. He admitted.....he ATTEMPTED to edit the original transcript to include WHAT HE HEARD.

He leaked his information to ERIC the spy......and the rest is history.

We also learned that SHITFORBRAINS actually revealed that Vindman was the original LEAKER when he stopped the questioning about who Vindman had spoken with after being on the phone call.....

FACE PLANT.

Even the NY times can't figure out a method to SPIN this fact from the RECORD....they attempted to make it appear that he was simply doing a customary EDITING that was part of his normal duties.

We are supposed to believe.....that actual portions of the transcript were omitted because HE SAYS they were omitted....everyone but HE...is confused? Really?

Question? Why did the actual WHISTLEBLOWER.....Eric the spy...conclude in his "official" complaint form letter.....that such transcripts are ALWAYS verbatim transcripts?