Attorney for Impeachment ‘Whistleblowers’ Actively Sought Trump Admin Informants

[dukkha]

Rubbish, there are lawyers who have specialties, this is no different.

the Constitution is rubbish..got it

the lawyer is an activist -soliciting D. S. Creeps -al just fine and dandy

[Phantasmal]

the Constitution is rubbish..got it

the lawyer is an activist -soliciting D. S. Creeps -al just fine and dandy

Just your misguided interpretation, I think it is you who fears discovery.

[dukkha]

Just your misguided interpretation, I think it is you who fears discovery.

projection. i'm not further feeding your paranoia.. but there is nothing "misguided" about confronting ones accuser

[archives]

Mark Zaid, the activist attorney representing the so-called whistleblower at the center of the impeachment movement targeting President Donald Trump, says he is representing a second so-called whistleblower who spoke to the Intelligence Community’s inspector general about Trump’s phone call with the Ukrainian president.

Missing from the avalanche of news media coverage about Zaid’s two anonymous clients rocking the nation’s capital is that at the beginning of Trump’s presidency Zaid co-founded Whistleblower Aid, a small nonprofit that blasted advertisements around D.C. actively seeking whistleblowers during the Trump administration.

Whistleblower Aid is heavily tied to far-left activist organizations and Democratic politics.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...in-informants/

The Deep State has a thousand “whistleblowers” all to be trotted out between now and the election. That’s a lot of scripts for them to write!

This BS will never even get to the Senate.

The Dims are scared to death of discovery.

Via Breitfart, next

[dukkha]

Via Breitfart, next

the info looks to be correct.

[Phantasmal]

projection. i'm not further feeding your paranoia.. but there is nothing "misguided" about confronting ones accuser

I’m not paranoid, that’s your bag. There is no need for him to smear, that’s what Donnie would do, his accusers. They have been found credible, that’s all that matters. Their identities need protection, it’s the law.

[archives]

Possible political bias' of whistleblower mentioned by inspector general
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/n...tered-democrat

he's much more then a "registered Dem" -he's a Dem activist

"Possible political bias ....... mentioned"

"Possible" to the right means start the innuendo, by the fifth time it is repeated, it will become the fact

[archives]

the info looks to be correct.

come on "dukka," sites as brietfart frame facts to make them appear correct, and given breitfart's history, you can pretty much assume what they offer is bogus

[dukkha]

I’m not paranoid, that’s your bag. There is no need for him to smear, that’s what Donnie would do, his accusers. They have been found credible, that’s all that matters. Their identities need protection, it’s the law.

who said "smeaar" (more projection). .it's clear the Democratic atty set this up
and the CIA has a vendetta for Trump ( I chalk it up to Russiaphobia as seen by the Russian collusion hoax)
but i'm sure it's more as Chuck Schumer said about the "IC screwing you 6 way from Sunday"

and don't tell me about WB -POTUS is exempt from WB law..

the Creeps knew though the press would get bent, and the spineless politicians would cave. same as it ever was.

The CIA loves their Cold war 2.0 -and Trump threatened to work for peace instead w/Russia.

so now we are in the middle of Ukraine politics!! trying to figure out who and who is not corrupt ( they ALL ARE)

[dukkha]

come on "dukka," sites as brietfart frame facts to make them appear correct, and given breitfart's history, you can pretty much assume what they offer is bogus

the basic facts look correct. I'm sure they spin

[dukkha]

"Possible political bias ....... mentioned"

"Possible" to the right means start the innuendo, by the fifth time it is repeated, it will become the fact

that was because he was simply a registered DEm.

Now we are finding out he was handled by a Dem activist atty -who CLEARLY has bias

[archives]

the basic facts look correct. I'm sure they spin

They take facts and frame them offering innuendo to imply what the facts mean

Did they offer any proof of their claim that "Whistleblower Aid is heavily tied to far-left activist organizations and Democratic politics.?" It is an important part of narrative, yet they offer little except reference to associates and of course they drop Hillary and Soros names easily identified with the left to confirm their intended implications

Did they offer any verification other than "reportedly" that "Whistleblower Aid actively sought to attract the attention of Trump administration government employees by reportedly blasting advertisements?" No, yet left the impression that the group actively sought out whistleblowers eager to burn Trump

And an irony is that in one short phrase they acknowledge that the cofounder was himself a whistleblower, which they don't explain was during the Obama Administration

Typical breitfart

[archives]

that was because he was simply a registered DEm.

Now we are finding out he was handled by a Dem activist atty -who CLEARLY has bias

Robert Mueller was a registered Republican, as were those that appointed him, says nothing, and you are confirming what I noted above, by the third or fourth repetition, the right will call the "possible" fact

[CharacterAssassin]

projection. i'm not further feeding your paranoia.. but there is nothing "misguided" about confronting ones accuser

That's only applicable in court, you stupid cunt.

[dukkha]

They take facts and frame them offering innuendo to imply what the facts mean

Did they offer any proof of their claim that "Whistleblower Aid is heavily tied to far-left activist organizations and Democratic politics.?" It is an important part of narrative, yet they offer little except reference to associates and of course they drop Hillary and Soros names easily identified with the left to confirm their intended implications

Did they offer any verification other than "reportedly" that "Whistleblower Aid actively sought to attract the attention of Trump administration government employees by reportedly blasting advertisements?" No, yet left the impression that the group actively sought out whistleblowers eager to burn Trump

And an irony is that in one short phrase they acknowledge that the cofounder was himself a whistleblower, which they don't explain was during the Obama Administration

Typical breitfart

they ALL SPIN.
Trying to read HuffPo for ex. where Trump is regurally referred to as "criminal"
or so many times I can't count he was a "Russian asset".

But look at the facts.

the atty is an activist -he advertised for WB
Schiff staff steered him to this dweeb
This dweeb wrote up a lawyerly piece instead of simply assisting in a complaint -again being an activist.

why is he holding back on a 2nd complaintent? because he want another media bomb

the whole thing reeks of CIA and Dem collusion -just like the FBI invstigation