Trump trying to FIRE INSP GEN who said whistleblower report was CREDIBLE & URGENT

[Centerleftfl]

Now why do you suppose Trump wants to fire the guy? Another conspirator of the deep state? Just because an MSNBC anchor can read doesn't mean it isn't TRUE.

Trump trying to fire inspector general is a confession he ‘did something criminal’: Nicolle Wallace

Published 3 mins ago on November 12, 2019By Bob Brigham

MSNBC anchor Nicolle Wallace on Tuesday explained why President Donald Trump attempting to fire inspector general who validated the White House whistleblower complaint.

“We’re back with breaking news from The New York Times that could have implications for Donald Trump’s impeachment,” Wallace reported. “Donald Trump, based on a new report in The Times has considered firing the inspector general — the one who looked at the whistleblower’s complaint on Donald Trump’s Ukraine conduct and deemed it credible and urgent.”

“President Trump has discussed dismissing the intelligence community’s inspector general, Michael Atkinson, because Mr. Atkinson reported a whistleblower’s complaint about Mr. Trump’s interactions with Ukraine to Congress after concluding it was credible, according to four people familiar with the discussions,” The Times reported. “Mr. Trump first expressed his dismay about Mr. Atkinson around the time the whistleblower’s complaint became ...

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/tru...colle-wallace/

[Centerleftfl]

Bumping

[Centerleftfl]

On Tuesday’s edition of CNN’s “Cuomo Prime Time,” anchor Chris Cuomo pushed back on GOP lobbyist and American Conservative Union director Matt Schlapp for saying President Donald Trump has the right to fire Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson for transmitting the whistleblower complaint.

“Why would it be okay for the president to go after the inspector general for dealing with the whistleblower?” said Cuomo.

“Because he serves at the pleasure of the president. The president can get rid of them at any time,” said Schlapp. “At the State Department during Obama’s presidency, during the whole time Hillary was at the State Department, he didn’t bother to pick an IG.”

“Does the reason why you get rid of somebody, if it’s because he’s seen as disloyal for finding the whistleblower credible, does that color your determination?” said Cuomo.

“No, the president has the right to remove you for whatever reason you want,” insisted Schlapp. “It’s the reason the president may publish the transcript so every American can read what went down in that conversation. He’s going to release the first conversation he had with the president of Ukraine later this week.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/cnn...ector-general/

[Minister of Truth]

If the IC IG wants to participate in DNC conspiracy theories, then fire him.

[Gonzomin]

The IG did a terrible thing. He got a whistleblower complaint and then checked to see if it was legitimate. That is his job. Since Trump does not like the results, he should fire him and everyone in the department to make sure another person will not do his job. The Whistleblower was correct about what he reported. To rightys, the report should have been burned. Trump does no wrong.

[rjhenn]

If the IC IG wants to participate in DNC conspiracy theories, then fire him.

Basically, you're saying that it's legitimate to fire somebody for doing their job. IOW, their only loyalty should be to Trump. Yes, there is a swamp, and it works for Trump.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[rjhenn]

On Tuesday’s edition of CNN’s “Cuomo Prime Time,” anchor Chris Cuomo pushed back on GOP lobbyist and American Conservative Union director Matt Schlapp for saying President Donald Trump has the right to fire Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson for transmitting the whistleblower complaint.

“Why would it be okay for the president to go after the inspector general for dealing with the whistleblower?” said Cuomo.

“Because he serves at the pleasure of the president. The president can get rid of them at any time,” said Schlapp. “At the State Department during Obama’s presidency, during the whole time Hillary was at the State Department, he didn’t bother to pick an IG.”

“Does the reason why you get rid of somebody, if it’s because he’s seen as disloyal for finding the whistleblower credible, does that color your determination?” said Cuomo.

“No, the president has the right to remove you for whatever reason you want,” insisted Schlapp. “It’s the reason the president may publish the transcript so every American can read what went down in that conversation. He’s going to release the first conversation he had with the president of Ukraine later this week.”

https://www.rawstory.com/2019/11/cnn...ector-general/

Trump is going to release the transcript after he's had a chance to alter it to make himself look good.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[rjhenn]

The IG did a terrible thing. He got a whistleblower complaint and then checked to see if it was legitimate. That is his job. Since Trump does not like the results, he should fire him and everyone in the department to make sure another person will not do his job. The Whistleblower was correct about what he reported. To rightys, the report should have been burned. Trump does no wrong.

Exactly. One is not permitted to criticize or offend the leader of your cult.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[dukkha]

Bumping

bumping raw sewage

[dukkha]

Nichole Wallace is fake news - she went apeshit after Trump won ...

Notice the NYTimes article is long on innuendo and short on citations.

The IC IG fucked up when he took the WB complaint from a lawyers brief instead of the WB himself.
Moreover the WB is just another political axe job by the Dems coordinating with the atty Zaid .

Zaid has had a pathological desire to impeach Trump from day 1.
These are not noble figures acting out of patriotism. They are political hacks and upset diplomats

[dukkha]

If the IC IG wants to participate in DNC conspiracy theories, then fire him.

why did the IG allow 2nd hand info? why did the administrative law change so conveniently in time to do so?

[Centerleftfl]

Nichole Wallace is fake news - she went apeshit after Trump won ...

Notice the NYTimes article is long on innuendo and short on citations.

The IC IG fucked up when he took the WB complaint from a lawyers brief instead of the WB himself.
Moreover the WB is just another political axe job by the Dems coordinating with the atty Zaid .

Zaid has had a pathological desire to impeach Trump from day 1.
These are not noble figures acting out of patriotism. They are political hacks and upset diplomats

Fake news from fake reporters using real "hacks" reporting fake stories of fake people's participation with fake admissions of fake crimes, with fake witnesses, giving fake testimony, doing fake investigations using faked documents by fake prosecutors, in front of fake judges, issuing fake subpoenas to issue fake indictments, taking fake plea deals and getting fake JAIL sentences.

Just one big FAKE reality show produced and staged by a deep state of unpatritioc FAKERS with Trump as the STAR or is it "target".

Sure!

[Getin the ring]

Fake news, innuendo from political and news hacks. And yet all these HACKS and fake news stories involve investigations LITIGATED by federal attorneys, NUMEROUS judges involved, subpoenas issued, indictments plea deals and JAIL sentences stemming from on all this FAKE NEWS and political HACKS.

Okay, if YOU say so.

[Centerleftfl]

The good WITCH? You really wanna use that metaphor for a 'WITCHhunt'?

[Minister of Truth]

Basically, you're saying that it's legitimate to fire somebody for doing their job. IOW, their only loyalty should be to Trump. Yes, there is a swamp, and it works for Trump.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Is it his job to work for the DNC or for real Americans?