Darth Omar (12-04-2019)
Darth Omar (12-04-2019)
Matt Gaetz sounded like a conservative radio talking points guy.
Completely hateful, he got this really mean look on his face like he thought he was talking to the devil. Great acting job!
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
christiefan915 (12-04-2019)
BLUEXITA Modest Proposal For Separating Blue States From Red
Dear Red-State Trump Voter,
Let’s face it, guys: We’re done.
It is a tragedy that so much of the work that so many men and women toiled at for so long to make this a better country, and a better world, has been thrown away, leaving us all in such needless peril.
This is why our separation in all but name is necessary.
https://newrepublic.com/article/1409...mp-red-america
PoliTalker (12-04-2019)
Lieu nailed it.
He showed that conditioning the aid on an announcement of investigation is bribery, and not only meets the Constitutional definition with regard to impeachment, but it also actually meets the criminal definition.
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
I'd like to chime in on Turley's misrepresentation of what constitutes assent or an agreement and the requirement of proof.
I will use an example of a valid contract:
I walk into a crowded grocer that I frequent, the line is long with many people in line with carts full. I only have a single apple.
I catch the grocers eye and point to the apple as I walk towards the exit, and I point to the apple and he looks at me
and nods and I exit, neither having said a word to the other, much less having declared a "quid pro quo," negotiated the price, or paid the consideration.
Yet I have just entered into a legally binding contract to pay a reasonable price to the grocer for an apple. I didn't say, I'm tired and I just want an
apple can I have it and pay you later. He didn't say, OK, that's reasonable, I hereby sell you the apple. I don't need Trump to have SAID
quid pro quo. I don't need to have Zelensky affirm he understood Trump to mean quid pro quo. I can, do and will infer the meaning based
upon the totality of the circumstances and what people said he said, how he acts, Trump's custom and practices etc etc...
The transcript MORE than establishes a quid pro quo demand under existing legal theory, not that Turley or Gaetz should care about the law or anything.
None of you clown Repukes get this because Trump may as well be your baby boy in a murder trial and you don't WANT to believe it.
christiefan915 (12-04-2019), PoliTalker (12-04-2019)
Bookmarks