Page 22 of 25 FirstFirst ... 121819202122232425 LastLast
Results 316 to 330 of 364

Thread: SCHIFF JUST SAID "HE DOESN'T KNOW THE 'WHISTLEBLOWER' "..MORE LIES

  1. #316 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    When bribery also is proven false (and it pretty much has been), what will be the next accusation? And the one after that?
    It's blatantly obvious, stupid cunt. This is an article of impeachment, you ignorant cunt. How many times does that have to be explained to you?

    Willfully ignorant moron.

  2. The Following User Groans At domer76 For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (11-15-2019)

  3. #317 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    Why shouldn't the whistleblower be questioned? Wasn't it him/her who made the accusation?
    You accuse me of being a faggot, I say you're a liar. Prove it's me who's lying, dickhead.
    Faggot. The WB has been corroborated by several witnesses. No need to out him when other sources are available.

    The law gives him/her protection. Why do you hate the law?

  4. The Following User Groans At domer76 For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (11-15-2019)

  5. #318 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,021
    Thanks
    9,528
    Thanked 22,512 Times in 16,974 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    It's blatantly obvious, stupid cunt. This is an article of impeachment, you ignorant cunt. How many times does that have to be explained to you?

    Willfully ignorant moron.
    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Faggot. The WB has been corroborated by several witnesses. No need to out him when other sources are available.

    The law gives him/her protection. Why do you hate the law?
    Bullshit. It's all hearsay, dickhead.

    Prove I'm a faggot. I say you're a flat out liar, you perverted cunt.
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  6. #319 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Let’s try this again, illiterate cunt.
    YALIF.
    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Impeachment IS NOT A CRIMINAL CHARGE.
    It most certainly is. That is the purpose of an impeachment, to declare the criminal charges for the following trial. Try English. It works better.
    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Rules of evidence, 5th Amendment rights don’t apply, regardless of whether you stupid fucks think so or not.
    Yes they do. They always apply. They are never suspended.
    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    The President cannot be criminally charged.
    No? Guess the House is just going through the motions, then! You say they have no power to impeach!
    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    So, whatever the actual claims are made against him, bribery or extortion, they still are not criminal.
    Claims are not crimes (unless they are libel).
    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Bribery has been chosen because it’s specifically in the Constitution and is easier for dumbfucks of your massive stupidity to grasp than quid pro quo
    What bribery? From whom? When?

  7. #320 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    It's blatantly obvious, stupid cunt. This is an article of impeachment, you ignorant cunt. How many times does that have to be explained to you?

    Willfully ignorant moron.
    What is obvious? There has been no impeachment, so there are no articles of impeachment. It is YOU that is hallucinating here.

  8. #321 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Faggot. The WB has been corroborated by several witnesses. No need to out him when other sources are available.

    The law gives him/her protection. Why do you hate the law?
    What witnesses?

    You say hearsay is valid testimony sufficient to convict someone.

    I heard you are beating your wife mercilessly. You are therefore guilty. Q.E.D.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Into the Night For This Post:

    gfm7175 (11-15-2019)

  10. #322 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Posts
    76,854
    Thanks
    30,538
    Thanked 12,939 Times in 11,525 Posts
    Groans
    11
    Groaned 1,361 Times in 1,347 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Faggot. The WB has been corroborated by several witnesses. No need to out him when other sources are available.

    The law gives him/her protection. Why do you hate the law?
    No such law. You are hallucinating again.

  11. #323 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    53,523
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 24,567 Times in 17,094 Posts
    Groans
    5,280
    Groaned 4,575 Times in 4,254 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    What witnesses?

    You say hearsay is valid testimony sufficient to convict someone.

    I heard you are beating your wife mercilessly. You are therefore guilty. Q.E.D.
    In this case, there are 15 people who are deeply involved who back the whistleblower information. This is not a trial. that is what the Senate will do. This is a gathering of evidence. At the end of the house investigation, Trump will not be found innocent or guilty. They will just say the House sees enough evidence of wrongdoing they will refer it to the Senate for a trial.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Nordberg For This Post:

    domer76 (11-15-2019)

  13. #324 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RB 60 View Post
    Bullshit. It's all hearsay, dickhead.

    Prove I'm a faggot. I say you're a flat out liar, you perverted cunt.
    Faggot. This ISN'T A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING.

    I can't dumb it down for you any more than that.

    Fucking ignorant moron.

  14. The Following User Groans At domer76 For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (11-15-2019)

  15. #325 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    YALIF.

    It most certainly is. That is the purpose of an impeachment, to declare the criminal charges for the following trial. Try English. It works better.

    Yes they do. They always apply. They are never suspended.

    No? Guess the House is just going through the motions, then! You say they have no power to impeach!

    Claims are not crimes (unless they are libel).

    What bribery? From whom? When?


    Gibberishboy


  16. The Following User Groans At domer76 For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (11-15-2019)

  17. #326 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    What is obvious? There has been no impeachment, so there are no articles of impeachment. It is YOU that is hallucinating here.


    Gibberishboy


  18. The Following User Groans At domer76 For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (11-15-2019)

  19. #327 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    What witnesses?

    You say hearsay is valid testimony sufficient to convict someone.

    I heard you are beating your wife mercilessly. You are therefore guilty. Q.E.D.


    Ignorant Gibberishboy. Doesn't know impeachment from criminal matters.

    LSMFT


  20. The Following User Groans At domer76 For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (11-15-2019)

  21. #328 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    In this case, there are 15 people who are deeply involved who back the whistleblower information. This is not a trial. that is what the Senate will do. This is a gathering of evidence. At the end of the house investigation, Trump will not be found innocent or guilty. They will just say the House sees enough evidence of wrongdoing they will refer it to the Senate for a trial.
    COLLUSION

    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  22. #329 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    48,976
    Thanks
    12,111
    Thanked 14,175 Times in 10,393 Posts
    Groans
    45
    Groaned 4,876 Times in 4,194 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Into the Night View Post
    No such law. You are hallucinating again.
    Do whistle-blowers have a right to remain anonymous?

    "Only in a limited way. Another part of the Inspector General Act says that agency watchdogs “shall not, after receipt of a complaint or information from an employee, disclose the identity of the employee without the consent of the employee, unless the inspector general determines such disclosure is unavoidable.”

    In line with that law, the inspector general for the intelligence community, Michael Atkinson, did not include the whistle-blower’s name in his report to the acting director of national intelligence, Joseph Maguire. Mr. Maguire testified last week that he did not know the name of the person, whom people familiar with the matter have identified as a C.I.A. officer who was detailed to the White House at one point."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/03/u...complaint.html

    (b) The Inspector General shall not, after receipt of a complaint or information from an employee, disclose the identity of the employee without the consent of the employee, unless the Inspector General determines such disclosure is unavoidable during the course of the investigation."

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/h...7----000-.html

  23. The Following User Groans At domer76 For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (11-15-2019)

  24. #330 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Living in rural America, "clinging to guns and religion"
    Posts
    43,021
    Thanks
    9,528
    Thanked 22,512 Times in 16,974 Posts
    Groans
    134
    Groaned 522 Times in 502 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    Faggot. This ISN'T A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING.

    I can't dumb it down for you any more than that.

    Fucking ignorant moron.
    Look asshole, you call me a faggot, the burden of proof is on you. Prove it.

    Your scum bag Shiff won't produce the accuser. Why not? Does he have
    some shit on the Dems too and their scared to have him questioned?

    I say you're a scrawny little runt that didn't have the balls to stick up
    for yourself when you were picked on as a child, and probably through
    adulthood with your infantile clamor and arrogance. Grow up, little one.
    Common sense is not a gift, it's a punishment because you have to deal with everyone who doesn't have it.

  25. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RB 60 For This Post:

    Into the Night (11-15-2019), Sailor (11-15-2019), USFREEDOM911 (11-15-2019)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-14-2019, 02:45 PM
  2. Replies: 49
    Last Post: 10-08-2019, 02:36 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-01-2019, 11:59 AM
  4. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 04-02-2019, 02:23 PM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-10-2017, 08:16 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •