Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 116

Thread: 96% of biologists...life begins at fertilization

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default 96% of biologists...life begins at fertilization

    https://quillette.com/2019/10/16/i-a...wasnt-popular/

    96%... CONSENUS!

    Bottom line, the abortion debate should not be about whether or not a fertilized egg is human. It should be about the legal issue of when the unborn human child should be granted basic human life protections. Is it from day 1? After the heartbeat is detected? Sentience? Birth?

    As seen in the article above, even the biologists who knew the correct answer scientifically still had urges to demean the question as they thought it would hurt their position on abortion.

    Quit denying science. Admit the progeny is human. Then get on with the legal debate.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Superfreak For This Post:

    Granule (10-17-2019), Stretch (10-16-2019), TOP (10-16-2019)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    https://quillette.com/2019/10/16/i-a...wasnt-popular/

    96%... CONSENUS!

    Bottom line, the abortion debate should not be about whether or not a fertilized egg is human. It should be about the legal issue of when the unborn human child should be granted basic human life protections. Is it from day 1? After the heartbeat is detected? Sentience? Birth?

    As seen in the article above, even the biologists who knew the correct answer scientifically still had urges to demean the question as they thought it would hurt their position on abortion.

    Quit denying science. Admit the progeny is human. Then get on with the legal debate.
    Nobody is denying a human embryo is a human embryo. Read Roe, they discuss all the important aspects in concluding upon a location to
    state when a "person" vested with rights such that the state has a compelling interest to regulate and protect against the countervailing right to
    privacy, which they acknowledged and protected also, and that included biological facts, historical treatment of the subject, religion in history
    and criminal law.

    I bet if righttard moron ACTUALLY BOTHERED TO READ ROE V WADE, they'd realize what a well thought out treatise it indeed is.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Micawber For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (10-16-2019)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Nobody is denying a human embryo is a human embryo. Read Roe, they discuss all the important aspects in concluding upon a location to
    state when a "person" vested with rights such that the state has a compelling interest to regulate and protect against the countervailing right to
    privacy, which they acknowledged and protected also, and that included biological facts, historical treatment of the subject, religion in history
    and criminal law.

    I bet if rightward moron ACTUALLY BOTHERED TO READ ROE V WADE, they'd realize what a well considered treatise it indeed is.
    So consensus and science don't matter when you disagree?

  6. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    STFU Complete fucking moron. You are a blob of cells that needs repeated stabbing.

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    9,164
    Thanks
    3,635
    Thanked 6,593 Times in 4,192 Posts
    Groans
    130
    Groaned 1,203 Times in 1,060 Posts

    Default

    Save The Fetus/Screw The Child

    The right wing mantra
    BLUEXIT
    A Modest Proposal For Separating Blue States From Red

    Dear Red-State Trump Voter,
    Let’s face it, guys: We’re done.


    It is a tragedy that so much of the work that so many men and women toiled at for so long to make this a better country, and a better world, has been thrown away, leaving us all in such needless peril.

    This is why our separation in all but name is necessary.


    https://newrepublic.com/article/1409...mp-red-america

  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    STFU Complete fucking moron. You are a blob of cells that needs repeated stabbing.
    I'll be waiting for you to get your knife and start. If you're man enough, step up and try.

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Micawber View Post
    Nobody is denying a human embryo is a human embryo. Read Roe, they discuss all the important aspects in concluding upon a location to
    state when a "person" vested with rights such that the state has a compelling interest to regulate and protect against the countervailing right to
    privacy, which they acknowledged and protected also, and that included biological facts, historical treatment of the subject, religion in history
    and criminal law.

    I bet if righttard moron ACTUALLY BOTHERED TO READ ROE V WADE, they'd realize what a well thought out treatise it indeed is.
    I understand Roe deals with the legality. I am talking about the idiots on the left that continually try to pretend the progeny isn't human. That it is not a unique human life.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Superfreak For This Post:

    TOP (10-16-2019)

  11. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    I understand Roe deals with the legality. I am talking about the idiots on the left that continually try to pretend the progeny isn't human. That it is not a unique human life.
    Most lefties will get around to trashing science about two pages into an abortion debate.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    Stretch (10-16-2019)

  13. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    28,403
    Thanks
    26,104
    Thanked 11,856 Times in 8,415 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,290 Times in 2,172 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CFM View Post
    I'll be waiting for you to get your knife and start. If you're man enough, step up and try.
    Watch out, black men are coming after you.

  14. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Posts
    57,638
    Thanks
    563
    Thanked 10,010 Times in 8,569 Posts
    Groans
    29
    Groaned 498 Times in 487 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trumpet View Post
    Watch out, black men are coming after you.
    I thought Micawber would be the one coming since he made the claim about what should happen.

