Jim Jordan rips Dems Star witness to shreds!

[Earl]

If this sham Democrat circus had anyone of integrity (they do not or are afraid), there would be a notice of termination, a summary judgement and there would be an apology forthcoming from these fanatics (which includes most of the radical, Socialist Democrat party) to President Trump who has now been cleared by the Ukrainian Foreign Minister, Vadym Pyrstaiko.

Don’t hold your breath.

Summary Judgement:

“A court order ruling that no factual issues remain to be tried and therefore a cause of action or all causes of action in a complaint can be decided upon certain facts without trial. A summary judgment is based upon a motion by one of the parties that contends that all necessary factual issues are settled or so one-sided they need not be tried. The motion is supported by declarations under oath, excerpts from depositions which are under oath, admissions of fact and other discovery, as well as a legal argument (points and authorities), that argue that there are no triable issues of fact and that the settled facts require a summary judgment for the moving party. The opposing party will respond by counter-declarations and legal arguments attempting to show that there are "triable issues of fact." If it is unclear whether there is a triable issue of fact in any cause of action, then summary judgment must be denied as to that cause of action. The theory behind the summary judgment process is to eliminate the need to try settled factual issues and to decide without trial one or more causes of action in the complaint. The pleading procedures are extremely technical and complicated and are particularly dangerous to the party against whom the motion is made.”
dictionary.law.com

[Micawber]

Jordan has come across as desperate and unhinged.

[MAGA MAN]

You didn’t watch his line of questioning, did you, faggot? It speaks for itself.

Try to explain it in your own words. I'll understand if you cant lol

[Earl]

Jim Jordan rips Dems Star witness to shreds!

Indeed he did.

[Micawber]

Jordan did not sound like a defense attorney, he came off like a Fox editorial whore.

Like, is there a question for the witness in that verbal diarrhea somewhere?

[RB 60]

Jordan did not sound like a defense attorney, he came off like a Fox editorial whore.

Like, is there a question for the witness in that verbal diarrhea somewhere?

Mcslobber trying to make a statement

[Micawber]

His schtick plays with braindead delusional lunchpail trumptards to be sure, but he is wholly ineffective as a persuasive communicator
to sophisticated consumers of high value information, like Congress.

[evince]

Mcslobber trying to make a statement

you are about as good at this as the lawyer they chose


He in fact gave the Honorable witnesses more time to prove how unusual and disruptive the actions of the Trump team was in the Ukraine

[Earl]

Viva Jim Jordan, the “ripper.”

[RB 60]

you are about as good at this as the lawyer they chose


He in fact gave the Honorable witnesses more time to prove how unusual and disruptive the actions of the Trump team was in the Ukraine

Do America a favor, kill yourself!

[Bigdog]

LMAO. He wasn't investigating Biden. He wasn't doing an honest investigation into anyone.

Then why did Zlochevsky flee?

[PostmodernProphet]

LMAO. He wasn't investigating Biden. He wasn't doing an honest investigation into anyone.

sounds like Schiff and Pelosi.....

[Earl]

Hans von Spakovsky: Trump impeachment not justified by evidence and testimony made public so far
Hans A. von Spakovsky
By Hans A. von Spakovsky | Fox News:


"Democrats and Republicans battle over 'hearsay' during impeachment hearings

House Oversight Committee members Rep. Mark Meadows and Rep. Jim Jordan weighs in on impeachment proceedings on 'Hannity.'

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., hasn’t yet produced most of his witnesses in the public impeachment hearings regarding President Trump. But if the State Department’s George Kent and Acting Ambassador to Ukraine William Taylor are representative of the testimony Democrats are relying on, future historians may label this episode The Big Impeachment Blowout.

The House impeachment inquiry is not a criminal proceeding. But as I listened to the hearsay and speculation that Kent and Taylor were offering Wednesday at the opening public hearing on impeachment, I couldn’t help thinking of REO Speedwagon’s song “Take it on the Run.”

One line of the song says: “Heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend who heard it from another you been messin’ around.”

YOVANOVITCH TO FACE GOP GRILLING ON SECOND DAY OF PUBLIC IMPEACHMENT HEARINGS

Both Kent and Taylor admitted they never talked to President Trump and only heard third-hand what supposedly occurred in the president’s July 25 telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
More from Opinion

Jason Chaffetz: Why Schiff's whistleblower claims at Trump impeachment hearing are impossible to believe
Rep. Steve Scalise: Trump impeachment inquiry requires the truth – America must hear from whistleblower

Democrats seem to have dropped the quid pro quo claim, since there was no evidence of it in the rough transcript the White House released of the call. The claim does not seem to be playing with the American public.

Taylor admitted in the hearing that Zelensky had no idea that U.S. aid was being delayed, and Zelensky himself has said there was no quid pro quo.

Democrats have now switched to using the terms “bribery” and “extortion,” no doubt because those terms sound more sinister, despite the fact that they’ve produced no evidence – so far – that would come even close to showing a violation of the federal laws defining bribery and extortion."
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/hans...-public-so-far

[Bigdog]

sounds like Schiff and Pelosi.....

Democrats are selling fairy tales to millenials.

[Bigdog]

Says who? It was their business decision, apparently they thought it was money well-spent and it has nothing to do with anyone else.

Remind me when the repubs in Congress raised the alarm about HB before trump infested the WH. They had the majority at the time.

Shokin was investigating the Ukrainian oligarch that owns Burisma and Joe Biden.

"At the end of 2014, Zlochevsky fled Ukraine amid allegations of unlawful self enrichment and legalization of funds"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mykola_Zlochevsky

Establishment repubs did everything they could to prevent Outsider Trump from winning.

.