Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: "Impeachment": A Partisan Charade

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    30,591
    Thanks
    18,199
    Thanked 15,616 Times in 10,680 Posts
    Groans
    202
    Groaned 617 Times in 606 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default "Impeachment": A Partisan Charade

    Jut more DELIBERATE, COORDINATED, BULLSHIT and LIES from the INCREASINGLY DESPERATE LIE-O-CRATS/FAKE NEWS..and now , The Parade of PAID DNC 'Whistleblowers' ":





    Impeachment: A Partisan Charade



    If you think the Democrats' impeachment charade is anything other than yet another orchestrated political hit job against the president, I have a bridge I want to sell you. Take a look at some of the latest eye-opening revelations, which should give all voters pause before blindly marching in the Democrats' impeachment parade.

    The Federalist reported recently that the intelligence community inspector general secretly changed the rule requiring whistleblowers to have firsthand knowledge when submitting a complaint. The change allowed the politically biased whistleblower to file a complaint against the president using secondhand information. "In its press release, the ICIG also explicitly admitted it changed its policies because of the anti-Trump complaint, raising significant questions about whether the watchdog cooked its own books to justify its treatment of the anti-Trump complaint," said Sean Davis, co-founder of The Federalist.


    If that suspicious rule change and its timing don't raise red flags, what does?

    First off, no agency within the Department of Justice should ever be using hearsay or secondhand information to target a political opponent or trigger an investigation. That's how our country got dragged into the whole Russian collusion controversy of the past three years, which triggered multiple costly investigations -- including Mueller's special counsel probe -- stemming from a discredited dossier that former FBI Director James Comey told Congress was "unverified and salacious."

    Result? After a $32 million taxpayer-funded witch hunt to derail the Trump administration, the special counsel found no evidence of Russian collusion, despite what we were told -- for years -- by the #FakeNewsMedia and partisans like House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and his Democratic colleagues. Evidently, the deep-state operatives in the intelligence inspector general's office have short memories; they've allowed a whistleblower complaint to be filed based on hearsay and secondhand information to impeach the president of the United States.


    It's a total undoing of our democracy -- founded on free elections in which the people get to choose their representatives, not rogue deep-state operatives embedded in the intelligence community.


    Why did the whistleblower commiserate with Schiff's office and seek guidance on filing the complaint? They could've gone to the CIA's human resources department, the Office of Legal Counsel, the Senate Judiciary Committee or elsewhere. But no. The "whistleblower" went directly to Schiff, Donald Trump's chief nemesis, who's been on a multiyear crusade to remove the president from office by any means necessary -- even if that means spreading false information and peddling conspiracy theories.

    Moreover, Schiff failed to disclose to fellow members of the House Intelligence Committee that the whistleblower made contact with his office. Instead, he misled the American people about it. During a TV appearance on Sept. 17, Schiff told the media: "We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower. We would like to."


    We now know he lied. The question Americans must ask is why.


    And then there's Schiff's fabrication and misreading of the president's July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. During a televised congressional hearing last week with millions watching, the extremely partisan Democrat didn't read from the official transcript. Instead, he inserted his own opinions and false statements in what he says was a "parody."

    Which begs the question: If the president's phone call with the Ukrainian leader was so damning that it warranted an impeachment inquiry -- as Democrats and the #FakeNewsMedia insist it is -- why didn't Schiff just read directly from the transcript instead of making things up?

    In response, GOP leader Kevin McCarthy tweeted on Wednesday: "Chairman Adam Schiff has been lying to the American people for years. Now he is so desperate to damage the president that he literally made up a false version of a phone call. Enough is enough. I have signed a resolution to censure Schiff in the House of Representatives."






    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...de_141408.html
    TRUMP WILL TAKE FORTY STATES...UNLESS THE SAME IDIOTS WHO BROUGHT US THE 2020 DUNCE-O-CRAT IOWA CLUSTERFUCK CONTINUE THEIR SEDITIOUS ACTIVITIES...THEN HE WILL WIN EVEN MORE ..UNLESS THE RED CHINESE AND DNC COLLUDE, USE A PANDEMIC, AND THEN THE DEMOCRATS VIOLATE ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION, TO FACILLITATE MILLIONS OF ILLEGAL, UNVETTED, MAIL IN BALLOTS IN THE DARK OF NIGHT..


