Rep. Katie Hill Smashed The Glass Ceiling

[Flanders]

Talking about sexual antics of Democrats without a little perversion to spice up the topic would put a Satyr to sleep:

https://static.politico.com/88/97/fd...ll-gty-773.jpg

(POLITICO) -- Freshman Rep. Katie Hill is resigning from Congress after facing allegations of inappropriate sexual relationships with staffers in her office and on her congressional campaign, according to two Democratic sources.

“It is with a broken heart that today I announce my resignation from Congress. This is the hardest thing I have ever had to do, but I believe it is the best thing for my constituents, my community and our country,” Hill wrote in a letter announcing the news after it was first reported by POLITICO.

Note that Hill took a page from Hillary Clinton’s play book ——— Blame everybody except me.

“This is what needs to happen so that the good people who supported me will no longer be subjected to the pain inflicted by my abusive husband and the brutality of hateful political operatives who seem to happily provide a platform to a monster who is driving a smear campaign built around cyber exploitation,” she added.

Sex scandal explodes: Democrat quits Congress after nude photos revealed
Katie Hill was rising star in party, member of Speaker Nancy Pelosi's leadership team
Published October 27, 2019 at 7:56pm

https://www.wnd.com/2019/10/sex-scan...otos-revealed/

I always thought it was illogical to assume there were no degenerate females in Congress simply because none were ever outed. Rep. Katie Hill smashed the glass ceiling for all-time. Deviant females are no longer protected by a little boy’s fantasy ‘Mom is a saint in the bedroom.’ Basically, any institution that claims moral superiority by force naturally attracts the most depraved individuals.

Secretary Janet Napolitano was not a member of Congress, but she and her gal pals gave this country the first female sex scandal of a sort. A scandal that exposed depraved females in the upper echelons of government. After Napolitano put a crack in the dam it did not take long for the ladies in Congress like Katie Hill to get a taste of the equal treatment they would happily forego.

This week, the names of two of Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano's gal pals surfaced in a mortifying, Animal House-style scandal. If the allegations of whistleblowers pan out, DHS may soon be known as DSH: The Department of Sexual Harassment.

The Liberal Sisterhood of the Plundering Hacks
Michelle Malkin
Aug 17, 2012

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...ks_115139.html

The most troubling aspect of depraved ladies in high places is that they are usually Hillary Clinton feminazis who would send American men to die fighting in foreign lands for women’s Rights and gender equality. In fact, a female degenerate’s Right to govern includes the authority to send soldiers to die for the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). That is the governing Right Democrat women were after from day one.

Incidentally, I hope to hell Nappy did not pocket the dough the first time she got caught:

Patrick McGreevy of the Los Angeles Times reports:

The administration of the University of California system pays top workers salaries and benefits significantly higher than that of similar state employees, and failed to disclose to the Board of Regents and the public that it had $175 million in budget reserve funds while it was seeking to raise tuition, a state audit found Tuesday.

April 26, 2017
State audit slams Janet Napolitano’s office of University of California president
By Thomas Lifson

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/...president.html

On the bright side the lady rascal is leaving next year:

Napolitano made the announcement at the UC regents meeting at UCLA. She will step down Aug. 1, 2020.

UC President Janet Napolitano to step down
By Teresa Watanabe
Sep. 18, 2019 6:36 PM

https://www.latimes.com/california/s...litano-resigns

The UC will be ahead of the game if they hire Willie Sutton to do the audits after Napolitano leaves.

And lets not forget a paraphiliac in her right who fought the good fight to protect the privacy Rights of perverts everywhere.

In 1998 then-First Lady Hillary Clinton called for an Internet gatekeeper so she could put a lid on a White House sex scandal:

Clinton was asked whether she favored curbs on the Internet, after the DRUDGE REPORT made headlines with coverage of her husband's affair with a White House intern. "We are all going to have to rethink how we deal with this, because there are all these competing values ... Without any kind of editing function or gatekeeping function, what does it mean to have the right to defend your reputation?" she said.

FLASHBACK: HILLARY CLINTON SAYS INTERNET NEWS NEEDS 'RETHINK'
Drudge Report ^ | 9/25/05 | Matt Drudge

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1491134/posts

[Flanders]

The first person said to use the term Glass ceiling was Marilyn Loden during a 1978 speech. At the same time, according to the April 3, 2015, Wall Street Journal, completely independent of Loden, the term glass ceiling was coined in the spring of 1978 by Marianne Schriber and Katherine Lawrence at Hewlett-Packard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_ceiling#History

glass ceiling (noun)
plural: glass ceilings

an unofficially acknowledged barrier to advancement in a profession, especially affecting women and members of minorities.

The year 1978 gets credit for the accepted political definition of glass ceiling, but the term itself was used in 1940. Move the cursor to 1:38:02 and hear Hynkel use the term because he wanted to look up the dresses of the ladies dancing in the ballroom above:

[Flanders]

I always thought it was illogical to assume there were no degenerate females in Congress simply because none were ever outed. Rep. Katie Hill smashed the glass ceiling for all-time. Deviant females are no longer protected by a little boy’s fantasy ‘Mom is a saint in the bedroom.’ Basically, any institution that claims moral superiority by force naturally attracts the most depraved individuals.

Add “powerful women” to the Democrat Party’s long list of doublespeak. Katie Hill’s “powerful women” is doublespeak for ‘A woman’s power comes from her vagina’:
VIDEO ▼

https://video.foxnews.com/v/60998848...#sp=show-clips

According to Hill the most promiscuous women are the most powerful —— infinitely more entitled to govern than decent women. Worse still, the biggest whores are the most powerful women in Hill’s world.

Alas, women with loose hips have more dicks stuck in them than a porcupine has quills. No matter which way a man turns he is going to impale himself on a quill when he hops in bed with a trollop.

[Flanders]

It’s truly not shocking that a political leader would be a reprobate behind closed doors. From Caligula to the Marquis de Sade to Bill Clinton, the depraved have always been overrepresented among the ruling classes. It is for this reason that what’s even more distressing about the Katie Hill affair than what she did is the reaction to it from the broader society — including “broadminded conservatives” defending her.

Katie Hill is not:

Hill, the former Democrat congresswoman whose resignation from office took effect Nov. 1, certainly is our time’s Thoroughly Modern Millie. Her escapades have acquainted us with a new term, “throuple,” and she exhibited the cherished “diversity” in illicit affairs of having relations with both a man and a woman, each of whom held different underling positions. To top it off she was seen in intimate photos with a bong and the now obligatory tramp stamp (oh, yeah, sorry — “body art”).

She’s also fashionable in her lack of appropriate shame and in her externalizing; à la Monica Lewinsky, she’s blaming everyone for her scandal but herself. It’s “right-wing media,” her vindictive husband, a “misogynistic culture,” political operatives (is there Russian collusion, too?), and she has plenty of defenders.

Hill is dead wrong about men. Countless government horndogs lost their careers for everything from copping a feel to pressuring subordinate females to play hide the salami. On the bright side Hill is the first female degenerate to be driven out of office.

Hill has said that none of this would be happening were she a man; commentator-cum-comedian Bill Maher chimed in and, in addition, claimed that Republicans never resign in these situations.

What a testimonial to fascist leader Benito Mussolini’s statement about how he learned, when as a journalist (surprised this was his former career? LOL), that you could tell one lie one week and another two weeks later with impunity because people have short memories.

Does the name Mark Foley ring a bell? He was the GOP congressman from Florida who resigned in 2006 for transgressions similar to Hill’s; he sent inappropriate messages to male pages and allegedly had sexual contact with of-age former pages.

Then there’s Eric Massa, the Democrat congressman from upstate NY accused in 2010 of sexually harassing and groping two male staffers (he claimed they were tickle fights), who also resigned. Both he and Foley were men. I believe they still are. Moreover, a House rule Hill violated “was enacted last year in response to nearly a dozen male members of Congress resigning amid sexual harassment allegations” (emphasis added), reports The San Diego Union-Tribune.

There is only one thing I do not know about Hill: Is she she a good lay? She better be. The clock is ticking and she is not physically attractive. Once the bloom is completely off the rose Hill is destined to end up another bitter, ugly, old hag like Nancy Pelosi. Worse still for Hill, brutish homeless men are the only men that will have sex with repulsive elderly degenerate females.

Oh, as for Massa, Nancy Pelosi at the time called him “a very sick person” and “poor baby,” the latter sarcastically. And Katie Hill today? Pelosi says the lesson is to “be careful when transmitting photos” (be decadent, but don’t get caught).

So the truth is precisely the opposite of Hill’s claim: Were she a man, no one would even entertain her pathetic whining. In fact, she’d be called a cheatin’ dog.

But, hey, 2006 and 2010 and last year were even longer ago than two weeks back, and today’s Left is disappointed that Pelosi didn’t give Hill a “You go, girl!” The New York Times was a bit more circumspect, calling her case “complicated” and bringing to mind the apocryphal saying, “Moral issues are always complex matters — for people who have no principles.”

So I’ll enlighten the Times with the timeless. Hill claims she’s a victim of a “double standard,” but it’s her own standard. The aforementioned House rule is a #MeToo-inspired prohibition enacted late last year forbidding members from dating staffers — and Hill voted for it! She also didn’t mind piling on then-SCOTUS nominee Brett Kavanaugh with vicious virtue-signaling. It’s poetic that she’s been hoisted with her own petards.

What may be true is that Hill’s husband sought revenge. But so what? His possible bad motives don’t negate her bad behavior. Besides, how many political scandals aren’t exposed by people with ill intent? Did Kavanaugh’s accuser, Christine Blasey Ford, have only the purest motives? People party to scandals generally aren’t beatification-ready and are often driven by a desire for personal gain or vengeance.

But what truly bodes ill for our civilization, reflecting a virtue/vice tipping point, is the increasingly common belief that there was nothing at all wrong with Hill’s actions. CNN commentator Aisha Moodie-Mills perfectly epitomized this sexual devolutionary moral relativism/nihilism, saying last Monday of Hill that there “was nothing necessarily improper about this woman living her best life” (sheesh, I’d hate to see her worst one).

Note that she didn’t say “the” or even “a” best life, which could connote an objective standard; she stated “her best life,” implying it’s all relative, a matter of taste, like eating chocolate ice cream. (Of course, the term “best” then is inappropriate. For who is to say one “taste” is better than another?)

Bespeaking more still of the tipping point, though, sadly, is that even “conservatives” now are conserving this degraded attitude. Just consider Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.), a generally very sane and apparently honorable man. Calling the ethics investigation into Hill “absurd,” he claimed she was targeted only for being “different.” Well, I suppose we’re all different. Foley and Massa and the Marquis de Sade were certainly different. But when those differences amount to violating both divine and worldly laws, the differences are damnable.

Gaetz tweeted Oct. 24 that the “only person who seems to have a gripe is @RepKatieHill’s soon-to-be ex,” again reflecting relativism. It’s only her ex’s “feelings” that matter — and only to him — you see, because we know feelings are real (subjective truths, anyway) while right and wrong is just a “social construct.”

Gaetz also said that the issue was “generational” (so is civilizational collapse), with other Millennials sympathizing with Hill. “Who among us would look perfect if every ex leaked every photo/text?” his tweet also read. This couldn’t be more distant from the point.

There’s a lot of real estate between “perfect” and patently immoral, “perfect” and objectively unethical, “perfect” and hypocritical. Moreover, were perfection a prerequisite for upholding moral standards, we flawed humans couldn’t have any moral standards, not against lying, lewdness, rudeness, “racism” or anything else. I don’t know if you attended Sunday school, Mr. Gaetz, but we’re supposed to love the sinner but still hate the sin.

Gaetz is correct in saying that Millennials (and many others) won’t take issue with Hill’s photos because compromising pictures from their past are often floating about. But here’s a little Philosophy 101: Right and wrong aren’t determined by what people, even great masses of them, have done and want to justify. Right doesn’t become wrong because wrong becomes a rite.

Man has always sinned. But civilization is maintained by repenting and changing our ways — or, at worst, sinning privately — and professing morality publically. As for dumbing down standards and leading others toward Perdition just to self-centeredly salve our feelings, this is likely a far greater sin than whatever it is we aim to justify.

But the above errors were predicted. The great G.K. Chesterton wrote in 1926 that the “next great heresy is going to be simply an attack on morality; and especially on sexual morality.” Hence our Sexual Devolution.

Chesterton also observed that the “business of Progressives is to go on making mistakes. The business of Conservatives is to prevent mistakes from being corrected.”

“Even when the revolutionist might himself repent of his revolution, the traditionalist is already defending it as part of his tradition,” he continued. “Thus we have two great types — the advanced person who rushes us into ruin, and the retrospective person who admires the ruins.”

Face it, Katie Hill is simply very, very wrong, objectively and unchangeably. So are those who, awash in what used to be leftists’ central ism, relativism, busy themselves conserving yesterday’s liberals’ mistakes.

November 4, 2019
Katie Hill Affair and its Aftermath are Signs of America’s Decline
By Selwyn Duke

https://www.americanthinker.com/arti...s_decline.html

[Chuck]

Why did she resign? I thought Democrats loved deviants and think they're 'Diverse N Stuff'.

Oh ... I get it now ... she liked legal aged of consent women.

[Flanders]

Napolitano made the announcement at the UC regents meeting at UCLA. She will step down Aug. 1, 2020.

UC President Janet Napolitano to step down
By Teresa Watanabe
Sep. 18, 2019 6:36 PM

https://www.latimes.com/california/s...litano-resigns

The UC will be ahead of the game if they hire Willie Sutton to do the audits after Napolitano leaves.

Now if only Nappy’s judge will step down:

https://ucsdguardian.org/wp-content/...llo-Nov-20.jpg

Maricopa Madness: New Judge on Case Was Appointed by Former Democrat Governor Janet Napolitano – Sets Hearing in the Case for Tomorrow
By Joe Hoft
Published April 26, 2021 at 2:20pm

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...ke-place-case/