Members banned from this thread: Cypress, evince, domer76, Nomad and Jade Dragon


Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Obama’s Tarnished Legacy in the Middle East

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default Obama’s Tarnished Legacy in the Middle East

    Obama has the deaths of hundreds of thousands on his hands, why are you all so stupid? You'd do well to shut your yap and read this extremely well written piece in the Cairo Review.

    On Obama’s watch Al-Qaeda went into decline. A much-trumpeted act of this administration was the killing of Osama Bin Laden by a Navy Seal team in 2011. But Obama’s eagerness to withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq, and his indecisiveness about how to handle the crisis in Syria, led to the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS)—the latest and most vicious of apocalyptic terror movements in modern times.

    What makes Obama’s failure more salient, as he struggles in his final year in office to shape his legacy in the Middle East, is the catastrophe in Syria. The civil war has led to the disintegration and radicalization of the country, the destruction of Syrian society, and contributed to the biggest refugee crisis since the Second World War. All of this was brought on in no small part by Obama’s indecisiveness, tepid actions, and about-turns.

    Historians in the future may differ in their assessments of the extent of Obama’s culpability in the region’s calamities, but he will not escape the harsh judgment that his actions and inactions contributed significantly to the great unraveling of the Middle East.
    https://www.thecairoreview.com/essay...e-middle-east/

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,055
    Thanks
    2,436
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 6,202 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 493 Times in 469 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquillus in Exile View Post
    Is the article suggesting that Obama should have poured US troops into Syria? I thought that was BAD!
    And I thought that was GOOD.
    Every life matters

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    You can deny it as much as you like and bang on about SOFA and Bush, however it's undeniably true that Obama screwed up and you're all in denial about it.

    Sorry, Democrats: Obama Is More Responsible For ISIS Than Trump

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasd.../#7b4d5e26ff99

  4. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    What makes Obama’s failure more salient, as he struggles in his final year in office to shape his legacy in the Middle East, is the catastrophe in Syria. The civil war has led to the disintegration and radicalization of the country, the destruction of Syrian society, and contributed to the biggest refugee crisis since the Second World War.
    All of this was brought on in no small part by Obama’s indecisiveness, tepid actions, and about-turns.
    Obama certainly bungled his "arming Syrian rebels" (most of the weapons made their way to al-Nusra and the jihadi).
    And no doubt Obama completely froze up when it came to (not) strafing ISIS convoys in Iraq.
    And of course he & Hillary own Libya and it's terrible aftermath still today.

    But i wouldn't say he has much else to do with Syria Civil war.

  5. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    Obama certainly bungled his "arming Syrian rebels" (most of the weapons made their way to al-Nusra and the jihadi).
    And no doubt Obama completely froze up when it came to (not) strafing ISIS convoys in Iraq.
    And of course he & Hillary own Libya and it's terrible aftermath still today.

    But i wouldn't say he has much else to do with Syria Civil war.
    He should have left a rapid reaction force behind, but was more concerned with keeping his base happy.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to cancel2 2022 For This Post:

    dukkha (10-30-2019)

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    45,112
    Thanks
    9,815
    Thanked 7,426 Times in 5,873 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 6,484 Times in 6,228 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Bush left billions of dollars in cash in Iraq. The thinking was, possibly, that all factions would arm themselves with it and wipe each other out.
    Or maybe it was plain stupidity.



    Whoever- they were ALL in Iraq for ' Izrael's security '. Dumbasses.
    " First they came for the journalists...
    We don't know what happened after that . "

    Maria Ressa.

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    He should have left a rapid reaction force behind, but was more concerned with keeping his base happy.
    True. the story is al_Sadr was threatening to hold any Americans left under Iraqi law.
    And Obama used that reasoning to completely pull out.

    Obama could have tried to leave a reaction force,but I doubt he ever wanted to do so.

    I persoanlly don't care, since the Iraqi army was so bad, even U.S. residuals could not have kept it together
    when it faced ISIS

    But the lack of strafing and the "JV" remarks were inexcusable

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    Obama has the deaths of hundreds of thousands on his hands, why are you all so stupid? You'd do well to shut your yap and read this extremely well written piece in the Cairo Review.



    https://www.thecairoreview.com/essay...e-middle-east/
    This needs bumping, that's means you Mott!

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to cancel2 2022 For This Post:

    Earl (01-20-2020)

  11. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Havana Moon View Post
    This needs bumping, that's means you Mott!
    Bump!

  12. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    15,536
    Thanks
    1,378
    Thanked 3,981 Times in 3,024 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 841 Times in 781 Posts

    Default

    Can you imagine a Bernie Sanders presidency though? The US would go from the side of Israel to openly supporting Hamas in one day.
    is on twitter @realtsuke

    https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to tsuke For This Post:

    dukkha (01-20-2020), Earl (01-20-2020)

  14. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tsuke View Post
    Can you imagine a Bernie Sanders presidency though? The US would go from the side of Israel to openly supporting Hamas in one day.
    I think that realpolitik would hit him soon enough but yeh he'd be a walking disaster for a good year or more. The world has very little time for a naive fool like him, so he'd have to change to remain in power.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to cancel2 2022 For This Post:

    dukkha (01-20-2020)

  16. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    43,479
    Thanks
    12,574
    Thanked 23,756 Times in 16,563 Posts
    Groans
    249
    Groaned 1,622 Times in 1,532 Posts

    Default

    Sanders always said he would "lead a coalition" on foreign affairs -like that's going to just magically happen (not) without US leadership

  17. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    108,120
    Thanks
    60,501
    Thanked 35,051 Times in 26,519 Posts
    Groans
    47,393
    Groaned 4,742 Times in 4,521 Posts
    Blog Entries
    61

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    Sanders always said he would "lead a coalition" on foreign affairs -like that's going to just magically happen (not) without US leadership
    Sounds very much like the bullshit Corbyn used to spout, two peas in a pod!

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cancel2 2022 For This Post:

    dukkha (01-20-2020), Earl (01-20-2020)

Similar Threads

  1. The New Middle East
    By tsuke in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-07-2017, 01:00 PM
  2. Should the US get out of the Middle East?
    By Legion Troll in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 04-07-2016, 01:48 PM
  3. The Middle East
    By Disillusioned in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 09-10-2012, 09:11 AM
  4. U.S. in the Middle East
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 05-17-2007, 02:27 PM
  5. How The (Middle) East Was Won.
    By AnyOldIron in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-10-2006, 04:16 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •