Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 79

Thread: The Media coverage of President Trump is now rated at 94% negative.

  1. #31 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,055
    Thanks
    2,436
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 6,202 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 493 Times in 469 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trumpet View Post
    In 2016 Trump conned voters with his populist message, but now many voters are aware of Trump's deception, and also Clinton got 3 million more votes than Trump, and also many people didn't bother coming out to vote in 2016, but now these people will be motivated to come out and vote, now that they know what Trump is. Considering these factors and the fact that Trump is trailing in the polls, I would say that Trump now has got an uphill battle to win in 2020.
    Lol you really are a simpleton. I almost feel sorry for you.
    Every life matters

  2. #32 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    I watch him lie every day, stupid fuck.
    Lying is not an impeachable offense.

    Schiff lies. Hillary lies. Bush lied. Trump has told a few whoppers too (not the ones you think!). Bill Clinton lied. Obama lied. Pelosi lies.

    So you see someone in politics lie. Big hairy deal.

  3. #33 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,784
    Thanks
    30,519
    Thanked 12,926 Times in 11,513 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Of course it’s negative, stupid fuck. They’re reporting the truth.
    No, they lie more than any politician does!

  4. #34 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,967
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    Lying is not an impeachable offense.

    Schiff lies. Hillary lies. Bush lied. Trump has told a few whoppers too (not the ones you think!). Bill Clinton lied. Obama lied. Pelosi lies.

    So you see someone in politics lie. Big hairy deal.
    Gibberishboy, I wasn't referring to impeachment, you illiterate fuck. It was about negative press coverage.

    Fucking moron. Post your gibberish, cunt. It makes more sense than your other posts.

    LSMFT.


  5. #35 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,967
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    No, they lie more than any politician does!
    Nobody lies more than Trump, Gibberishboy.

    Even the RW morons on this forum can't match that pathological liar.

    LSMFT

  6. #36 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,515
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,558 Times in 17,087 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Not negative press, but reporting the news, which shows what a crook and liar Trump is. They are not lying but telling what Trump has done and is continuing to do. Trump is an embarrassment and a crook. How do you spin that as positive or neutral?

  7. #37 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    6,115
    Thanks
    17,760
    Thanked 3,240 Times in 2,333 Posts
    Groans
    97
    Groaned 161 Times in 150 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    The Media coverage of President Trump is now rated at 94% negative.


    Wow, only a 6 % fake news rate. Nice.
    Cool! Last I heard it was 96%! The assholes are slowly coming around!
    “The Communist party must control the guns.”
    ― Mao Tse-tung



    “Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything.”-Generally attributed to Uncle Joe Stalin



    “Everything under heaven is in utter choas; the situation is excellent.”
    ― mao tse-tung

  8. #38 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    28,403
    Thanks
    26,104
    Thanked 11,856 Times in 8,415 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,290 Times in 2,172 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by countryboy View Post
    Lol you really are a simpleton. I almost feel sorry for you.
    Is posting something this stupid, an example of your brilliance?????

  9. #39 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,515
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,558 Times in 17,087 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    Lying is not an impeachable offense.

    Schiff lies. Hillary lies. Bush lied. Trump has told a few whoppers too (not the ones you think!). Bill Clinton lied. Obama lied. Pelosi lies.

    So you see someone in politics lie. Big hairy deal.
    Tell that to Stone. he lied to Congress and courts.
    No Trump is not like other politicians. You could trust them to tell the truth almost all the time and they were not lying to gain some personal advantage. Trump has fractured all the norms for lies. Almost all of us accepted that there were times the president had to fib to keep an operation from getting out or harming an impending deal. That is not what daffy does. Not close.

  10. #40 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,668
    Thanks
    6,593
    Thanked 12,128 Times in 9,658 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 503 Times in 476 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Why did Mueller's 2 1/2 year long, 2500 interview, 26 million dollar investigation NOT find that Trump colluded with the Russians?


    Because you didn't read the conclusion of the report, and especially bottom of pa 173 and top 174.

