Page 5 of 25 FirstFirst 12345678915 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 75 of 367

Thread: Article 1, Section 2, Clause 5

  1. #61 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    83,128
    Thanks
    4,532
    Thanked 21,722 Times in 17,545 Posts
    Groans
    2,012
    Groaned 2,109 Times in 2,006 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    The full house will vote on impeachment, however the House does not have to vote to begin an impeachment inquiry.
    of course they do.......show me bit of legislation that has ever been passed by the House on the vote of a single member.......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  2. #62 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    83,128
    Thanks
    4,532
    Thanked 21,722 Times in 17,545 Posts
    Groans
    2,012
    Groaned 2,109 Times in 2,006 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gonzomin View Post
    What executive order did she TRY TO issue?
    ftfy......and the one that says an impeachment investigation has commenced........this was done by vote in the impeachment of Nixon and the impeachment of Clinton........(probably Johnson as well, but I haven't bothered to look back that far)......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  3. #63 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    83,128
    Thanks
    4,532
    Thanked 21,722 Times in 17,545 Posts
    Groans
    2,012
    Groaned 2,109 Times in 2,006 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    If the House does not like the process the investigation undertook they can vote no on impeachment.
    and if the House doesn't like the witnesses ignoring Nancy they can vote to issue subpoenas........
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  4. #64 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    83,128
    Thanks
    4,532
    Thanked 21,722 Times in 17,545 Posts
    Groans
    2,012
    Groaned 2,109 Times in 2,006 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    It doesn’t even have to be an investigation.
    and until the House votes, its not.....until it is, there is no power to issue subpoenas......
    Isaiah 6:5
    “Woe to me!” I cried. “I am ruined! For I am a man of unclean lips, and I live among a people of unclean lips, and my eyes have seen the King, the Lord Almighty.”

  5. #65 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,847
    Thanks
    4,121
    Thanked 16,157 Times in 10,808 Posts
    Groans
    245
    Groaned 2,187 Times in 2,014 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PostmodernProphet View Post
    and until the House votes, its not.....until it is, there is no power to issue subpoenas......
    False, The power of the house to issue subpoenas does not come from the fact of it being voted on as an impeachment investigation. Silly. If you’re truly a lawyer you know better than that.
    4,487

    Zelensky: I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps, specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes....

    Drumpf: I would like you to do us a favor though


    "It is impossible that the Whistleblower is the hero and I am not. Rudy Giuliani will be the hero here."

  6. #66 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,847
    Thanks
    4,121
    Thanked 16,157 Times in 10,808 Posts
    Groans
    245
    Groaned 2,187 Times in 2,014 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    It REQUIRES A VOTE TO PROCEED. Why are the PUSSY-O-CRATS AFRAID TO VOTE ON IT?
    Who says it requires a vote? That’s stupid. There is no way that says you must vote to proceed on investigating impeachable acts.
    4,487

    Zelensky: I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps, specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes....

    Drumpf: I would like you to do us a favor though


    "It is impossible that the Whistleblower is the hero and I am not. Rudy Giuliani will be the hero here."

  7. #67 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    58,847
    Thanks
    4,121
    Thanked 16,157 Times in 10,808 Posts
    Groans
    245
    Groaned 2,187 Times in 2,014 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by OG Yurt View Post
    He claimed as speaker she alone could call for impeachment.
    She can call for it all day long. They can investigate it all day long. It won’t actually be an impeachment until they vote to impeach the president.
    4,487

    Zelensky: I would also like to thank you for your great support in the area of defense. We are ready to continue to cooperate for the next steps, specifically we are almost ready to buy more Javelins from the United States for defense purposes....

    Drumpf: I would like you to do us a favor though


    "It is impossible that the Whistleblower is the hero and I am not. Rudy Giuliani will be the hero here."

  8. #68 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    1,769
    Thanks
    7
    Thanked 934 Times in 679 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 35 Times in 31 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    She can call for it all day long. They can investigate it all day long. It won’t actually be an impeachment until they vote to impeach the president.
    Thanks for correcting your fellow Democrat.

  9. #69 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    37,992
    Thanks
    6,847
    Thanked 16,127 Times in 9,731 Posts
    Groans
    1,013
    Groaned 1,442 Times in 1,294 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    if you want to have an impeachment inquiry, have the vote for it. otherwise, stfu.

    democrats are all talk. once again, you are pussies that can't stand by your convictions. If you believe in it, put it to a vote. We're waiting.
    Biography:

    Grind is one of the internets most beloved and influential political thinkers and deep-level theorists in the modern era. He rose to prominence in early 2015 when he alleged, contrary to the dominant theory of christiefanism of the time, that Bill Clintons wife was indeed running for president and wasn't considering settling down to be a grandmother. In 2016, Grind was one of the key figures in proposing the new revolutionary theory of "30% is not a rare occurrence" which shook up the JPP political landscape like no other theory ever had before. His academic prowess, deep-level analysis and remarkable insight into human nature and psychology will undoubtedly result in further complexities being untangled and laid bare. He currently resides in boston, his hobbies include #rekking libs, vaping, and patriotism. You can find him in a thread near you.

    Testimonials about my patented system:

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  10. #70 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,622
    Thanks
    96
    Thanked 4,048 Times in 3,038 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 231 Times in 219 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    The House decides how to go about impeachment, not the president!
    Provide the text of the above.

  11. #71 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,622
    Thanks
    96
    Thanked 4,048 Times in 3,038 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 231 Times in 219 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    Impeachment can only come by a vote of the full house, but the investigation can occur in any manner whatsoever, It doesn’t even have to be an investigation.
    If it isn't a formal investigation, then they have no right to issue subpoenas

  12. #72 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    9,510
    Thanks
    77
    Thanked 3,297 Times in 2,260 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 382 Times in 374 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    If it isn't a formal investigation, then they have no right to issue subpoenas
    It is a formal investigation, no matter how you try to spin it. All you are doing is making excuses and a smoke screen.

  13. #73 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,622
    Thanks
    96
    Thanked 4,048 Times in 3,038 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 231 Times in 219 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jarod View Post
    False, The power of the house to issue subpoenas does not come from the fact of it being voted on as an impeachment investigation. Silly. If you’re truly a lawyer you know better than that.
    Link us up to where they can issue subpoenas without an investigation.

  14. #74 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    7,622
    Thanks
    96
    Thanked 4,048 Times in 3,038 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 231 Times in 219 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    It is a formal investigation, no matter how you try to spin it. All you are doing is making excuses and a smoke screen.
    clearly, by Pelosi's own words it is NOT a formal investigation.

  15. #75 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    9,510
    Thanks
    77
    Thanked 3,297 Times in 2,260 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 382 Times in 374 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Superfreak View Post
    clearly, by Pelosi's own words it is NOT a formal investigation.
    Please show us exactly where she said that!!

Similar Threads

  1. SOTU Article II Section 3
    By Bourbon in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 01-24-2019, 12:30 PM
  2. APP - The Establishment Clause of the First Ammendment - What does it mean?
    By Truth Detector in forum Above Plain Politics Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-08-2014, 09:08 AM
  3. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-12-2013, 01:29 AM
  4. Article I, Section 8
    By cawacko in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-12-2011, 04:57 PM
  5. Onion Article or Real Article?
    By Bonestorm in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-05-2010, 02:51 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •