Members banned from this thread: evince, Truth Detector, CFM and reagansghost


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 21

Thread: Weed Breathalyzers

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    55,670
    Thanks
    3,417
    Thanked 16,933 Times in 11,740 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 614 Times in 581 Posts

    Default Weed Breathalyzers

    I know we have a bunch of stoners on this board so figure you folks would know about this. Saw something on The Today Show that cops are using weed breathalyzers. Is this a new thing? Anyone know of someone who has been pulled over and tested?

    And stupid question but is there an obvious tell that would make an officer think someone is high?

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Hooterville by the sea
    Posts
    14,119
    Thanks
    2,005
    Thanked 7,597 Times in 5,597 Posts
    Groans
    1,016
    Groaned 305 Times in 290 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    I know we have a bunch of stoners on this board so figure you folks would know about this. Saw something on The Today Show that cops are using weed breathalyzers. Is this a new thing? Anyone know of someone who has been pulled over and tested?

    And stupid question but is there an obvious tell that would make an officer think someone is high?
    Yes Margret it's true.
    https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0827123239.htm

  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    5,224
    Thanks
    569
    Thanked 1,442 Times in 1,160 Posts
    Groans
    58
    Groaned 386 Times in 359 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    I know we have a bunch of stoners on this board so figure you folks would know about this. Saw something on The Today Show that cops are using weed breathalyzers. Is this a new thing? Anyone know of someone who has been pulled over and tested?

    And stupid question but is there an obvious tell that would make an officer think someone is high?
    Open bag of Oreos
    Nosam

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Mason? For This Post:

    Phantasmal (10-11-2019)

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    61,733
    Thanks
    16,758
    Thanked 16,479 Times in 12,316 Posts
    Groans
    626
    Groaned 1,064 Times in 1,010 Posts

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    33,839
    Thanks
    58,573
    Thanked 24,704 Times in 15,544 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2,835 Times in 2,629 Posts

    Default

    But would it work if the person consumed THC via an edible rather than smoking it?
    KAG: Keep America Grieving

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to ThatOwlWoman For This Post:

    Phantasmal (10-11-2019)

  8. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Hooterville by the sea
    Posts
    14,119
    Thanks
    2,005
    Thanked 7,597 Times in 5,597 Posts
    Groans
    1,016
    Groaned 305 Times in 290 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    But would it work if the person consumed THC via an edible rather than smoking it?
    I would say yes as the THC in the smoke can be measured why not food. If someone eats a cookie most people can smell the cookie on their breath.

    I am glad you brought that up. Years ago I had a young airman working for me that busted a pee test. When I informed the airman they said "I don't smoke it I bake it in cookies. He/she didn't know the test was for THC in the urine.

  9. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2019
    Posts
    5,224
    Thanks
    569
    Thanked 1,442 Times in 1,160 Posts
    Groans
    58
    Groaned 386 Times in 359 Posts

    Default

    Suppose you used CBD oil with no THC,is that going to be a false positive?
    Nosam

  10. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    33,839
    Thanks
    58,573
    Thanked 24,704 Times in 15,544 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2,835 Times in 2,629 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eagle-Eye View Post
    I would say yes as the THC in the smoke can be measured why not food. If someone eats a cookie most people can smell the cookie on their breath.

    I am glad you brought that up. Years ago I had a young airman working for me that busted a pee test. When I informed the airman they said "I don't smoke it I bake it in cookies. He/she didn't know the test was for THC in the urine.
    Hahahaha... poor guy. What happened to him?

    I think the pee test is the only accurate way to measure consumption of THC-containing substances. That being said, depending on the fat content of your body, THC can be measured in urine up to 30 days (or even longer) after a dose, so that isn't going to tell law enforcement that you were driving while under its influence. Just that at some point in the last month, you indulged.

    From ScienceDaily:

    "A team has developed a breathalyzer device that can measure the amount of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive compound in marijuana, in the user's breath. The breathalyzer was developed using carbon nanotubes, tiny tubes of carbon 100,000 times smaller than a human hair. Nanotechnology sensors can detect THC at levels comparable to or better than mass spectrometry, which is considered the gold standard for THC detection." (https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0827123239.htm)

    Personally, this is using science for evil instead of good.
    KAG: Keep America Grieving

  11. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    33,839
    Thanks
    58,573
    Thanked 24,704 Times in 15,544 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2,835 Times in 2,629 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Miss Margot Frank View Post
    Suppose you used CBD oil with no THC,is that going to be a false positive?
    I don't think so.

    "The breathalyzer was developed using carbon nanotubes, tiny tubes of carbon 100,000 times smaller than a human hair. The THC molecule, along with other molecules in the breath, bind to the surface of the nanotubes and change their electrical properties. The speed at which the electrical currents recover then signals whether THC is present. Nanotechnology sensors can detect THC at levels comparable to or better than mass spectrometry, which is considered the gold standard for THC detection." (https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0827123239.htm)

    CBD is not the same molecule as THC which is what the device is calibrated to look for.
    KAG: Keep America Grieving

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to ThatOwlWoman For This Post:

    Phantasmal (10-11-2019)

  13. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    51,177
    Thanks
    67,279
    Thanked 30,258 Times in 19,791 Posts
    Groans
    2,166
    Groaned 3,610 Times in 3,346 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    I don't think so.

    "The breathalyzer was developed using carbon nanotubes, tiny tubes of carbon 100,000 times smaller than a human hair. The THC molecule, along with other molecules in the breath, bind to the surface of the nanotubes and change their electrical properties. The speed at which the electrical currents recover then signals whether THC is present. Nanotechnology sensors can detect THC at levels comparable to or better than mass spectrometry, which is considered the gold standard for THC detection." (https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0827123239.htm)

    CBD is not the same molecule as THC which is what the device is calibrated to look for.
    The breathalyzer will be challenged because what level determines if the driver is impaired?

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Phantasmal For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (10-11-2019)

  15. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    33,839
    Thanks
    58,573
    Thanked 24,704 Times in 15,544 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2,835 Times in 2,629 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    The breathalyzer will be challenged because what level determines if the driver is impaired?
    That's a good point. It hasn't been legal long enough for standards on impairment to be set like there are with ETOH.
    KAG: Keep America Grieving

  16. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Federal Way, WA
    Posts
    61,733
    Thanks
    16,758
    Thanked 16,479 Times in 12,316 Posts
    Groans
    626
    Groaned 1,064 Times in 1,010 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    The breathalyzer will be challenged because what level determines if the driver is impaired?
    The states will decide, the way they do here in WA with the 0.08% alcohol law. A couple of years ago, the UW even did research into what a comparable THC level would be. Of course, the 0.08 law is a bit of a misnomer, because it also says that the officer can use discretion in determining that you are impaired.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Chaz For This Post:

    Phantasmal (10-11-2019)

  18. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    22,013
    Thanks
    1
    Thanked 10,369 Times in 6,646 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,842 Times in 1,703 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cawacko View Post
    I know we have a bunch of stoners on this board so figure you folks would know about this. Saw something on The Today Show that cops are using weed breathalyzers. Is this a new thing? Anyone know of someone who has been pulled over and tested?

    And stupid question but is there an obvious tell that would make an officer think someone is high?
    You really live in San Francisco? and you are asking how can you tell if a person is high? offer them a brownie and that would help you out. Very disappointed in you "cawacko"

  19. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Hooterville by the sea
    Posts
    14,119
    Thanks
    2,005
    Thanked 7,597 Times in 5,597 Posts
    Groans
    1,016
    Groaned 305 Times in 290 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatOwlWoman View Post
    Hahahaha... poor guy. What happened to him?

    Lucky for her she was a 1st termer. She lost a stripe (suspended) fined $30.00 a month for 3 months and 30 days extra duty. If she had been an NCO it would have been discharge under less than honorable service.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Eagle_Eye For This Post:

    ThatOwlWoman (10-11-2019)

  21. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    33,839
    Thanks
    58,573
    Thanked 24,704 Times in 15,544 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 2,835 Times in 2,629 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eagle-Eye View Post
    Lucky for her she was a 1st termer. She lost a stripe (suspended) fined $30.00 a month for 3 months and 30 days extra duty. If she had been an NCO it would have been discharge under less than honorable service.
    Wow. I heard so many stoner stories from guys who were in VN. Guess they are cracking down on drug abuse now?
    KAG: Keep America Grieving

Similar Threads

  1. The Weed Shack
    By BRUTALITOPS in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 199
    Last Post: 12-07-2019, 03:34 AM
  2. California Weed Tax
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 03-09-2018, 10:46 AM
  3. Happy Weed Day Everybody!
    By signalmankenneth in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-20-2017, 10:59 AM
  4. How to deal weed
    By Grajonca in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-21-2013, 04:40 AM
  5. Guns and Weed
    By SmarterthanYou in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-18-2010, 12:47 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •