Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 50 of 50

Thread: Townhall takes the leap

  1. #46 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    68,352
    Thanks
    18,375
    Thanked 18,674 Times in 14,047 Posts
    Groans
    628
    Groaned 1,136 Times in 1,080 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nordberg View Post
    This is an impeachment hearing. Biden has nothing to do with it. There is no reason to call Biden, his son or any of the witnesses the reds want. It is a typical Repub deflection.
    I would suggest the Repugs start their own investigation but that is what Barr, the pretend AG, is doing.
    The whole point of the hearing is to cover for Quid Pro Joe's hearing.

  2. #47 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    of course......why pretend its an investigation.....they only want evidence that feeds their expectations.......
    When all they have a hammers, all they can see are nails.

    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  3. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    dukkha (11-12-2019)

  4. #48 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Not true, BenghaziGate was conducted the exact same way, all of those investigations had private testimony employing the exact same rules that Schiff is using today, in fact, they initiated those rules. In Clinton's impeachment, they didn't have a preliminary inquiry because Starr gave them four years of investigation, all of it conducted behind closed doors. And in that impeachment, just like today, the majority ruled over everything

    John Solomon is a talking head, nothing more, of course he has a conspiracy, had any demogogue not have "proof" of something, but even Volker shot down Solomon's fiction in his testimony

    The IG did know that the whistleblower had contacted Schiff's office and that Schiff's office recommended he talk to an attorney, and anyone who worked in or near the White House longer than three years had "worked" for Biden just like they are now working for Pence, it is part of their job

    Nothing, absolutely nothing, "screams for an investigation," and asking for Biden's son to testify is nothing more than a deflection, it ain't about Biden, it is all about Trump, he is the one who abused his power
    John Solomon was consistently right in calling the Russian Hoax; never once, did he breathlessly—and falsely, claim ‘the walls were closing in on Donald Trump’ as so many of our other ‘journalists’ have in the past three years.

    IOW, he’s an excellent source.

    At any rate, you blew right through a Stop Sign. Why would Ciaramella go to Schiff AT ALL? Why is Adam Schiff necessary to file a WB report? The only necessary components to a WB report are the WB and the office of the IG.

    But we have this Schiff appendage hanging around in Ciaramella’s report. What business does Schiff have doing there? Did Ciamarella need some ‘advice’ from Schiff? If so, what kind of advice? A WB shouldn’t need any ‘advice’. If their report is in error nothing happens to them—the whole point is to keep it secret. But in Ciamarella’s case he involved other people in crafting his report.

    Why did Ciaramella go to Adam Schiff when Schiff has been trying to impeach Trump for years; he has *falsely* claimed to have slam dunk evidence of Russian collusion and has done so REPEATEDLY, right in front of national television cameras. So when Schiff claims he didn’t meet with Ciaramella, lots of voters are skeptical of the claim.

    And we aren’t allowed to ask Ciamarella any questions?

    Really lol?

    Here’s my advice to House Democrats if they are actually serious about doing anything more than hanging the label ‘impeached’ around Trumps neck.

    Number One: get rid of Adam Schiff. Like, today. The inveterate liar shouldn’t be allowed within a ten mile radius an impeachment proceeding involving Trump.

    Number Two: since Democrats didn’t do Step One, Schiff needs put under oath. And it’s not negotiable since Pelosi stood by while Schiff made himself a fact witness. Same ditto for Ciaramella: since his interactions with Schiff and/or Team Schiff make him something besides a garden variety WB, Ciaramella needs to come before Congress and testify under oath.

    Of course, House democrats don’t need to do these things. On the other hand, since they won’t, Senate republicans will be justified in declaring the whole thing DOA the minute it gets to the Senate. Democrats need to understand they will take a political hit when that happens.

    Which will make it a just another colossal waste of time by the Resistance.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  5. #49 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by USFREEDOM911 View Post
    When all they have a hammers, all they can see are nails.

    It’s quite conceivable we’ll be hearing more of that *proper* word in the coming months.

    It’s not treason—it’s sedition.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (11-12-2019)

  7. #50 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    74,838
    Thanks
    15,266
    Thanked 14,432 Times in 12,044 Posts
    Groans
    18,546
    Groaned 1,699 Times in 1,647 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    It’s quite conceivable we’ll be hearing more of that *proper* word in the coming months.

    It’s not treason—it’s sedition.
    The liberal congress critters handling of all this, brings this to mind:

    From THE UNTOUCHABLES

    Judge: [after Ness has discovered Capone bribed the jury to acquit him] Bailiff, I want you to go next door to Judge Hawton's court, where they've just begun hearing a divorce action. I want you to bring that jury in here, and take this jury to his court. Bailiff, are those instructions clear?

    Bailiff: [puzzled] Yes, sir, they're... clear...

    Capone: [to his attorney] What's he talking about? What is it?

    Judge: Bailiff, I want you to switch the juries.

    Bailiff: Yes sir.

    Defense Attorney: Your honor, I object!

    Judge: Overruled.

    District Attorney: [when the Judge announces the switch of jury] What did you tell him?

    Ness: I told him his name is in the ledger too.

    [Close-up of the Judge, staring daggers at Ness from the bench]

    District Attorney: His name wasn't in the ledger...
    SEDITION: incitement of resistance to or insurrection against lawful authority.


  8. The Following User Says Thank You to USFREEDOM911 For This Post:

    Darth Omar (11-12-2019)

Similar Threads

  1. Attacks on Syria and Bashar Assad rejected by McCain townhall audiences
    By wordcreatorushtwf in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-07-2013, 08:12 PM
  2. Will the defenders of the 1% leap into action again?
    By Guns Guns Guns in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-31-2012, 09:15 AM
  3. Leap Day...
    By Damocles in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 02-29-2012, 07:00 PM
  4. AARP Reacts to President’s Health Care Townhall
    By Topspin in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-12-2009, 05:54 AM
  5. Feminism's Leap Forward
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 09-10-2008, 01:39 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •