Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: Endless Wars, Open-Ended Commitments

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    39,147
    Thanks
    10,236
    Thanked 15,914 Times in 11,170 Posts
    Groans
    223
    Groaned 1,595 Times in 1,519 Posts

    Default Endless Wars, Open-Ended Commitments

    Flying from Baghdad to Erbil is like flying from the Moon to Miami. The differences are stunning indeed. Compared to Baghdad, Erbil (the provincial capital of Iraqi Kurdistan) is an oasis.
    Deplaning, we were greeted warmly. We were told we would no longer need to wear flack jackets.
    Erbil was modern and safe. If the rest of Iraq and Afghanistan look like the Kurdish region in 20 years, the American blood and treasure might have been worth it. The jury is still out on that.

    Candidate Trump promised to extract our armed forces from regional skirmishes in that region.
    It is one more promise he rightly intends to keep.
    The various tribes have been fighting with each other for 1,000 years.
    Additional American sacrifice may not change much. ISIS has been virtually destroyed.
    President Trump asks, are we to keep troops in Syria forever?

    The Turks are more than willing to fill the void.
    They can hold Assad in check and insure that the Islamic State doesn’t make a military comeback.
    They can also take the lead with displaced Syrian refugees. They will deal with the ISIS POW’s.
    More importantly, they represent an important counterbalance to Iranian ambitions.

    Legitimate concerns have been expressed that we are leaving our friends, the Kurds to the tender mercies of President Erdogan’s Turkish army. Erdogan is far from a trustworthy partner and certainly no friend of the Kurds. The Kurds are not completely sinless in the lingering dispute.
    Fear of a wholesale slaughter of Kurdish fighters is not unjustified.
    Abandoning trusted allies would send a chilling message to other allies in potential hotspots around the world.
    Critics claim that keeping a campaign promise would come at a heavy price.

    Undoubtably, President Trump has weighed all of these concerns before making his decision.
    He has threatened Erdogan, saying that moves against the Kurds will have disastrous consequences.
    Turkey desperately needs the United States and Western Europe for trade and capital.
    The Turks are still extremely sensitive whenever the issue of the Armenian genocide comes up.
    They want acceptance from the West. The Turks would be ostracized by the West for generations for anything resembling a repeat genocide of the Kurds.


    Some have said that we do not want a confrontation that could lead to a war with Turkey. That is true.
    It is also safe to say that the Turks cannot afford a confrontation, not just with us, but the rest of NATO as well.
    We must assume that President Trump received assurances that there would be no Kurdish genocide.
    Although evidence today suggests otherwise, Erdogan must know that Trump doesn’t bluff.
    It would be foolhardy for him to double cross this President.

    Europeans are clucking loudly about the President’s decision.
    Perhaps it is time for them (and NATO) to step up and take our place in Syria.
    If the primary mission has morphed into serving as a tripwire, stopping potential Turkish aggression,
    wouldn’t NATO troops be just as effective?

    https://townhall.com/columnists/gilg...ments-n2554635

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to anatta For This Post:

    Darth Omar (10-13-2019)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    35,749
    Thanks
    10,198
    Thanked 23,929 Times in 15,631 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 1,056 Times in 1,009 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    Flying from Baghdad to Erbil is like flying from the Moon to Miami. The differences are stunning indeed. Compared to Baghdad, Erbil (the provincial capital of Iraqi Kurdistan) is an oasis.
    Deplaning, we were greeted warmly. We were told we would no longer need to wear flack jackets.
    Erbil was modern and safe. If the rest of Iraq and Afghanistan look like the Kurdish region in 20 years, the American blood and treasure might have been worth it. The jury is still out on that.

    Candidate Trump promised to extract our armed forces from regional skirmishes in that region.
    It is one more promise he rightly intends to keep.
    The various tribes have been fighting with each other for 1,000 years.
    Additional American sacrifice may not change much. ISIS has been virtually destroyed.
    President Trump asks, are we to keep troops in Syria forever?

    The Turks are more than willing to fill the void.
    They can hold Assad in check and insure that the Islamic State doesn’t make a military comeback.
    They can also take the lead with displaced Syrian refugees. They will deal with the ISIS POW’s.
    More importantly, they represent an important counterbalance to Iranian ambitions.

    Legitimate concerns have been expressed that we are leaving our friends, the Kurds to the tender mercies of President Erdogan’s Turkish army. Erdogan is far from a trustworthy partner and certainly no friend of the Kurds. The Kurds are not completely sinless in the lingering dispute.
    Fear of a wholesale slaughter of Kurdish fighters is not unjustified.
    Abandoning trusted allies would send a chilling message to other allies in potential hotspots around the world.
    Critics claim that keeping a campaign promise would come at a heavy price.

    Undoubtably, President Trump has weighed all of these concerns before making his decision.
    He has threatened Erdogan, saying that moves against the Kurds will have disastrous consequences.
    Turkey desperately needs the United States and Western Europe for trade and capital.
    The Turks are still extremely sensitive whenever the issue of the Armenian genocide comes up.
    They want acceptance from the West. The Turks would be ostracized by the West for generations for anything resembling a repeat genocide of the Kurds.


    Some have said that we do not want a confrontation that could lead to a war with Turkey. That is true.
    It is also safe to say that the Turks cannot afford a confrontation, not just with us, but the rest of NATO as well.
    We must assume that President Trump received assurances that there would be no Kurdish genocide.
    Although evidence today suggests otherwise, Erdogan must know that Trump doesn’t bluff.
    It would be foolhardy for him to double cross this President.

    Europeans are clucking loudly about the President’s decision.
    Perhaps it is time for them (and NATO) to step up and take our place in Syria.
    If the primary mission has morphed into serving as a tripwire, stopping potential Turkish aggression,
    wouldn’t NATO troops be just as effective?

    https://townhall.com/columnists/gilg...ments-n2554635
    Boom.

    Why are WE always the ‘chosen ones’ [to borrow Trump’s theologically loaded phrase lol] to manage these things? It makes zero sense for our tax dollars going to NATO while NATO sits on its fricking thumbs while even more of our tax dollars goes to policing THEIR part of the world.

    Do you see NATO at our border helping to manage OUR immigration crisis? I literally made myself chuckle at the thought.

    Trump is a businessman so it’s easy to see why this sort of thing gets under his skin. All other politicians see our tax dollars as some sort inexhaustible fountain but Trump looks at it differently. One of the first things he did in foreign policy was to get NATO countries to pony-up.

    Now they can actually do something by taking over our ‘police duties’.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    17,770
    Thanks
    1,829
    Thanked 8,051 Times in 5,359 Posts
    Groans
    330
    Groaned 2,426 Times in 2,184 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Boom.

    Why are WE always the ‘chosen ones’ [to borrow Trump’s theologically loaded phrase lol] to manage these things? It makes zero sense for our tax dollars going to NATO while NATO sits on its fricking thumbs while even more of our tax dollars goes to policing THEIR part of the world.

    Do you see NATO at our border helping to manage OUR immigration crisis? I literally made myself chuckle at the thought.

    Trump is a businessman so it’s easy to see why this sort of thing gets under his skin. All other politicians see our tax dollars as some sort inexhaustible fountain but Trump looks at it differently. One of the first things he did in foreign policy was to get NATO countries to pony-up.

    Now they can actually do something by taking over our ‘police duties’.

    European fuckupedness is a great part of why we wield world power. European fuckupedness is literally why America and many other countries exist. NATO, the World Bank and yes even the EU are our creations. We created the new world order to eliminate European fucking up. The brits imploded post WW2 when their empire told them to fuck off. The world order is indeed our creation and our benefit.

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    35,749
    Thanks
    10,198
    Thanked 23,929 Times in 15,631 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 1,056 Times in 1,009 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by katzgar View Post
    European fuckupedness is a great part of why we wield world power. European fuckupedness is literally why America and many other countries exist. NATO, the World Bank and yes even the EU are our creations. We created the new world order to eliminate European fucking up. The brits imploded post WW2 when their empire told them to fuck off. The world order is indeed our creation and our benefit.
    I agree with some of that but I see little in the way of benefit, for us, in the current order.

    Which is the essence of America First. Probably a big reason Trump wouldn’t win a popularity contest amongst European leaders. They have a big stake in the status quo.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    9,949
    Thanks
    15,575
    Thanked 3,689 Times in 2,658 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 1,576 Times in 1,472 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    Flying from Baghdad to Erbil is like flying from the Moon to Miami. The differences are stunning indeed. Compared to Baghdad, Erbil (the provincial capital of Iraqi Kurdistan) is an oasis.
    Deplaning, we were greeted warmly. We were told we would no longer need to wear flack jackets.
    Erbil was modern and safe. If the rest of Iraq and Afghanistan look like the Kurdish region in 20 years, the American blood and treasure might have been worth it. The jury is still out on that.

    Candidate Trump promised to extract our armed forces from regional skirmishes in that region.
    It is one more promise he rightly intends to keep.
    The various tribes have been fighting with each other for 1,000 years.
    Additional American sacrifice may not change much. ISIS has been virtually destroyed.
    President Trump asks, are we to keep troops in Syria forever?

    The Turks are more than willing to fill the void.
    They can hold Assad in check and insure that the Islamic State doesn’t make a military comeback.
    They can also take the lead with displaced Syrian refugees. They will deal with the ISIS POW’s.
    More importantly, they represent an important counterbalance to Iranian ambitions.

    Legitimate concerns have been expressed that we are leaving our friends, the Kurds to the tender mercies of President Erdogan’s Turkish army. Erdogan is far from a trustworthy partner and certainly no friend of the Kurds. The Kurds are not completely sinless in the lingering dispute.
    Fear of a wholesale slaughter of Kurdish fighters is not unjustified.
    Abandoning trusted allies would send a chilling message to other allies in potential hotspots around the world.
    Critics claim that keeping a campaign promise would come at a heavy price.

    Undoubtably, President Trump has weighed all of these concerns before making his decision.
    He has threatened Erdogan, saying that moves against the Kurds will have disastrous consequences.
    Turkey desperately needs the United States and Western Europe for trade and capital.
    The Turks are still extremely sensitive whenever the issue of the Armenian genocide comes up.
    They want acceptance from the West. The Turks would be ostracized by the West for generations for anything resembling a repeat genocide of the Kurds.


    Some have said that we do not want a confrontation that could lead to a war with Turkey. That is true.
    It is also safe to say that the Turks cannot afford a confrontation, not just with us, but the rest of NATO as well.
    We must assume that President Trump received assurances that there would be no Kurdish genocide.
    Although evidence today suggests otherwise, Erdogan must know that Trump doesn’t bluff.
    It would be foolhardy for him to double cross this President.

    Europeans are clucking loudly about the President’s decision.
    Perhaps it is time for them (and NATO) to step up and take our place in Syria.
    If the primary mission has morphed into serving as a tripwire, stopping potential Turkish aggression,
    wouldn’t NATO troops be just as effective?

    https://townhall.com/columnists/gilg...ments-n2554635
    You forgot to mention:
    The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    9,949
    Thanks
    15,575
    Thanked 3,689 Times in 2,658 Posts
    Groans
    10
    Groaned 1,576 Times in 1,472 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Boom.

    Why are WE always the ‘chosen ones’ [to borrow Trump’s theologically loaded phrase lol] to manage these things? It makes zero sense for our tax dollars going to NATO while NATO sits on its fricking thumbs while even more of our tax dollars goes to policing THEIR part of the world.

    Do you see NATO at our border helping to manage OUR immigration crisis? I literally made myself chuckle at the thought.

    Trump is a businessman so it’s easy to see why this sort of thing gets under his skin. All other politicians see our tax dollars as some sort inexhaustible fountain but Trump looks at it differently. One of the first things he did in foreign policy was to get NATO countries to pony-up.

    Now they can actually do something by taking over our ‘police duties’.
    Isis terrorism on the way in the USA.

  8. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    35,749
    Thanks
    10,198
    Thanked 23,929 Times in 15,631 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 1,056 Times in 1,009 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trumpet View Post
    You forgot to mention:
    The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not represent the views of Townhall.com.
    You forgot to add anything of substance lol.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  9. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    35,749
    Thanks
    10,198
    Thanked 23,929 Times in 15,631 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 1,056 Times in 1,009 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Trumpet View Post
    Isis terrorism on the way in the USA.
    Where we still have post-9/11 protections in place.

    Do you think Islamic terrorists simply decided to take a hiatus after 9/11?
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  10. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Prairieville
    Posts
    17,770
    Thanks
    1,829
    Thanked 8,051 Times in 5,359 Posts
    Groans
    330
    Groaned 2,426 Times in 2,184 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    I agree with some of that but I see little in the way of benefit, for us, in the current order.

    Which is the essence of America First. Probably a big reason Trump wouldn’t win a popularity contest amongst European leaders. They have a big stake in the status quo.

