Pres.Trump crushed ISIS Caliphate;Does Not Want US in Middle of Syrian Civil War And?

[Grokmaster]

So you are being a complete and utter moron on purpose I got you

Still CAN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION, HUH, DICK BREATH ?

[Gonzomin]

More AD HOM BULLSHIT..ANSWER THE QUESTION:

.WHY THE FUCK DO YOU WANT THE US IN THE MIDDLE OF SYRIA's CIVIL WAR??????




De Oppresso Liber

Civil war? Tell that to ISIS, Russia and Iran.

[dukkha]

I don't think our Founders envisioned using our military might to provide some kind of counterweight in a conflict between Turks and Kurds, or ISIS and Al-Quada and Syria, or whatever the heck we are supposed to be doing.

[archives]

If you cannot see the WISDOM in that, you aren't very familiar with the ORIGINS of ISIS, OBAMA's "JV", and the COMPLETELY SEPARATE, Syrian Civil War.

The Kurds did not RUSH TO SAVE US FROM ISIS...the OPPOSITE is what happened, and THAT JOB IS DONE.

Why should we allow ourselves to become further embroiled in OBAMA'S QUAGMIRE, in SYRIA ???

Wrong, what a surprise, if anything, the Kurds, who Trump just f*cked cause he got punked by a autocrat, crushed ISIS with America's assistance

[archives]

I don't think our Founders envisioned using our military might to provide some kind of counterweight in a conflict between Turks and Kurds, or ISIS and Al-Quada and Syria, or whatever the heck we are supposed to be doing.

Come on "dukkha," our Founders never envisioned the country they started butchering each other in a Civil War, nor having a Chief Executive who refuses to accept the equal authority of another branch of Gov't

And what we are suppose to do is that which best serves the interests of the United States, and not just our interests today, but also how today's event effect our interests in the future

[dukkha]

Come on "dukkha," our Founders never envisioned the country they started butchering each other in a Civil War, nor having a Chief Executive who refuses to accept the equal authority of another branch of Gov't

And what we are suppose to do is that which best serves the interests of the United States, and not just our interests today, but also how today's event effect our interests in the future

I was referring specifically to the "entangling alliances" warned by Washington.

Even NATO -with it's endless expansion has become problematic, as we are funding a war between
Russia and the Ukraine.
Did you know we now patrol the Black Sea?? why are we putting ourselves in the middle of conflicts
where it's not in our interest to do so? Like Syria/Iraq/Libya and NATO expansion (cold War 2.0)?

[archives]

I was referring specifically to the "entangling alliances" warned by Washington.

Even NATO -with it's endless expansion has become problematic, as we are funding a war between
Russia and the Ukraine.
Did you know we now patrol the Black Sea?? why are we putting ourselves in the middle of conflicts
where it's not in our interest to do so? Like Syria/Iraq/Libya and NATO expansion (cold War 2.0)?

Washington had two oceans protecting the US, and, if you want to go there, Washington and many of the other Founders warned about inviting foreign influence in our elections

US involvement in world affairs is self serving, we attempt to control events that benefit us the most, it isn't all altruistic, we are involved in NATO as a counterbalance to Russian influence, just as we are in south Asia to serve as a check on China. Either entity becoming dominate in those areas isn't good for the US

[dukkha]

Washington had two oceans protecting the US, and, if you want to go there, Washington and many of the other Founders warned about inviting foreign influence in our elections

US involvement in world affairs is self serving, we attempt to control events that benefit us the most, it isn't all altruistic, we are involved in NATO as a counterbalance to Russian influence, just as we are in south Asia to serve as a check on China. Either entity becoming dominate in those areas isn't good for the US

there is no self serving reasons for being in the middle of the Syrian civil war, the destruction of Libya
the fracturing of Iraq and the endless war in Afghanistan

why is Russia being a superpower in eastern Europe our problem?
Everyone is ok with NATO when it really was about the Atlantic Alliance -
but Romania, Slovakia and inexorably Ukraine? WTF.

and this nonsense about "Putin has eyes on the Baltics " is more neocon paranoia

[Grokmaster]

Civil war? Tell that to ISIS, Russia and Iran.

Right, STUPIDFUCK, who are all in the middle of Syria's Civil War...OBAMA'S CLUSTERFUCK.


Pres.Trump went to CRUSH THE CALIPHATE...HE DID.



ANSWER the QUESTION: WHY THE FUCK DO YOU WANT THE US IN THE MIDDLE OF SYRIA's CIVIL WAR??????

[Darth Omar]

Wrong, what a surprise, if anything, the Kurds, who Trump just f*cked cause he got punked by a autocrat, crushed ISIS with America's assistance

Which is the same as saying they couldn’t have done it without us.

ISIS is crushed, the task is completed. So that was the extent and the basis of our relationship with the Kurds. Time to move on and do something else.

Lost in all of this was Trump’s move to stop the CIA from arming ‘moderate’ anti-Assad rebels in April of 2017. I remember it well because I cheered it. It was an utterly bone headed operation started under Obama and done in an effort to topple Assad. Arms were distributed to the ‘moderate’ rebels and these ‘moderates’ too often turned out be the very terrorists us AND our buddies the Kurds were fighting.

And it wasn’t long after that, that ISIS was ‘crushed’ as you say.

Utterly bone headed CIA operations aside, what the hell are we doing in trying to topple Assad? I assume you lectured people about the outcome of toppling Saddam and the effects it would have in Iraq. Why do you suppose the outcome in Syria would any different? Keep in mind these bone heads started the operation AFTER both Libya and Iraq. ‘We must topple Assad!’

Are they incapable of learning lol? Isn’t doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome the definition of insanity? The ‘anti-war’ left—of all people, should have been crying foul after the Libya debacle yet here they are jumping and screaming about staying IN Syria when we have no business being there.

Forget about being ‘punked’ by Erdogan. How about let’s stopped getting ‘punked’ by people in our own State Department? How about we put a stop to the insanity?

[anatta]

Which is the same as saying they couldn’t have done it without us.

ISIS is crushed, the task is completed. So that was the extent and the basis of our relationship with the Kurds. Time to move on and do something else.

Lost in all of this was Trump’s move to stop the CIA from arming ‘moderate’ anti-Assad rebels in April of 2017. I remember it well because I cheered it. It was an utterly bone headed operation started under Obama and done in an effort to topple Assad. Arms were distributed to the ‘moderate’ rebels and these ‘moderates’ too often turned out be the very terrorists us AND our buddies the Kurds were fighting.

And it wasn’t long after that, that ISIS was ‘crushed’ as you say.

Utterly bone headed CIA operations aside, what the hell are we doing in trying to topple Assad? I assume you lectured people about the outcome of toppling Saddam and the effects it would have in Iraq. Why do you suppose the outcome in Syria would any different? Keep in mind these bone heads started the operation AFTER both Libya and Iraq. ‘We must topple Assad!’

Are they incapable of learning lol? Isn’t doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome the definition of insanity? The ‘anti-war’ left—of all people, should have been crying foul after the Libya debacle yet here they are jumping and screaming about staying IN Syria when we have no business being there.

Forget about being ‘punked’ by Erdogan. How about let’s stopped getting ‘punked’ by people in our own State Department? How about we put a stop to the insanity?

"arming da Rebels" I had for gotten that fiasco! Trump showed very good sense there.

Forget about being ‘punked’ by Erdogan. How about let’s stopped getting ‘punked’ by people in our own State Department? How about we put a stop to the insanity?

they are still at it.
The whole Clinton/Albright wing of "interventionism to protect" can't stop themselves

[katzgar]

Still CAN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION, HUH, DICK BREATH ?

So you are being a complete and utter moron on purpose I got you

[Grokmaster]

So you are being a complete and utter moron on purpose I got you

Still CAN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION, HUH, DICK BREATH ?


I'm sure no one noticed your UTTER FALIURE TO DO SO, just like the rest of the JPP LEFT DIMWITS...

[katzgar]

Still CAN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION, HUH, DICK BREATH ?


I'm sure no one noticed your UTTER FALIURE TO DO SO, just like the rest of the JPP LEFT DIMWITS...

you have no question you are just pulling snot out of your ass

[Grokmaster]

Wrong, what a surprise, if anything, the Kurds, who Trump just f*cked cause he got punked by a autocrat, crushed ISIS with America's assistance

HORSE SHIT; they were GETTING THEIR ASSES KICKED UNTIL WE ENTERRED THE FRAY. MAKEUP SOME MORE BULLSHIT....