Page 5 of 25 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 367

Thread: Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5

  1. #61 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    90,723
    Thanks
    5,527
    Thanked 25,510 Times in 20,361 Posts
    Groans
    2,140
    Groaned 2,167 Times in 2,063 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    The full house will vote on impeachment, however the House does not have to vote to begin an impeachment inquiry.
    of course they do.......show me bit of legislation that has ever been passed by the House on the vote of a single member.......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  2. #62 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    90,723
    Thanks
    5,527
    Thanked 25,510 Times in 20,361 Posts
    Groans
    2,140
    Groaned 2,167 Times in 2,063 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gonzomin View Post
    What executive order did she TRY TO issue?
    ftfy......and the one that says an impeachment investigation has commenced........this was done by vote in the impeachment of Nixon and the impeachment of Clinton........(probably Johnson as well, but I haven't bothered to look back that far)......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  3. #63 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    90,723
    Thanks
    5,527
    Thanked 25,510 Times in 20,361 Posts
    Groans
    2,140
    Groaned 2,167 Times in 2,063 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    If the House does not like the process the investigation undertook they can vote no on impeachment.
    and if the House doesn't like the witnesses ignoring Nancy they can vote to issue subpoenas........
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  4. #64 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    90,723
    Thanks
    5,527
    Thanked 25,510 Times in 20,361 Posts
    Groans
    2,140
    Groaned 2,167 Times in 2,063 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    It doesn’t even have to be an investigation.
    and until the House votes, its not.....until it is, there is no power to issue subpoenas......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  5. #65 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,670
    Thanks
    4,417
    Thanked 17,684 Times in 11,683 Posts
    Groans
    245
    Groaned 2,750 Times in 2,485 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    and until the House votes, its not.....until it is, there is no power to issue subpoenas......
    False, The power of the house to issue subpoenas does not come from the fact of it being voted on as an impeachment investigation. Silly. If you’re truly a lawyer you know better than that.
    4,487

    *IMPEACHED


    "IN A COUPLE OF DAYS THE NUMBERS WILL BE 0"

  6. #66 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,670
    Thanks
    4,417
    Thanked 17,684 Times in 11,683 Posts
    Groans
    245
    Groaned 2,750 Times in 2,485 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    It REQUIRES A VOTE TO PROCEED. Why are the PUSSY-O-CRATS AFRAID TO VOTE ON IT?
    Who says it requires a vote? That’s stupid. There is no way that says you must vote to proceed on investigating impeachable acts.
    4,487

    *IMPEACHED


    "IN A COUPLE OF DAYS THE NUMBERS WILL BE 0"

  7. #67 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    61,670
    Thanks
    4,417
    Thanked 17,684 Times in 11,683 Posts
    Groans
    245
    Groaned 2,750 Times in 2,485 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OG Yurt View Post
    He claimed as speaker she alone could call for impeachment.
    She can call for it all day long. They can investigate it all day long. It won’t actually be an impeachment until they vote to impeach the president.
    4,487

    *IMPEACHED


    "IN A COUPLE OF DAYS THE NUMBERS WILL BE 0"

  8. #68 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    2,150
    Thanks
    42
    Thanked 1,146 Times in 814 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 47 Times in 43 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    She can call for it all day long. They can investigate it all day long. It won’t actually be an impeachment until they vote to impeach the president.
    Thanks for correcting your fellow Democrat.

  9. #69 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    38,788
    Thanks
    7,006
    Thanked 16,982 Times in 10,191 Posts
    Groans
    1,023
    Groaned 1,480 Times in 1,327 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    if you want to have an impeachment inquiry, have the vote for it. otherwise, stfu.

    democrats are all talk. once again, you are pussies that can't stand by your convictions. If you believe in it, put it to a vote. We're waiting.
    Biography:

    Grind is one of the internets most beloved and influential political thinkers and deep-level theorists in the modern era. He rose to prominence in early 2015 when he alleged, contrary to the dominant theory of christiefanism of the time, that Bill Clintons wife was indeed running for president and wasn't considering settling down to be a grandmother. In 2016, Grind was one of the key figures in proposing the new revolutionary theory of "30% is not a rare occurrence" which shook up the JPP political landscape like no other theory ever had before. His academic prowess, deep-level analysis and remarkable insight into human nature and psychology will undoubtedly result in further complexities being untangled and laid bare. He currently resides in boston, his hobbies include #rekking libs, vaping, and patriotism. You can find him in a thread near you.

    Testimonials about my patented system:

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  10. #70 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    The House decides how to go about impeachment, not the president!
    Provide the text of the above.

  11. #71 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Impeachment can only come by a vote of the full house, but the investigation can occur in any manner whatsoever, It doesn’t even have to be an investigation.
    If it isn't a formal investigation, then they have no right to issue subpoenas

  12. #72 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    13,190
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 4,738 Times in 3,156 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 961 Times in 904 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    If it isn't a formal investigation, then they have no right to issue subpoenas
    It is a formal investigation, no matter how you try to spin it. All you are doing is making excuses and a smoke screen.

  13. #73 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    False, The power of the house to issue subpoenas does not come from the fact of it being voted on as an impeachment investigation. Silly. If you’re truly a lawyer you know better than that.
    Link us up to where they can issue subpoenas without an investigation.

  14. #74 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,863
    Thanks
    98
    Thanked 4,219 Times in 3,171 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 239 Times in 227 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    It is a formal investigation, no matter how you try to spin it. All you are doing is making excuses and a smoke screen.
    clearly, by Pelosi's own words it is NOT a formal investigation.

  15. #75 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    13,190
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 4,738 Times in 3,156 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 961 Times in 904 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    clearly, by Pelosi's own words it is NOT a formal investigation.
    Please show us exactly where she said that!!

Similar Threads

  1. SOTU Article II Section 3
    By Bourbon in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-24-2019, 11:30 AM
  2. APP - The Establishment Clause of the First Ammendment - What does it mean?
    By Truth Detector in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-08-2014, 08:08 AM
  3. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-12-2013, 12:29 AM
  4. Article I, Section 8
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-12-2011, 03:57 PM
  5. Onion Article or Real Article?
    By Bonestorm in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-05-2010, 01:51 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •