Coal Demand at 42 Year Low

[katzgar]

whoops... https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/10/busin...ump/index.html so much for trumps coal jobs

[Blackwater Lunchbreak]

give me some coal!

I helped.

[cancel2 2022]

whoops... https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/10/busin...ump/index.html so much for trumps coal jobs

Kunzgar off his meds again!!

[Trumpet]

Kunzgar off his meds again!!

Did you forget your meds????????????????

[katzgar]

Kunzgar off his meds again!!

your assertion that trump people are fuck ups is correct.

[Into the Night]

whoops... https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/10/busin...ump/index.html so much for trumps coal jobs

CNN fake news dismissed.

In 1970, the United States produced 600 short tons of coal. By 2008, we almost doubled that production at 1172 short tons of coal. Currently, we produce a little over 1000 short tons of coal. Source: US Energy Administration annual production records

[katzgar]

CNN fake news dismissed.

In 1970, the United States produced 600 short tons of coal. By 2008, we almost doubled that production at 1172 short tons of coal. Currently, we produce a little over 1000 short tons of coal. Source: US Energy Administration annual production records

The article is about projections for the future is there anybody available that has the brains to read it to you and explain it to you so a dumb f*** like you can understand it

[cancel2 2022]

The article is about projections for the future is there anybody available that has the brains to read it to you and explain it to you so a dumb f*** like you can understand it

This cunt is always banging on about coal, so here are some facts for you Andy!!

Look at the facts: an enormous 259 gigawatts of new coal-fired capacity are under development in China. That’s on top of the 993 gigawatts of coal-burning capacity China already possesses. In addition, they are building coal power stations around the world.

The UK’s whole electrical generation capacity, in all forms of power, is 85 gigawatts. If we gave up using electricity entirely, it would make no difference at all to the impact of Chinese coal burning on the atmosphere. None, not any, zero. If we completely abolish all our fossil-fuel generation, including gas, it would likewise not matter in the slightest – except to us, our economy and our standard of living.

China’s planned increase alone, in coal power is three times the size of our whole electricity-generation industry – wind, nuclear gas, and all. India is also increasing coal generation and last March reached a coal capacity of 200 gigawatts.

Do you really think that people in Africa are going to give up the chance to have cheap access to electricity because some stupid ignorant cunt from Palookaville says so?

[katzgar]

This cunt is always banging on about coal, so here are some facts for you Andy!!

Look at the facts: an enormous 259 gigawatts of new coal-fired capacity are under development in China. That’s on top of the 993 gigawatts of coal-burning capacity China already possesses. In addition, they are building coal power stations around the world.

The UK’s whole electrical generation capacity, in all forms of power, is 85 gigawatts. If we gave up using electricity entirely, it would make no difference at all to the impact of Chinese coal burning on the atmosphere. None, not any, zero. If we completely abolish all our fossil-fuel generation, including gas, it would likewise not matter in the slightest – except to us, our economy and our standard of living.

China’s planned increase alone, in coal power is three times the size of our whole electricity-generation industry – wind, nuclear gas, and all. India is also increasing coal generation and last March reached a coal capacity of 200 gigawatts.

Do you really think that people in Africa are going to give up the chance to have cheap access to electricity because some stupid ignorant cunt from Palookaville says so?

your assertion that China will not buy US coal is correct https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-co...-idUKKCN1NP163 Your assertion that Asia is the saviour for US coal being a myth is correct. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/ar...-asian-exports

What isnt correct is trump increasing US coal jobs, that would be incorrect.

[cancel2 2022]

your assertion that China will not buy US coal is correct https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-co...-idUKKCN1NP163 Your assertion that Asia is the saviour for US coal being a myth is correct. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/ar...-asian-exports

What isnt correct is trump increasing US coal jobs, that would be incorrect.

My assertionj that you're a tedious tiresome cunt is entirely correct! I also assert that the total extra capacity being built in China is more that the total coal fired generation (227gW) in the US.

[katzgar]

I got that wrong didnt I?t!

Yes you did

[Into the Night]

The article is about projections for the future is there anybody available that has the brains to read it to you and explain it to you so a dumb f*** like you can understand it

No it isn't. It's about the use of coal today. Can't you keep track of the topic of a thread YOU STARTED???

[Into the Night]

your assertion that China will not buy US coal is correct https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-co...-idUKKCN1NP163 Your assertion that Asia is the saviour for US coal being a myth is correct. https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/ar...-asian-exports

What isnt correct is trump increasing US coal jobs, that would be incorrect.

Trump doesn't create jobs (except in government). He HAS freed up the economy though, so that a lot of jobs are being created. Those jobs are created by private companies and corporations, not Trump.
Unemployement figures have now gone lower than at any time since records have begun.

I'll give Trump his due credit, though you deny that.

[Cinnabar]

And we need to make fossil fuel just as archaic and worthless.

[Into the Night]

And we need to make fossil fuel just as archaic and worthless.

No burns fossils for fuels. Fossils don't burn. Using fossils for fuel is already quite worthless.