Thought I'd help out the Trumpkins, keep them updated on their deflections;

[domer76]

We have the transcript, and myriad other evidence. Give it up, impeachment is over.

Impeachment is inevitable, stupid fuck.

[canceled.2021.2]

You must really enjoy sucking Trump's dick. You do it every day and with such passion. I'm impressed.

Is this the face he makes when you bring him to climax?

Is this supposed to be a cogent and relevant argument?

[Darth Omar]

Impeachment is inevitable, stupid fuck.

You can’t help yourself with the predictions can you lol.

Is there like a Prediction Hot Line you can call?

[PoliTalker]

Hello archives,

"How Republican Defenses of Trump on Impeachment Have Shifted Over Time"
https://time.com/5721031/republicans...wsletter-brief

No Quid Pro Qou to Attacking the process to Undermining the credibility of witnesses to May have been quid pro quo, but that is not impeachable

Problem is that none of them are on the same page, Trump could undercut their "defense" the next day, today he said he didn't think public hearings should occur after his lackeys have been screaming for public hearings

Trying to make sense out of what Trump says is like trying to build a house of cards in a hurricane.

Every time you think you're getting somewhere you have to start all over again.

[domer76]

You can’t help yourself with the predictions can you lol.

Is there like a Prediction Hot Line you can call?

Do you really think the House won’t impeach, dumbfuck?

[Darth Omar]

Do you really think the House won’t impeach, dumbfuck?

I don’t know lol.

[dukkha]

I already made these points a bunch of times. Russia offered Trump help, Trump accepted, they had a secret meeting, and Russia hacked the DNC server to help Trump. If you want a more in-depth look, watch the video.



Well, what would you call it? Trump withheld money in return for dirt on a political opponent. Is that not extortion?

you forgot the meeting was walked out on, and Mueller said there was insufficient evidence for collusion.
But if you think you know more then Mueller....i'm not surprised;

Moreover you write like it was a linear step by step process -it wasn't. also there are real indications that the DNC asn't hacked by da Russian ( Crowdstrike) faulty ID of malware)
But i'm not about to get into that given your facile reasoning - would be a gigantic further waste of my time

[Tranquillus in Exile]

Weeks and weeks of "the process should be done in public!" Then Saint Trump, I guess unaware of the current narrative, says the process should be private. Now all of his stooges need to flip to the new narrative.

In a letter first published by Fox News, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) wrote to Rep. Schiff (D-CA) on Friday to demand that he appear before the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight committees for a private deposition.

https://www.newsweek.com/republicans...aining-1470779

[Darth Omar]

In a letter first published by Fox News, Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) wrote to Rep. Schiff (D-CA) on Friday to demand that he appear before the House Intelligence, Foreign Affairs and Oversight committees for a private deposition.

https://www.newsweek.com/republicans...aining-1470779

Shifty won’t get to testify under oath in private if this does get to the Senate.

I also saw where republicans are going to call the WB and Hunter Biden for the televised clown circus. That would seem to put democrats in a spot: clearly, they don’t want either to testify in front of republicans on TV. Especially Hunter, because for all democrats know, Hunter may have things he’d rather not discuss. Second thought—they probably do know.

But if Schiff doesn’t allow them to testify, that’s just more justification for republicans to call it a partisan Witch Hunt. Which it appears to be, based on the recent ‘test balloon’ vote.

What does one do lol?

[Micawber]

Impeachment is inevitable, stupid fuck.

For them denial is just another form of deflection. Facts are attacks, the best way to fend of a fact
is to merely gainsay it. It's like Monte Python and the argument clinic skit where the guy simply controverts
everything instead of arguing, including the observation that he is merely contradicting and not arguing.

[domer76]

you forgot the meeting was walked out on, and Mueller said there was insufficient evidence for collusion.
But if you think you know more then Mueller....i'm not surprised;

Moreover you write like it was a linear step by step process -it wasn't. also there are real indications that the DNC asn't hacked by da Russian ( Crowdstrike) faulty ID of malware)
But i'm not about to get into that given your facile reasoning - would be a gigantic further waste of my time

FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION

A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen

“Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General's recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony. Viewing the acts collectively can help to illuminate their significance. For example, the President's direction to McGahn to have the Special Counsel removed was followed almost immediately by his direction to Lewandowski to tell the Attorney General to limit the scope of the Russia investigation to prospective election-interference only-a temporal connection that suggests that both acts were taken with a related purpose with respect to the investigation.”
____________

Obstruction of justice - 18 USC 1501-1521
Witness intimidation 18 USC 1512
Emoluments - US Constitution
Abuse of power - no statute. Merely reason to be removed from office
Extortion – 18 USC 112
Solicitation of something of value from a foreign entity - 11CFR 110.2 and 11 CFR 300.2

______________

Extortion – 4 elements
Threat – withholding $400 million
Intent – Forcing public announcement of investigations
Fear – of loss of funding for defensive weapons against the Russians
Property – the thing of value is the investigations of 2016 tampering and the Bidens

[dukkha]

FACTUAL RESULTS OF THE OBSTRUCTION INVESTIGATION

A. The Campaign's Response to Reports About Russian Support for Trump
B. The President's Conduct Concerning the Investigation of Michael Flynn
C. The President's Reaction to Public Confirmation of the FBl's Russia Investigation
D. Events Leading Up To and Surrounding the Termination of FBI Director Corney
E. The President's Efforts to Remove the Special Counsel
F. The President's Efforts to Curtail the Special Counsel Investigation
H. The President's Further Efforts to Have the Attorney General Take Over the Investigation
I. The President Orders McGahn to Deny that the President Tried to Fire the Special Counsel
J. The President's Conduct Towards Flynn, Manafort,
K. The President's Conduct Involving Michael Cohen

“Our investigation found multiple acts by the President that were capable of exerting undue influence over law enforcement investigations, including the Russian-interference and obstruction investigations. The incidents were often carried out through one-on-one meetings in which the President sought to use his official power outside of usual channels. These actions ranged from efforts to remove the Special Counsel and to reverse the effect of the Attorney General's recusal; to the attempted use of official power to limit the scope of the investigation; to direct and indirect contacts with witnesses with the potential to influence their testimony. Viewing the acts collectively can help to illuminate their significance. For example, the President's direction to McGahn to have the Special Counsel removed was followed almost immediately by his direction to Lewandowski to tell the Attorney General to limit the scope of the Russia investigation to prospective election-interference only-a temporal connection that suggests that both acts were taken with a related purpose with respect to the investigation.”
____________

Obstruction of justice - 18 USC 1501-1521
Witness intimidation 18 USC 1512
Emoluments - US Constitution
Abuse of power - no statute. Merely reason to be removed from office
Extortion – 18 USC 112
Solicitation of something of value from a foreign entity - 11CFR 110.2 and 11 CFR 300.2

______________

Extortion – 4 elements
Threat – withholding $400 million
Intent – Forcing public announcement of investigations
Fear – of loss of funding for defensive weapons against the Russians
Property – the thing of value is the investigations of 2016 tampering and the Bidens

[Stretch]

You can’t help yourself with the predictions can you lol.

Is there like a Prediction Hot Line you can call?

1-800-jackass

[StoneByStone]

you forgot the meeting was walked out on, and Mueller said there was insufficient evidence for collusion.
But if you think you know more then Mueller....i'm not surprised;

Once again, watch the video.

Moreover you write like it was a linear step by step process -it wasn't. also there are real indications that the DNC asn't hacked by da Russian ( Crowdstrike) faulty ID of malware)
But i'm not about to get into that given your facile reasoning - would be a gigantic further waste of my time

Why is the Right so prone to conspiracy theories?

[archives]

Shifty won’t get to testify under oath in private if this does get to the Senate.

I also saw where republicans are going to call the WB and Hunter Biden for the televised clown circus. That would seem to put democrats in a spot: clearly, they don’t want either to testify in front of republicans on TV. Especially Hunter, because for all democrats know, Hunter may have things he’d rather not discuss. Second thought—they probably do know.

But if Schiff doesn’t allow them to testify, that’s just more justification for republicans to call it a partisan Witch Hunt. Which it appears to be, based on the recent ‘test balloon’ vote.

What does one do lol?

They did call Biden's son as a witness, along with several other unrelated requests, which will all be turned down by the majority. They knew they would be rejected, should have been, all part of the GOP game plan to attack the process, but it ain't working, and will be further forgotten if the witnesses go on live TV and expose Trump