    De Oppresso Liber

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Grokmaster For This Post:

    Stretch (10-08-2019)

  3. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    This is all an attempt to get the Senate to force Trump to resign.

    Pelosi will not call an impeachment vote. She will blame McConnell

    Watch Louisiana election coming up. You will see a backlash against democrats. But they still won’t learn.

  4. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    Jut more DELIBERATE, COORDINATED, BULLSHIT and LIES from the INCREASINGLY DESPERATE LIE-O-CRATS/FAKE NEWS..and now , The Parade of PAID DNC 'Whistleblowers' ":





    Impeachment: A Partisan Charade



    If you think the Democrats' impeachment charade is anything other than yet another orchestrated political hit job against the president, I have a bridge I want to sell you. Take a look at some of the latest eye-opening revelations, which should give all voters pause before blindly marching in the Democrats' impeachment parade.

    The Federalist reported recently that the intelligence community inspector general secretly changed the rule requiring whistleblowers to have firsthand knowledge when submitting a complaint. The change allowed the politically biased whistleblower to file a complaint against the president using secondhand information. "In its press release, the ICIG also explicitly admitted it changed its policies because of the anti-Trump complaint, raising significant questions about whether the watchdog cooked its own books to justify its treatment of the anti-Trump complaint," said Sean Davis, co-founder of The Federalist.


    If that suspicious rule change and its timing don't raise red flags, what does?

    First off, no agency within the Department of Justice should ever be using hearsay or secondhand information to target a political opponent or trigger an investigation. That's how our country got dragged into the whole Russian collusion controversy of the past three years, which triggered multiple costly investigations -- including Mueller's special counsel probe -- stemming from a discredited dossier that former FBI Director James Comey told Congress was "unverified and salacious."

    Result? After a $32 million taxpayer-funded witch hunt to derail the Trump administration, the special counsel found no evidence of Russian collusion, despite what we were told -- for years -- by the #FakeNewsMedia and partisans like House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and his Democratic colleagues. Evidently, the deep-state operatives in the intelligence inspector general's office have short memories; they've allowed a whistleblower complaint to be filed based on hearsay and secondhand information to impeach the president of the United States.


    It's a total undoing of our democracy -- founded on free elections in which the people get to choose their representatives, not rogue deep-state operatives embedded in the intelligence community.


    Why did the whistleblower commiserate with Schiff's office and seek guidance on filing the complaint? They could've gone to the CIA's human resources department, the Office of Legal Counsel, the Senate Judiciary Committee or elsewhere. But no. The "whistleblower" went directly to Schiff, Donald Trump's chief nemesis, who's been on a multiyear crusade to remove the president from office by any means necessary -- even if that means spreading false information and peddling conspiracy theories.

    Moreover, Schiff failed to disclose to fellow members of the House Intelligence Committee that the whistleblower made contact with his office. Instead, he misled the American people about it. During a TV appearance on Sept. 17, Schiff told the media: "We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower. We would like to."


    We now know he lied. The question Americans must ask is why.


    And then there's Schiff's fabrication and misreading of the president's July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. During a televised congressional hearing last week with millions watching, the extremely partisan Democrat didn't read from the official transcript. Instead, he inserted his own opinions and false statements in what he says was a "parody."

    Which begs the question: If the president's phone call with the Ukrainian leader was so damning that it warranted an impeachment inquiry -- as Democrats and the #FakeNewsMedia insist it is -- why didn't Schiff just read directly from the transcript instead of making things up?

    In response, GOP leader Kevin McCarthy tweeted on Wednesday: "Chairman Adam Schiff has been lying to the American people for years. Now he is so desperate to damage the president that he literally made up a false version of a phone call. Enough is enough. I have signed a resolution to censure Schiff in the House of Representatives."






