Centerleftfl (10-06-2019), christiefan915 (10-06-2019), moon (10-06-2019), PoliTalker (10-06-2019), reagansghost (10-08-2019), ThatOwlWoman (10-06-2019), Trumpet (10-06-2019)
Centerleftfl (10-06-2019), christiefan915 (10-06-2019), moon (10-06-2019), PoliTalker (10-06-2019), reagansghost (10-08-2019), ThatOwlWoman (10-06-2019), Trumpet (10-06-2019)
Everyone knows that the first "spy" is no longer credible since he LIED on the face of the complaint, that there are untruths in the complaint and he must have had help crating the complaint.
So HEY look here we got another one!
So why didn’t this “eye witness” file the initial complaint?
Next.
Earl (10-06-2019)
the republican party is Russian dirty to its core
the Russians also stole the republican party emails when they stole the Democratic party ones
The Russians have all the republican party dirt
and there are mountains of it
USFREEDOM911 (10-06-2019)
reagansghost (10-08-2019), Trumpet (10-06-2019)
Just was gonna put that up. NO 'may' anymore. It's official and he has lawyered up. His attorney WROTE the Whistleblower law when he was at the CIA. He worked for the DOD as well.
https://www.washingtonian.com/2019/0...hment-inquiry/
EXPECT MORE.
Attorney says he's representing second Trump whistleblower from intel community
BY JUSTIN WISE - 10/06/19 09:29 AM EDT 68
© Aaron Schwartz
Attorney Andrew P. Bakaj on Sunday confirmed that his firm is representing another whistleblower in connection to a formal complaint about President Trump's alleged interactions with Ukraine.
"I can confirm that my firm and my team represent multiple whistleblowers in connection to the underlying August 12, 2019, disclosure to the Intelligence Community Inspector General," Bakaj said on Twitter.
Mark Zaid, another attorney at the same firm representing the original whistleblower who raised issues regarding Trump's contacts with Ukraine, also told ABC News that he was representing a second whistleblower who had spoken with the head of the intelligence community's internal watchdog office, Michael Atkinson.
Zaid described the second official as an intelligence official and noted that the unidentified figure has first-hand knowledge of some of the allegations included in the complaint.
Last edited by Centerleftfl; 10-06-2019 at 08:12 AM.
WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same
christiefan915 (10-06-2019), Guno צְבִי (10-06-2019), ThatOwlWoman (10-06-2019)
From CNN:
The lawyer for the first intelligence whistleblower who came forward with accusations concerning President Donald Trump and his interactions with Ukraine said Sunday he is representing a second whistleblower regarding the President's actions.
Attorney Mark Zaid confirmed to CNN that he and other lawyers on his team are now representing the second person. Zaid told CNN that the second whistleblower is from the intelligence community and has spoken to the intelligence community's inspector general, but has not filed their own complaint and doesn't need to as anyone who speaks to inspector watchdog is considered to have made a protected disclosure and is a whistleblower under law.
Attorney Andrew Bakaj, also representing the whistleblowers, tweeted Sunday, "I can confirm that my firm and my team represent multiple whistleblowers in connection to the underlying August 12, 2019, disclosure to the Intelligence Community Inspector General. No further comment at this time."
https://www.cnn.com/2019/10/06/polit...ine/index.html
Time to flush the orange turd!
"Conservatism is the blind and fear-filled worship of dead radicals." -- Mark Twain
Guno צְבִי (10-06-2019), Trumpet (10-06-2019)
Guno צְבִי (10-06-2019), ThatOwlWoman (10-06-2019), Trumpet (10-06-2019)
Deep State Part Two - So Orchestrated it is past contrived.
Guno צְבִי (10-06-2019), Trumpet (10-06-2019)
Having first-hand knowledge of a call that was completely legal, makes no difference. The second-hand knowledge whistleblower was not going to be able to make the case against Trump, so Schiff and company scrambled to find somebody with ‘first-hand’ knowledge. Unless any one of them can prove wrongdoing with the call, they’ll both blow Schiff’s chances for a coup against Trump.
Second-hand/first-hand: unless they can fabricate and prove something different from what’s in the call transcript, it’s game over !
TRUMP'S appointees are turning on HIM! Were they deep staters when he hired him or became deep staters after they 'turned' on him?
Wow! How do you not get WHIPLASH?
Would you trust this DEEP STATER to advise and consent your foreign policy? (I wouldn't let him in my house to hook up my cable).
PS Thank god Bannon isn't a girl, 'she'd' be called a SKANK!
Last edited by Centerleftfl; 10-06-2019 at 08:13 AM.
WK1 3/28-/4 _Cases 301k--Dead 18.1k Lethality 2.72%
WK2 4/5-/13 _Cases 555k--Dead 22.1K Lethality 3.9%
WK3 4/20-/21 Cases 774k -Dead 37.2K Lethality 4.8%
WK4 4/22-/29 Cases 1M --Dead 58.8K Lethality 5.9%
WK5 5/1-/8__ Cases 1.3M -Dead 75.7K Lethality 6.1%
WK6 5/9-16__Cases 1.4M --Dead 85.8K Lethality 6.1%
WK7 5/17-24_Cases 1.7M - Dead 97.6K Lethality 5.9%
WK8 5/28 Cases 1.7M - DEAD 101.2K - Same
christiefan915 (10-06-2019), ThatOwlWoman (10-06-2019), Trumpet (10-06-2019)
It was the world's most perfect phone call.
Earl (10-06-2019), USFREEDOM911 (10-06-2019)
Another one, eh. Find a tub-thumper and they'll have the makings of a marching band. Haw, haw....................haw.
Trump impeachment: Second whistleblower emerges
A second whistleblower has come forward in the impeachment case against US President Donald Trump, according to lawyers representing the first one.
Mark Zaid told ABC News the second person was also an intelligence official and they had spoken to the inspector general.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-49953225
Bolton will do. Haw, haw...........................haw.
" First they came for the journalists...
We don't know what happened after that . "
Maria Ressa.
PoliTalker (10-06-2019), ThatOwlWoman (10-06-2019), Trumpet (10-06-2019)
Bookmarks