1. What's wrong with a bigger government? The alternative are big insurance companies that are unaccountable and profit-focused instead of outcome-focused.
2. The spending actually goes down because you're not paying as much in taxes as you are in premiums, deductibles, copays, coinsurance, dental, vision, hospital fees, ambulance fees, and drug costs. I refer back to my OP, but will also remind you that the average worker spends $7,100 for health care whereas that same average worker would spend just $2,440 for health care in M4A.
3. What government control? What are you talking about? Right now, private insurance companies control it all. They're the ones colluding with providers to set artificially high costs for health care so that both can make a profit.
How does M4A, which establishes a 7.5% tax on business income, give the business a tax break when it's setting a tax rate?Giving business tax breaks for providing heath insurance does not accomplish these goals.
This is your laziness coming through.
Bookmarks