Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 64

Thread: Is this the explosive Hillary report you’ve been waiting for?

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,960
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    No.
    Hasn't been the fat Guy's record so far, you really didn't think Trump put him there to be a real Attorney General did you

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    evince (10-19-2019)

  3. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    The link is useless unless you subscribe to the totally biased WAPO.

    The Barr and IG investigations are coming.
    Tik tok.

  4. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    52,291
    Thanks
    77,752
    Thanked 23,568 Times in 17,849 Posts
    Groans
    38,677
    Groaned 3,238 Times in 3,042 Posts
    Blog Entries
    8

    Default

    John Henry Durham, the United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut!

  5. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    They don't care, that was pre election, they've moved on to thier "deep state" conspiracies
    yeap


    the new republican defense of Trump

    ITS THOSE EVIL AMERICANS WHO RUN OUR GOVERNMENT

  6. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    6,560
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 2,936 Times in 2,054 Posts
    Groans
    852
    Groaned 948 Times in 862 Posts

    Default

    It is just another distraction that works like a charm on the rightys. Forget Trump, the man in office and with real power who breaks laws for sport, and let's talk about a retired politician with no power who just writes books. A conspiracy a day keeps the police away.
    Hillary's emails have been investigated to death. There is nothing there. The Repubs arrived at that conclusion. However, there are still crazy rightys who have underserved power who will investigate who they are told to.

  7. The Following User Groans At Gonzomin For This Awful Post:

    Earl (10-19-2019)

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Gonzomin For This Post:

    evince (10-19-2019)

  9. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    134,846
    Thanks
    13,245
    Thanked 40,785 Times in 32,151 Posts
    Groans
    3,661
    Groaned 2,865 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    In other words, till the fat guy can frame or twist it till it supports what his master wants it to say
    are you talking about you and Hilliary?......just asking......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PostmodernProphet For This Post:

    Earl (10-19-2019), Stretch (10-19-2019)

  11. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    This report says the same thing Comey said huh guys


    why did Trump fire Comey for getting it correct?


    Oh yeah he wanted to stop the Russian investigation



    gee that didn't work huh

  12. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (10-19-2019)

  13. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    24,892
    Thanks
    4,196
    Thanked 15,334 Times in 9,321 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,825 Times in 2,563 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    poor teahicks, reduced to rehashing long-dead Hillary issues

    what's next, more Benghazi hearings?

    pathetic

  14. The Following User Groans At reagansghost For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (10-19-2019)

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to reagansghost For This Post:

    evince (10-19-2019)

  16. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  17. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (10-19-2019)

  18. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,533
    Thanks
    65,160
    Thanked 38,093 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    I cant read it
    Here's the first part.

    "A multiyear State Department probe of emails that were sent to former secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s private computer server concluded there was no systemic or deliberate mishandling of classified information by department employees, according to a report submitted to Congress this month. The report appears to represent a final and anticlimactic chapter in a controversy that overshadowed the 2016 presidential campaign and exposed Clinton to fierce criticism that she later cited as a major factor in her loss to President Trump.

    In the end, State Department investigators found 38 current or former employees “culpable” of violating security procedures — none involving material that had been marked classified — in a review of roughly 33,000 emails that had been sent to or from the personal computer system Clinton used.

    Overall, investigators said, “there was no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information.” The report cited “instances of classified information being inappropriately” transmitted, but noted that the vast majority of those scrutinized “were aware of security policies and did their best to implement them.”

    The release comes as Trump continues to raise the Clinton email issue to attack Democrats, even as new evidence has emerged of apparent security lapses by senior officials in his own administration. Diplomats involved in pressuring Ukraine to pursue investigations that would politically benefit Trump used private phones and texting apps to trade messages about their efforts, according to records released by leaders of the House impeachment inquiry.

    Dozens of former State employees were brought back in for questioning in recent months after being notified that emails they had sent years ago had been retroactively classified. The renewed activity after a long stretch in which the investigation had seemed to go dormant sparked suspicion that the Trump administration was seeking to revive an issue that had been politically advantageous to Republicans.

    One former official who was questioned described it as “a way to tarnish a whole bunch of Democratic foreign policy people.”

    State Department officials denied any political agenda, saying the interviews were part of the final stages of an internal inquiry that the department was under pressure to complete this month. Among those applying pressure was Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), who had sent letters to the State Department’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security seeking updates.

    The State Department probe focused on internal communications that were up to nine years old.


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to christiefan915 For This Post:

    Cypress (10-19-2019), evince (10-19-2019)

  20. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Steeler Nation
    Posts
    64,533
    Thanks
    65,160
    Thanked 38,093 Times in 25,664 Posts
    Groans
    5,815
    Groaned 2,614 Times in 2,498 Posts

    Default

    The rest of the article:

    Dozens of former State employees were brought back in for questioning in recent months after being notified that emails they had sent years ago had been retroactively classified.

    The renewed activity after a long stretch in which the investigation had seemed to go dormant sparked suspicion that the Trump administration was seeking to revive an issue that had been politically advantageous to Republicans. One former official who was questioned described it as “a way to tarnish a whole bunch of Democratic foreign policy people.”

    State Department officials denied any political agenda, saying the interviews were part of the final stages of an internal inquiry that the department was under pressure to complete this month. Among those applying pressure was Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), who had sent letters to the State Department’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security seeking updates. There is no indication that any of those scrutinized will be sanctioned, but many received letters saying they were judged to have been involved in “valid” security incidents even if “not culpable” of a formal breach — an ambiguous status that some fear could complicate their abilities to return to government service.

    The report does not identify those who were scrutinized, but the list included ambassadors and assistant secretaries of state responsible for U.S. policy in the Middle East, Europe and Central Asia.

    Few had sent emails directly to Clinton, and instead had routed them to William Burns, who served as deputy secretary of state, or Jake Sullivan, the former director of policy planning. They then relayed many of the messages to Clinton’s private email, a system she said she used mainly out of convenience. Clinton’s use of a private server, discovered by House Republicans as part of the probe of the deaths of U.S. diplomats and intelligence personnel in Benghazi, Libya, triggered overlapping investigations by Congress, the State Department and the FBI.

    Then-FBI Director James B. Comey’s handling of the matter enraged Democrats. In July 2016, Comey took the extraordinary step of announcing there would be no charges filed against Clinton in the email probe, but accused her of being “extremely careless” in a news conference. The bureau reopened the investigation in the final days of the 2016 race after discovering a laptop with Clinton emails as part of a separate case. Most were duplicates, and, again, there were no charges, but Comey’s decision to notify Congress revived the issue at a moment that Clinton has said was devastating to her campaign.

    The State Department suspended its internal review while the FBI probe was active, before resuming work in 2017. In total, the report found 91 violations by 38 individuals, and another 497 violations “where no individual was found to bear culpability.”

    The review did not encompass a separate collection of emails that Clinton’s lawyers withheld from the State Department and that she later destroyed, saying they were private and did not pertain to government business — a determination that was not verified by State Department officials."

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...4aa_story.html


    “What greater gift than the love of a cat.”
    ― Charles Dickens

  21. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by christiefan915 View Post
    Here's the first part.

    "A multiyear State Department probe of emails that were sent to former secretary of state Hillary Clinton’s private computer server concluded there was no systemic or deliberate mishandling of classified information by department employees, according to a report submitted to Congress this month. The report appears to represent a final and anticlimactic chapter in a controversy that overshadowed the 2016 presidential campaign and exposed Clinton to fierce criticism that she later cited as a major factor in her loss to President Trump.

    In the end, State Department investigators found 38 current or former employees “culpable” of violating security procedures — none involving material that had been marked classified — in a review of roughly 33,000 emails that had been sent to or from the personal computer system Clinton used.

    Overall, investigators said, “there was no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information.” The report cited “instances of classified information being inappropriately” transmitted, but noted that the vast majority of those scrutinized “were aware of security policies and did their best to implement them.”

    The release comes as Trump continues to raise the Clinton email issue to attack Democrats, even as new evidence has emerged of apparent security lapses by senior officials in his own administration. Diplomats involved in pressuring Ukraine to pursue investigations that would politically benefit Trump used private phones and texting apps to trade messages about their efforts, according to records released by leaders of the House impeachment inquiry.

    Dozens of former State employees were brought back in for questioning in recent months after being notified that emails they had sent years ago had been retroactively classified. The renewed activity after a long stretch in which the investigation had seemed to go dormant sparked suspicion that the Trump administration was seeking to revive an issue that had been politically advantageous to Republicans.

    One former official who was questioned described it as “a way to tarnish a whole bunch of Democratic foreign policy people.”

    State Department officials denied any political agenda, saying the interviews were part of the final stages of an internal inquiry that the department was under pressure to complete this month. Among those applying pressure was Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), who had sent letters to the State Department’s Bureau of Diplomatic Security seeking updates.

    The State Department probe focused on internal communications that were up to nine years old.
    good


    thanks

  22. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  23. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    cancel2 2022 (10-19-2019)

  24. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,389
    Thanks
    101,920
    Thanked 54,765 Times in 33,630 Posts
    Groans
    3,155
    Groaned 5,065 Times in 4,683 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    They don't care, that was pre election, they've moved on to thier "deep state" conspiracies
    I am sure the FISA report will find much of the same, if you recall, they found Steele credible. They will find abuses, but nothing Earth shattering as they continue to hope. Meanwhile, the investigation into Trump once again, turns up a tangled web of “Guaranteed Fraud”

  25. The Following User Groans At Phantasmal For This Awful Post:

    Earl (10-19-2019)

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    Cypress (10-19-2019)

  27. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2019
    Posts
    638
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 224 Times in 180 Posts
    Groans
    1
    Groaned 31 Times in 29 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Earl View Post
    The link is useless unless you subscribe to the totally biased WAPO.

    The Barr and IG investigations are coming.
    WAPO owned by Bezo's is rag.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-16-2019, 10:54 AM
  2. Replies: 101
    Last Post: 11-07-2018, 12:38 PM
  3. Replies: 54
    Last Post: 04-13-2018, 06:43 PM
  4. Report: Pimples Papadopoulos was a Hillary plant
    By Русский агент in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-01-2017, 08:51 PM
  5. Latest report on Hillary's prospects
    By Little-Acorn in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-24-2008, 11:46 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •