Bipartisan support for opposing the sham impeachment process

[canceled.2021.2]

The cunt Nancy Pelosi couldn't even get her entire caucus to vote YES.

How embarrassing

[Celticguy]

Much less even attempt a vote that matters.

Going to make the Mueller fizzle out seem zesty.

SMH

[LV426]

The cunt Nancy Pelosi couldn't even get her entire caucus to vote YES.How embarrassing

1. You're referring to the two Democrats out of 233 who voted no?

2. You literally LOST a Congressman (Amash) who ditched the GOP and voted to impeach.

3. There's no way you or any Conservative is going to be able to defend Trump in public hearings. None. You can't even defend him here, and the Cons in Congress are just as stupid as you.

[LV426]

Much less even attempt a vote that matters.
Going to make the Mueller fizzle out seem zesty.
SMH

So, at first, you didn't think the Democrats would win the House last year.

THEN, you said they wouldn't launch an impeach inquiry, even though they did.

THEN, you said they wouldn't hold any vote on impeachment, which they just did today.

NOW, you're saying they won't even attempt a vote "that matters"...so when they do, I expect you to move the bar again.

How many times are you going to keep pushing the goalposts until you just admit you got conned?

[canceled.2021.2]

1. You're referring to the two Democrats out of 233 who voted no?

2. You literally LOST a Congressman (Amash) who ditched the GOP and voted to impeach.

3. There's no way you or any Conservative is going to be able to defend Trump in public hearings. None. You can't even defend him here, and the Cons in Congress are just as stupid as you.

My statement is 100% accurate

Amash is an independent and might as well be a democrat

Nancy lost two of her caucus

Bipartisan vote against impeachment inquiry. That's a fact jack

[Trumpet]

The cunt Nancy Pelosi couldn't even get her entire caucus to vote YES.

How embarrassing

Oh dear me, that naughty naughty Nancy.

[LV426]

My statement is 100% accurate

LOL! Yes, the bar is 100% on the floor. Congrats.

Amash is an independent and might as well be a democrat

But he was a Republican until just recently, and has voted with Trump 80% of the time in this current Congress.

Why did he leave?

Nancy lost two of her caucus

You lost 42 last year. And one again this year. So that's a total of 43.

Bipartisan vote against impeachment inquiry. That's a fact jack

Hang your hat on that, then. I'm sure it'll give you comfort as the House votes on articles of impeachment and you have no one to stick up for your defense.

[canceled.2021.2]

LOL! Yes, the bar is 100% on the floor. Congrats.




But he was a Republican until just recently, and has voted with Trump 80% of the time in this current Congress.

Why did he leave?




You lost 42 last year. And one again this year. So that's a total of 43.




Hang your hat on that, then. I'm sure it'll give you comfort as the House votes on articles of impeachment and you have no one to stick up for your defense.

Nancy has until December 12th to vote on articles of impeachment or it isn't going to happen. I stand firm on that

[StoneByStone]

My statement is 100% accurate

Amash is an independent and might as well be a democrat

Nancy lost two of her caucus

Bipartisan vote against impeachment inquiry. That's a fact jack

2 out of 233 makes it bipartisan? That's that conservatard math.

[Celticguy]

So, at first, you didn't think the Democrats would win the House last year.

THEN, you said they wouldn't launch an impeach inquiry, even though they did.

THEN, you said they wouldn't hold any vote on impeachment, which they just did today.

NOW, you're saying they won't even attempt a vote "that matters"...so when they do, I expect you to move the bar again.

How many times are you going to keep pushing the goalposts until you just admit you got conned?

The impeachment votes ghey have taken failed soundly

[CFM]

The cunt Nancy Pelosi couldn't even get her entire caucus to vote YES.

How embarrassing

What's embarrassing is that members of her caucus were talking about impeachment before Trump took office in January, 2017. To do so would mean there would be no needs for hearing because, surely, they wouldn't have made such calls unless they had proof.

[archives]

Nancy has until December 12th to vote on articles of impeachment or it isn't going to happen. I stand firm on that

Why does she only have till December 12th to vote on articles of impeachment?

You are aware the 116th Congress does adjourns once again after the holidays

[archives]

What's embarrassing is that members of her caucus were talking about impeachment before Trump took office in January, 2017. To do so would mean there would be no needs for hearing because, surely, they wouldn't have made such calls unless they had proof.

Members of any caucus talk about impeaching the President no matter who is President, Obama had numerous GOP Congressmen talking impeachment just as Bush experienced Democrats in the House calling for impeachment, it is normal, there are always disgruntled Congressmen

[archives]

The impeachment votes ghey have taken failed soundly

What impeachment votes?

[Cinnabar]

So, at first, you didn't think the Democrats would win the House last year.

THEN, you said they wouldn't launch an impeach inquiry, even though they did.

THEN, you said they wouldn't hold any vote on impeachment, which they just did today.

NOW, you're saying they won't even attempt a vote "that matters"...so when they do, I expect you to move the bar again.

How many times are you going to keep pushing the goalposts until you just admit you got conned?

until they follow Drumpf off a cliff