    The almost 2 year long investigation investigated everything about Russian influence in the election, and splayed that complicated matter out in painstaking detail.
    You IDIOTS ignored that, as well as the fact that the report refused to make findings about Trump's obstruction based on its own fealty
    to a rule regarding indictment of a sitting president. It invited Congress to impeach and stated that it did not exonerate him and also
    found many acts of obstruction but did not delve into Trump's corrupt state of mind in causing the obstruction that he did cause, such as attempting to
    halt investigation or firing officials.

    You are a total idiot and support a criminal, so STFU traitor loser.
    it was all lies.

  11. #41 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,967
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anonymoose View Post
    I've known some really stupid, bad students that graduated from some law school but you could be right. I know he likes to look stuff up in an online legal dictionary, copy and paste Latin legal phrases.
    You must be talking about PMP. Doesn’t even know the definition of perjury. Or the the difference between a witness in court and witnessing an event.

    His 4th tier law school in being shut down. I can see why.

  12. #42 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,967
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    it was all lies.
    FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION

    A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
    B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
    C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
    D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
    E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
    F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
    H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
    I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
    J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
    K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen

    “Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General's recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony. Viewing the acts collectively can help to illuminate their significance. For example, the President's direction to McGahn to have the Special Counsel removed was followed almost immediately by his direction to Lewandowski to tell the Attorney General to limit the scope of the Russia investigation to prospective election-interference only-a temporal connection that suggests that both acts were taken with a related purpose with respect to the investigation.”
    ____________

    Obstruction of justice - 18 USC 1501-1521
    Witness intimidation 18 USC 1512
    Emoluments - US Constitution
    Abuse of power - no statute. Merely reason to be removed from office
    Extortion – 18 USC 112
    Solicitation of something of value from a foreign entity - 11CFR 110.2 and 11 CFR 300.2

    ______________

    Extortion – 4 elements
    Threat – withholding $400 million
    Intent – Forcing public announcement of investigations
    Fear – of loss of funding for defensive weapons against the Russians
    Property – the thing of value is the investigations of 2016 tampering and the Bidens

  13. #43 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,668
    Thanks
    6,593
    Thanked 12,128 Times in 9,658 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 503 Times in 476 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION

    A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
    B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
    C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
    D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
    E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
    F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
    H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
    I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
    J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
    K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen

    “Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General's recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony. Viewing the acts collectively can help to illuminate their significance. For example, the President's direction to McGahn to have the Special Counsel removed was followed almost immediately by his direction to Lewandowski to tell the Attorney General to limit the scope of the Russia investigation to prospective election-interference only-a temporal connection that suggests that both acts were taken with a related purpose with respect to the investigation.”
    ____________

    Obstruction of justice - 18 USC 1501-1521
    Witness intimidation 18 USC 1512
    Emoluments - US Constitution
    Abuse of power - no statute. Merely reason to be removed from office
    Extortion – 18 USC 112
    Solicitation of something of value from a foreign entity - 11CFR 110.2 and 11 CFR 300.2

    ______________

    Extortion – 4 elements
    Threat – withholding $400 million
    Intent – Forcing public announcement of investigations
    Fear – of loss of funding for defensive weapons against the Russians
    Property – the thing of value is the investigations of 2016 tampering and the Bidens
    lies.

  14. #44 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,967
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,173 Times in 10,391 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AssHatZombie View Post
    lies.
    Find one, stupid fuck.

  15. #45 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    71,668
    Thanks
    6,593
    Thanked 12,128 Times in 9,658 Posts
    Groans
    14
    Groaned 503 Times in 476 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Find one, stupid fuck.
    all of it. all lies.

Similar Threads

  1. Media coverage of Mitchell
    By Tkaffen in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-02-2018, 05:53 AM
  2. "GOP views on Trump almost immune to negative coverage"
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-11-2018, 03:53 PM
  3. Obama whines about Trump media coverage
    By Lumberjack in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-06-2016, 02:16 PM
  4. No media coverage on fraud in NY?
    By Chapdog in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-24-2008, 10:25 AM
  5. Media Coverage of Candidates
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-27-2007, 01:35 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •