I was wondering how the law was broken to justify this judgement. The article explains it. The denier claimed without basis that the parents of Sandy Hook victims falsified the death certificates. He has made a record of publicly claiming (falsely) that the Sandy Hook parents are 'liars,' a defamation of character. It is a false claim, so the parents were harmed and the defendant must then pay them an amount to compensate them for the harm he caused them.
Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.
Bookmarks