  15. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,506
    Thanks
    2,892
    Thanked 9,834 Times in 6,110 Posts
    Groans
    422
    Groaned 710 Times in 658 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    This is beyond sad. Talk about bullshit sourcing with this monstrous fabrication. The owner is demented and sickening, so why you don't check these things is nuts. Can we please put on some big boy pants?

    https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/quillette/

    Look into the lady yourself if you need to elsewhere.
    Last edited by Jade Dragon; 10-16-2019 at 04:11 PM.

  16. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    land-locked in Ocala,FL
    Posts
    27,321
    Thanks
    30,862
    Thanked 16,758 Times in 11,557 Posts
    Groans
    1,063
    Groaned 889 Times in 847 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    https://quillette.com/2019/10/16/i-a...wasnt-popular/

    96%... CONSENUS!

    Bottom line, the abortion debate should not be about whether or not a fertilized egg is human. It should be about the legal issue of when the unborn human child should be granted basic human life protections. Is it from day 1? After the heartbeat is detected? Sentience? Birth?

    As seen in the article above, even the biologists who knew the correct answer scientifically still had urges to demean the question as they thought it would hurt their position on abortion.

    Quit denying science. Admit the progeny is human. Then get on with the legal debate.
    Thank-you.
    Abortion rights dogma can obscure human reason & harden the human heart so much that the same person who feels
    empathy for animal suffering can lack compassion for unborn children who experience lethal violence and excruciating
    pain in abortion.

    Unborn animals are protected in their nesting places, humans are not. To abort something is to end something
    which has begun. To abort life is to end it.



  17. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    56,500
    Thanks
    25,106
    Thanked 20,417 Times in 16,406 Posts
    Groans
    129
    Groaned 1,433 Times in 1,355 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    https://quillette.com/2019/10/16/i-a...wasnt-popular/

    96%... CONSENUS!

    Bottom line, the abortion debate should not be about whether or not a fertilized egg is human. It should be about the legal issue of when the unborn human child should be granted basic human life protections. Is it from day 1? After the heartbeat is detected? Sentience? Birth?

    As seen in the article above, even the biologists who knew the correct answer scientifically still had urges to demean the question as they thought it would hurt their position on abortion.

    Quit denying science. Admit the progeny is human. Then get on with the legal debate.
    I'm pretty sure that every single person posting here's life began when there was fertilization of an egg/sperm...unless someone wants to claim otherwise, of course....

  18. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    56,500
    Thanks
    25,106
    Thanked 20,417 Times in 16,406 Posts
    Groans
    129
    Groaned 1,433 Times in 1,355 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    https://quillette.com/2019/10/16/i-a...wasnt-popular/

    96%... CONSENUS!

    Bottom line, the abortion debate should not be about whether or not a fertilized egg is human. It should be about the legal issue of when the unborn human child should be granted basic human life protections. Is it from day 1? After the heartbeat is detected? Sentience? Birth?

    As seen in the article above, even the biologists who knew the correct answer scientifically still had urges to demean the question as they thought it would hurt their position on abortion.

    Quit denying science. Admit the progeny is human. Then get on with the legal debate.
    I'm pretty sure that every single person posting here had their life began when there was fertilization of an egg/sperm...unless someone wants to claim otherwise, of course....

  19. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    20,706
    Thanks
    1,054
    Thanked 5,654 Times in 4,435 Posts
    Groans
    295
    Groaned 184 Times in 180 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    https://quillette.com/2019/10/16/i-a...wasnt-popular/

    96%... CONSENUS!

    Bottom line, the abortion debate should not be about whether or not a fertilized egg is human. It should be about the legal issue of when the unborn human child should be granted basic human life protections. Is it from day 1? After the heartbeat is detected? Sentience? Birth?

    As seen in the article above, even the biologists who knew the correct answer scientifically still had urges to demean the question as they thought it would hurt their position on abortion.

    Quit denying science. Admit the progeny is human. Then get on with the legal debate.
    The abortion debate was based on when the fetus becomes viable. There was nothing in Roe v. Wade or other court decisions about "when life begins."

Similar Threads

  1. NASA: Carbon dioxide fertilization greening Earth, study finds
    By cancel2 2022 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 04-30-2016, 05:11 AM
  2. '100s of esteemed biologists' lied about evolution
    By Conservative in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 02-15-2012, 08:42 PM
  3. Replies: 19
    Last Post: 05-27-2011, 06:08 PM
  4. If Life Begins at Conception
    By Timshel in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 09-04-2008, 08:04 AM
  5. Biologists trying to save endangered species use the wrong fish
    By tinfoil in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-06-2007, 07:32 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •