As the Schiff/Ukraine LIES Collapse, DEMLIARS Suddenly Have "2nd Whistelblower"

[RB 60]

better chill, more coming

not looking good for the Don

We've been hearing that for over 2 1/2 years...

[Grokmaster]

Nothing but ANOTHER LIE-O-CRAT, trying to convince us to believe HIS/HER LIES, instead of the ACTUAL FACTS....

[Stretch]

No, they are SCRAMBLING to produce more 'witnesses" now that the MADEUP BULLSHIT HAS COLLAPSED.


Fucking IDIOTS.....the TRANSCRIPT IS ALREADY PUBLIC.....NO QUID PRO QUO.


This is nothing BUT MORE MADEUP, LIE-O-CRAT BULLSHIT FROM SCHIFF....

"the TRANSCRIPT IS ALREADY PUBLIC"
^^^ THIS ^^^

It doesn't matter if a hundred more leakers come forward......."the TRANSCRIPT IS ALREADY PUBLIC"......
nothing can be legally added or subtracted from it.

[archives]

Another "UNNAMED" DNC OPERATIVE. naturally.

We'll "hear" from him/her as soon as the LIE-O-CRATS think that they've "scrubbed" the ties to SCHIFF and the DNC....



Michael Avenatti will be showing up with his "whistleblower" shortly....


Americans see right through this SEDITIOUS BULLSHIT....

If everything is "falling apart" and "Americans see through this .......," why do the majority of Americans approve of the inquiry?

This one needs to turn off the radio and get out more, a lot more

[archives]

"the TRANSCRIPT IS ALREADY PUBLIC"
^^^ THIS ^^^

It doesn't matter if a hundred more leakers come forward......."the TRANSCRIPT IS ALREADY PUBLIC"......
nothing can be legally added or subtracted from it.

Sean, Rush, or even Donny himself couldn't have said it any better, unfortunately few Americans are buying that line, even though Trump has all his surrogates and apologists out there now pushing it, must be they realized the prior deflection of Trump supposed concern with corruption wasn't selling

If anything, the transcript validates the majority of what the whistleblower claimed, Trump solicited "favors" from a foreign country to help in his reelection campaign. Now on top of that, is the possible implication that he was holding up needed aid to achieve this personal end, which the second whistleblower may or may not offer proof.

They are worried in the White House, you can tell from the army of surrogates they sent out to cover the Sunday talk shows attemting to muddle facts by screaming designed talking points

[Stretch]

Sean, Rush, or even Donny himself couldn't have said it any better, unfortunately few Americans are buying that line, even though Trump has all his surrogates and apologists out there now pushing it, must be they realized the prior deflection of Trump supposed concern with corruption wasn't selling

If anything, the transcript validates the majority of what the whistleblower claimed, Trump solicited "favors" from a foreign country to help in his reelection campaign. Now on top of that, is the possible implication that he was holding up needed aid to achieve this personal end, which the second whistleblower may or may not offer proof.

They are worried in the White House, you can tell from the army of surrogates they sent out to cover the Sunday talk shows attemting to muddle facts by screaming designed talking points

So, you're the only one in the entire country who refuses to believe that the transcript was released? Figures.

[floridafan]

So, you're the only one in the entire country who refuses to believe that the transcript was released? Figures.

Partial transcript!

[Stretch]

Both leakers are irrelevant now. We have the actual transcript. We don't need either of them for Op Ed purposes.
The transcript sans the editorial is sufficient. It does not require embellishment.

[Earl]

“There was no “quid pro quo” requested of Ukraine related to security aid, former U.S. Envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker told lawmakers in a closed-door session.

Sources familiar with Volker’s testimony Thursday said the former diplomat rejected repeated assertions by House Democrats that Trump dangled security aid in exchange for cooperation from Ukraine in investigating former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.

“He testified that the Ukrainians were not pressured, they never raised the issue of a quid pro quo with Volker, and they did not view the president’s call or subsequent interactions to be inappropriate,” the source told the Washington Examiner.”9

washingtonexaminer.com

[Earl]

Both leakers are irrelevant now. We have the actual transcript. We don't need either of them for Op Ed purposes.
The transcript sans the editorial is sufficient. It does not require embellishment.

Indeed and it does not require intentional misinterpretation by the left.

[archives]

So, you're the only one in the entire country who refuses to believe that the transcript was released? Figures.

Let's try it again, the transcript of Trump's phone call validates the majority of what the whistleblower claimed, Trump solicited "favors" from a foreign country to help in his reelection campaign. Now on top of that is the possible implication that he was holding up needed aid to achieve this personal end, which the second whistleblower may or may not offer proof.

[Stretch]

Let's try it again, the transcript of Trump's phone call validates the majority of what the whistleblower claimed, Trump solicited "favors" from a foreign country to help in his reelection campaign. Now on top of that is the possible implication that he was holding up needed aid to achieve this personal end, which the second whistleblower may or may not offer proof.

So, we don't need the leaker then since we have the actual transcript. The leaker might
have been handy if Trump refused to be transparent, but he was.

[evince]

So, you're the only one in the entire country who refuses to believe that the transcript was released? Figures.

go get it

[Earl]

“There was no “quid pro quo” requested of Ukraine related to security aid, former U.S. Envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker told lawmakers in a closed-door session.

Sources familiar with Volker’s testimony Thursday said the former diplomat rejected repeated assertions by House Democrats that Trump dangled security aid in exchange for cooperation from Ukraine in investigating former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.

“He testified that the Ukrainians were not pressured, they never raised the issue of a quid pro quo with Volker, and they did not view the president’s call or subsequent interactions to be inappropriate,” the source told the Washington Examiner.”9

washingtonexaminer.com

[archives]

“There was no “quid pro quo” requested of Ukraine related to security aid, former U.S. Envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker told lawmakers in a closed-door session.

Sources familiar with Volker’s testimony Thursday said the former diplomat rejected repeated assertions by House Democrats that Trump dangled security aid in exchange for cooperation from Ukraine in investigating former Vice President Joe Biden and his son, Hunter Biden.

“He testified that the Ukrainians were not pressured, they never raised the issue of a quid pro quo with Volker, and they did not view the president’s call or subsequent interactions to be inappropriate,” the source told the Washington Examiner.”9

washingtonexaminer.com

"earl," the no "quid pro quo" deflection was like two defenses ago, even the White House has abondoned that one, we have moved on thru the Trump was concerned with corruption BS, and now have returned to the "it was a perfect call" line

Plus the whistle blower's complaint did imply a "quid pro quo," as did Trump's phone call, you do this "favor" for us and we'll release the aid Trump was holding up, and perhaps the second whistle blower complaint will further confirm the implication perhaps not, we'll see