If anyone wants to know why Nancy Pelosi hasn't called a vote to impeach

[archives]

RQAA. What 'alternative version'?

Well, it depends where you pick it up in the chronology, first it was that there was nothing wrong, next we were told Trump was suddenly so concerned about corruption, from there it went to there was nothing wrong with asking foreign nations to help find dirt on political rivals, and when that got him more flack, they returned to the it was a good phone call. Today is is everything Pelosi does is illegal cause they haven't had a full House vote to start an impeachment inquiry, it is being done behind closed doors, and make sure you include Biden innuendos anytime you can

If the White House wasn't on edge, there wouldn't have been so many revisions, keep looking for the one that will stick, as I noted, Pelosi has them backpedaling

[Truth Detector]

Ah, if it was only that simple, those conclusions are based upon Mueller's legal definition of what collusion is, which he goes in length to explain is something that really can't be proven, you would know that if you read the report "that is on your computer."

Gets funnier, now "truthie" wants cut and paste, a specialty of his, it is the entire Fourth section of Part one of the report, "RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT LINKS TO AND CONTACTS WITH THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN," it documents over one hundred contacts between the Russians and Trump campaign, you want me to copy and paste all of the contacts, no need, especially since you got it "on your computer," it should be easy for you

And lastly, billy barr got out in front to frame the report, why else did he even have a press conference, why didn't he release the report to Congress beforehand, the White House had it for weeks, the media never saw it, nor did the American public. You'd have to be totally naive or plan dumb to deny billy barr knew what his role was and he fulfilled it successfully

You really are a clueless moron. The Party of the Jackass needs clueless dumb morons like you to vote for them.

Folks, this is why you cannot have a coherent debate with willful idiots who are dishonest hacks. It doesn't matter what the FACTS are; they will argue that their strawman claims outweigh the facts.

[Truth Detector]

Well, it depends where you pick it up in the chronology, first it was that there was nothing wrong, next we were told Trump was suddenly so concerned about corruption, from there it went to there was nothing wrong with asking foreign nations to help find dirt on political rivals, and when that got him more flack, they returned to the it was a good phone call. Today is is everything Pelosi does is illegal cause they haven't had a full House vote to start an impeachment inquiry, it is being done behind closed doors, and make sure you include Biden innuendos anytime you can

If the White House wasn't on edge, there wouldn't have been so many revisions, keep looking for the one that will stick, as I noted, Pelosi has them backpedaling

Trump never asked the Ukrainian President to find dirt on his political opponent. Copy and paste the transcript portion that supports this moronic lie.

[Into the Night]

Well, it depends where you pick it up in the chronology, first it was that there was nothing wrong, next we were told Trump was suddenly so concerned about corruption, from there it went to there was nothing wrong with asking foreign nations to help find dirt on political rivals, and when that got him more flack, they returned to the it was a good phone call.

No chronology. They are all true. You are imposing a sequence that isn't there.

Today is is everything Pelosi does is illegal

No, but a lot of what she does is.

cause they haven't had a full House vote to start an impeachment inquiry,

Which is required.

it is being done behind closed doors,

It is not being done. What is happening 'behind closed doors' is KGB-like persecution.

and make sure you include Biden innuendos anytime you can

Why?

If the White House wasn't on edge, there wouldn't have been so many revisions,

There is no sequence. What revisions?

[Into the Night]

Trump never asked the Ukrainian President to find dirt on his political opponent. Copy and paste the transcript portion that supports this moronic lie.

He never said Trump did (he just inferred it). He is trying to make the case the such behavior is an impeachable offense. It is not.

[PostmodernProphet]

You are really confused, if it is not in the Constitution she doesn't have to do it

I believe you meant to say, if its not in the Constitution, she doesn't have the authority to do it....case closed......

They could request such, but why would they, nothing is being litigated, it is an information gathering process

to gather information, you stupid fuck......

[PostmodernProphet]

Ah, if it was only that simple, those conclusions are based upon Mueller's legal definition of what collusion is, which he goes in length to explain is something that really can't be proven, you would know that if you read the report "that is on your computer."

Gets funnier, now "truthie" wants cut and paste, a specialty of his, it is the entire Fourth section of Part one of the report, "RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT LINKS TO AND CONTACTS WITH THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN," it documents over one hundred contacts between the Russians and Trump campaign, you want me to copy and paste all of the contacts, no need, especially since you got it "on your computer," it should be easy for you

And lastly, billy barr got out in front to frame the report, why else did he even have a press conference, why didn't he release the report to Congress beforehand, the White House had it for weeks, the media never saw it, nor did the American public. You'd have to be totally naive or plan dumb to deny billy barr knew what his role was and he fulfilled it successfully

Mueller says you're a fucking idiot........

[PostmodernProphet]

If it wasn't significant why then is Trump, the White House, all his surrogate and apologists, plus the entire right wing media doing their best to offer an "alternative" version?

because Schiff and the rest of the demmycunts are lying their asses off.......,

[archives]

Trump never asked the Ukrainian President to find dirt on his political opponent. Copy and paste the transcript portion that supports this moronic lie.

Been there, done that, we know, you think Trump really was concerned about corruption with his "favor" request, interesting, the only name mentioned was that of Biden, yet you want us to believe Trump, who didn't give a shit about Saudi Arabia butchering a journalist nor his "lover" massacring his populace is now concerned about corruption

Next

[archives]

No chronology. They are all true. You are imposing a sequence that isn't there.

No, but a lot of what she does is.

Which is required.

It is not being done. What is happening 'behind closed doors' is KGB-like persecution.

Why?

There is no sequence. What revisions?

Telling how some Trumpkins can't respond in complete thoughts, so, accordingly;

Not true, Trump went from A to B to C to who knows what

Prove it

Not true, not in Constitution, and plenty of precedent with previous impeachments of judges and state officials

Nope, GOP Committee are present to ask questions

Part of the script

Provided them

Next time try complete thoughts rather than dangling participles

[Into the Night]

Telling how some Trumpkins can't respond in complete thoughts, so, accordingly;

YALIF.

Not true, Trump went from A to B to C to who knows what

There is no sequence.

Prove it

Present activity. The one you are defending.

Not true, not in Constitution, and plenty of precedent with previous impeachments of judges and state officials

Precedence does not change the Constitution. Yes, it is in the Constitution. See Articles I, II, and III.

Nope, GOP Committee are present to ask questions

No, they aren't.

Part of the script
Provided them

Lie. No, you haven't.

Next time try complete thoughts rather than dangling participles

YALIF.

[Truth Detector]

Been there, done that, we know, you think Trump really was concerned about corruption with his "favor" request, interesting, the only name mentioned was that of Biden, yet you want us to believe Trump, who didn't give a shit about Saudi Arabia butchering a journalist nor his "lover" massacring his populace is now concerned about corruption

Next

I read the transcript. I have a brain. You bought Schiff's lie filled version; you can't think for yourself.

[StoneByStone]

Those are lies. Why do you continue to bloviate outright lies? We have the transcript. The transcript does not support the lies you are bloviating with.

Damn, my bad. I thought it did.

[Truth Detector]

Damn, my bad. I thought it did.

You don't think.