    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...de_141408.html
    There's nothing partisan about going after criminals, you stupid whore.

    twump has led a life of crime, and it's ending.

    Your tears are delicious!

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CharacterAssassin View Post
    There's nothing partisan about going after criminals, you stupid whore.

    twump has led a life of crime, and it's ending.

    Your tears are delicious!
    That is why Trump wants Biden investigated. We need to know.

  6. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    That is why Trump wants Biden investigated. We need to know.
    Newp. Already been investigated and cleared by the Ukrainians.

    Why do you fantasize about eating twump's shit?

  7. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grokmaster View Post
    Jut more DELIBERATE, COORDINATED, BULLSHIT and LIES from the INCREASINGLY DESPERATE LIE-O-CRATS/FAKE NEWS..and now , The Parade of PAID DNC 'Whistleblowers' ":





    Impeachment: A Partisan Charade



    If you think the Democrats' impeachment charade is anything other than yet another orchestrated political hit job against the president, I have a bridge I want to sell you. Take a look at some of the latest eye-opening revelations, which should give all voters pause before blindly marching in the Democrats' impeachment parade.

    The Federalist reported recently that the intelligence community inspector general secretly changed the rule requiring whistleblowers to have firsthand knowledge when submitting a complaint. The change allowed the politically biased whistleblower to file a complaint against the president using secondhand information. "In its press release, the ICIG also explicitly admitted it changed its policies because of the anti-Trump complaint, raising significant questions about whether the watchdog cooked its own books to justify its treatment of the anti-Trump complaint," said Sean Davis, co-founder of The Federalist.


    If that suspicious rule change and its timing don't raise red flags, what does?

    First off, no agency within the Department of Justice should ever be using hearsay or secondhand information to target a political opponent or trigger an investigation. That's how our country got dragged into the whole Russian collusion controversy of the past three years, which triggered multiple costly investigations -- including Mueller's special counsel probe -- stemming from a discredited dossier that former FBI Director James Comey told Congress was "unverified and salacious."

    Result? After a $32 million taxpayer-funded witch hunt to derail the Trump administration, the special counsel found no evidence of Russian collusion, despite what we were told -- for years -- by the #FakeNewsMedia and partisans like House Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and his Democratic colleagues. Evidently, the deep-state operatives in the intelligence inspector general's office have short memories; they've allowed a whistleblower complaint to be filed based on hearsay and secondhand information to impeach the president of the United States.


    It's a total undoing of our democracy -- founded on free elections in which the people get to choose their representatives, not rogue deep-state operatives embedded in the intelligence community.


    Why did the whistleblower commiserate with Schiff's office and seek guidance on filing the complaint? They could've gone to the CIA's human resources department, the Office of Legal Counsel, the Senate Judiciary Committee or elsewhere. But no. The "whistleblower" went directly to Schiff, Donald Trump's chief nemesis, who's been on a multiyear crusade to remove the president from office by any means necessary -- even if that means spreading false information and peddling conspiracy theories.

    Moreover, Schiff failed to disclose to fellow members of the House Intelligence Committee that the whistleblower made contact with his office. Instead, he misled the American people about it. During a TV appearance on Sept. 17, Schiff told the media: "We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower. We would like to."


    We now know he lied. The question Americans must ask is why.


    And then there's Schiff's fabrication and misreading of the president's July phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. During a televised congressional hearing last week with millions watching, the extremely partisan Democrat didn't read from the official transcript. Instead, he inserted his own opinions and false statements in what he says was a "parody."

    Which begs the question: If the president's phone call with the Ukrainian leader was so damning that it warranted an impeachment inquiry -- as Democrats and the #FakeNewsMedia insist it is -- why didn't Schiff just read directly from the transcript instead of making things up?

    In response, GOP leader Kevin McCarthy tweeted on Wednesday: "Chairman Adam Schiff has been lying to the American people for years. Now he is so desperate to damage the president that he literally made up a false version of a phone call. Enough is enough. I have signed a resolution to censure Schiff in the House of Representatives."






    https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...de_141408.html
    You do realize that that article, written by a Trump surrogate, is introduced with the three year Mueller investigation, which wasn't Democrats, Mueller was a Republican appointed by a Republican Justice Dept by a Trump hand picked Assistant AG

    Then she moves in to parliamentary changes made by the Democrat House, which almost identically modeled the alterations made by the previous GOP House to isolate Democrats, facts she conveniently left out, and throwing McCarthy as a source is laughable

    Then we have the personal attacks on Schiff, half of which have been debunked, and the remainder which are irrelevant to what is occurring, a weak "whataboutism"

    And of course at this point it is partisan, the Democrats control the House, just as the last decade of GOP House investigations into everything Obama/Hillary was partisan, stop crying, what goes around comes around, in the end the American public will decide, and currently they ain't leaning Trump's way

  8. The Following User Groans At archives For This Awful Post:

    Stretch (10-08-2019)

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    Guno צְבִי (10-06-2019)

  10. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2018
    Posts
    24,892
    Thanks
    4,196
    Thanked 15,334 Times in 9,321 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 2,825 Times in 2,563 Posts
    Blog Entries
    6

  11. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CharacterAssassin View Post
    Newp. Already been investigated and cleared by the Ukrainians.

    Why do you fantasize about eating twump's shit?
    Show me where they were exonerated

  12. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Show me where they were exonerated
    Again?

    "Former Ukrainian prosecutor who investigated a gas company tied to Hunter Biden said Thursday that there was no evidence the former vice president's son engaged in illegal activity."

    "From the perspective of Ukrainian legislation, he did not violate anything,” Yuriy Lutsenko"

    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/don...-says-n1059136
    https://www.latimes.com/politics/sto...ongdoing-biden
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49871909
    https://www.businessinsider.com/ukra...plained-2019-9
    https://www.apnews.com/9d4595ba4f3140c6bb6a3473a91f4a4c

    I think I recall in the first time that no matter how many times the facts are revealed to you you are never going to believe them, looks like you proved me correct

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to archives For This Post:

    CharacterAssassin (10-06-2019)

  14. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    6,649
    Thanks
    2,024
    Thanked 2,146 Times in 1,528 Posts
    Groans
    19
    Groaned 429 Times in 408 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Show me where they were exonerated
    LOL! Good to see a dishonest gutter whore like you get smacked around by someone else.

    ^^^^ PWNED

  15. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    This is all an attempt to get the Senate to force Trump to resign.

    Pelosi will not call an impeachment vote. She will blame McConnell

    Watch Louisiana election coming up. You will see a backlash against democrats. But they still won’t learn.
    Is there any crime that Donald could commit that you would hold him accountable? ANY?

  16. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Gone to the mattresses
    Posts
    22,458
    Thanks
    1,135
    Thanked 11,622 Times in 8,086 Posts
    Groans
    874
    Groaned 639 Times in 618 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by floridafan View Post
    Is there any crime that Donald could commit that you would hold him accountable? ANY?
    Any real crime

    If he shot you I would applaud

  17. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Posts
    25,590
    Thanks
    79
    Thanked 9,916 Times in 6,548 Posts
    Groans
    2
    Groaned 1,882 Times in 1,756 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teflon Don View Post
    Any real crime

    If he shot you I would applaud
    By now you have noticed that Donald has never once said "I'm sorry" Never once said "I made a mistake" Never once said "I was wrong". Always, and ever its someone else's fault.

  18. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    THREAD FAIL

  19. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    34,576
    Thanks
    5,715
    Thanked 15,145 Times in 10,539 Posts
    Groans
    100
    Groaned 2,987 Times in 2,752 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Grok is a total fail traitor and moron

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 79
    Last Post: 05-31-2019, 03:21 PM
  2. "Fox News has always been partisan. But has it become propaganda?"
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 03-14-2019, 08:58 AM
  3. "Kavanaugh's impartiality questioned after partisan attacks"
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 09-29-2018, 04:28 AM
  4. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-05-2018, 01:48 PM
  5. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-12-2017, 09:12 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •