Asking a real question, not just trolling JPP leftists.
Let's say Obama is in his 1st term and he learns Cheney had some shady doings in Iraq. So he leans on the Iraqi govt to investigate what happened. And let's say Cheney decides to run in 2012. Does this mean Obama admin MUST halt all investigations and ask Iraq to back off, because he is now a "domestic rival?"
What if a former VP has committed murder. The current admin has to stop because he/she decided to run for potus? This argument makes no sense, and is weak.
On the other foot. I could see Trump trying to use this to his advantage for sure, and his China threat was just as dumb. But again don't admins have the right to investigate? They are the executive branch.
-Irish
Keep changing the names. It doesn't change the meaning.
Abortion
Pro-Choice
Women's rights
Women's Health
Phantasmal (10-08-2019), Trumpet (10-08-2019)
Trumpet (10-08-2019)
Trumpet (10-08-2019)
That's not how we do things in a democratic republic such as America, comrade.
Your Kremlin overlords did not do a proper job educating you on our system.
The president is not a dictator who decides if his political opponents are to be investigated.
That was the fertile terrain of your beloved Comrade Stalin.
In the United States of America, a purportedly non-partisan Department of Justice, and U.S. Attorneys decide what if any alleged crimes need to be investigated using proper standards of evidence, inquiry, and examination.
Irish (10-08-2019)
reagansghost (10-08-2019), Trumpet (10-08-2019)
anonymoose (10-08-2019), Irish (10-08-2019)
Phantasmal (10-08-2019)
Bookmarks