    The world order we created is a huge benefit to us. History shows the European penchant for World Wars, crematoria, Inquisitions, colonial empires and mercantalism and the like are not now likely events. Japan and Germany are unlikely to attack us again. The trade deficit is actually just an issue used by isolationists who count on peoples ignorance. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-fr...trade-deficit/ Brookings is considered center left but there is a lot available on trump using the trade deficit to pander to the ignorant

  11. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    23,780
    Thanks
    3,712
    Thanked 10,388 Times in 7,219 Posts
    Groans
    94
    Groaned 2,382 Times in 2,183 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Trump's foreign policy is not a policy at all. It is transactional and capricious and uninformed.
    There are literally 1000s of places where the US could choose at any time to withdraw. His decision to do so here and now
    was random, uninformed, dumb, and based on nothing in US national security interests.

  12. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    9,175
    Thanks
    391
    Thanked 3,007 Times in 2,312 Posts
    Groans
    308
    Groaned 193 Times in 187 Posts

    Default

    looks like leftists are really neocons aren't they?

  13. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    24,765
    Thanks
    4,446
    Thanked 4,329 Times in 3,431 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,154 Times in 3,004 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    The US can't disengage from the Middle East when it supports the criminals of Izrael and sells weapons to every country there.

    In order to disengage- as Trump said he would- both of those points require finalization. What did he do ? He went against international law and US convention and set up a US embassy in illegally-occupied Jerusalem. Then he attempted to sign off the illegally-occupied Syrian Golan to his favorite fascists.

    These acts of stupidity will cement the US presence in the Middle East for years to come.
    " First they came for the journalists...
    We don't know what happened after that . "

    Maria Ressa.

  14. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    39,147
    Thanks
    10,236
    Thanked 15,914 Times in 11,170 Posts
    Groans
    223
    Groaned 1,595 Times in 1,519 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    Boom.

    Why are WE always the ‘chosen ones’ [to borrow Trump’s theologically loaded phrase lol] to manage these things? It makes zero sense for our tax dollars going to NATO while NATO sits on its fricking thumbs while even more of our tax dollars goes to policing THEIR part of the world.

    Do you see NATO at our border helping to manage OUR immigration crisis? I literally made myself chuckle at the thought.

    Trump is a businessman so it’s easy to see why this sort of thing gets under his skin. All other politicians see our tax dollars as some sort inexhaustible fountain but Trump looks at it differently. One of the first things he did in foreign policy was to get NATO countries to pony-up.

    Now they can actually do something by taking over our ‘police duties’.
    the problem with NATO is that gad damned expansion that now has us funding the Donbass war -
    and beefing up our own beef ups (European Reassurance Initiative) to the point
    we are in a gad damned arms race to oblivion.

    I'm fine with NATO -but like you said this a partnership, not a shakedown of the USA's DoD

  15. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    35,749
    Thanks
    10,198
    Thanked 23,929 Times in 15,631 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 1,056 Times in 1,009 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by anatta View Post
    the problem with NATO is that gad damned expansion that now has us funding the Donbass war -
    and beefing up our own beef ups (European Reassurance Initiative) to the point
    we are in a gad damned arms race to oblivion.

    I'm fine with NATO -but like you said this a partnership, not a shakedown of the USA's DoD
    Useless as tits on a boar hog.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

    anatta (10-13-2019)

  17. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    life
    Posts
    39,147
    Thanks
    10,236
    Thanked 15,914 Times in 11,170 Posts
    Groans
    223
    Groaned 1,595 Times in 1,519 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moon View Post
    The US can't disengage from the Middle East when it supports the criminals of Izrael and sells weapons to every country there.

    In order to disengage- as Trump said he would- both of those points require finalization. What did he do ? He went against international law and US convention and set up a US embassy in illegally-occupied Jerusalem. Then he attempted to sign off the illegally-occupied Syrian Golan to his favorite fascists.

    These acts of stupidity will cement the US presence in the Middle East for years to come.
    we can continue of relationships where we feel the need to -like Israel, but we need not be stuck in Syria with no way out.

Similar Threads

  1. The endless right wing comedy hour.
    By jbander in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-27-2018, 04:11 PM
  2. Wealth is not endless!!!!
    By wanderingbear in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 08-22-2012, 09:08 AM
  3. Obama The Endless 'Infomercial'
    By RockX in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 09-22-2009, 07:56 AM
  4. women - the endless victims - usually by men
    By Don Quixote in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 05-31-2008, 10:17 PM
  5. Commitments To 'The War on Terror' tm
    By AnyOldIron in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 09-14-2006, 10:26 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •