Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 35

Thread: The amber guyger jury -- ONLY 2 WHITES, 10 non-whites

  1. #16 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2018
    Posts
    4,646
    Thanks
    3,445
    Thanked 2,707 Times in 1,843 Posts
    Groans
    717
    Groaned 616 Times in 532 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Text Drivers are Killers View Post
    I think so too. This was not murder but black women hate pretty white women and will do anything they can to hurt them.
    People probably shouldn't encourage you trolltard but you're such a weirdly bemusing little hellion. It's like you're plastered with kick me signs.

  2. #17 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Ravenhenge in the Northwoods
    Posts
    36,958
    Thanks
    63,651
    Thanked 27,899 Times in 17,441 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,291 Times in 3,050 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crocodile View Post
    People probably shouldn't encourage you trolltard but you're such a weirdly bemusing little hellion. It's like you're plastered with kick me signs.
    LOL... funny. In my case he's plastered with "You are ignoring this racist moron" signs.
    “Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.” -- Gandhi

  3. #18 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    15,405
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,305 Times in 1,876 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,451 Times in 1,204 Posts

    Default

    One thing is clear - the jurors are morons. They said murder and then gave her only 10 years. I'd have said manslaughter and 15 years.
    Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals put together!

    It's only fair that the press is biased towards liberals since the public is biased towards conservatives.

    When the guns are gone, EVERYTHING IS GONE.

  4. #19 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    10,670
    Thanks
    413
    Thanked 2,487 Times in 2,022 Posts
    Groans
    167
    Groaned 92 Times in 90 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Text Drivers are Killers View Post
    This was manslaughter not murder.
    She purposely shot him with the intent to kill. That is murder.

  5. #20 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    18,860
    Thanks
    6,258
    Thanked 8,365 Times in 5,538 Posts
    Groans
    1,842
    Groaned 1,400 Times in 1,290 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cinnabar View Post
    She is not even pretty so that's a moot point
    She's cute.

    I agree that it should've been manslaughter, though.
    https://i.postimg.cc/PqVCnGks/gojoe1.jpg

  6. #21 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    18,860
    Thanks
    6,258
    Thanked 8,365 Times in 5,538 Posts
    Groans
    1,842
    Groaned 1,400 Times in 1,290 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    She purposely shot him with the intent to kill. That is murder.
    The (black female) judge instructed the jury that the Castle Doctrine applied because she thought she was in her own apartment.
    https://i.postimg.cc/PqVCnGks/gojoe1.jpg

  7. #22 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    10,670
    Thanks
    413
    Thanked 2,487 Times in 2,022 Posts
    Groans
    167
    Groaned 92 Times in 90 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    The (black female) judge instructed the jury that the Castle Doctrine applied because she thought she was in her own apartment.
    That is a defense, but manslaughter is when the person does not intend to kill the person. Murder is when the intent is to kill (although there may be a defense to that crime).

  8. #23 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    40,992
    Thanks
    9,559
    Thanked 10,662 Times in 8,001 Posts
    Groans
    42
    Groaned 4,340 Times in 3,676 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    That is a defense, but manslaughter is when the person does not intend to kill the person. Murder is when the intent is to kill (although there may be a defense to that crime).
    In Texas, there is "capital murder" and "murder". Seems like this was the correct charge.

  9. #24 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    10,670
    Thanks
    413
    Thanked 2,487 Times in 2,022 Posts
    Groans
    167
    Groaned 92 Times in 90 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    In Texas, there is "capital murder" and "murder". Seems like this was the correct charge.
    The capital murder laws (murder for hire, killing a police officer or firefighter in line of duty, while committing a felony, etc.) were passed in response to the 1970's Supreme Court decision striking down death penalty laws because so few people actually received the death penalty. States had to narrow the range of murders subject to that penalty to those examples the public was most likely to find more serious and give the death penalty.

  10. #25 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Posts
    40,992
    Thanks
    9,559
    Thanked 10,662 Times in 8,001 Posts
    Groans
    42
    Groaned 4,340 Times in 3,676 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    The capital murder laws (murder for hire, killing a police officer or firefighter in line of duty, while committing a felony, etc.) were passed in response to the 1970's Supreme Court decision striking down death penalty laws because so few people actually received the death penalty. States had to narrow the range of murders subject to that penalty to those examples the public was most likely to find more serious and give the death penalty.
    It appears that the "murder" charge in Texas is fairly equivalent to second degree murder in other states.

  11. #26 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    10,670
    Thanks
    413
    Thanked 2,487 Times in 2,022 Posts
    Groans
    167
    Groaned 92 Times in 90 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by domer76 View Post
    It appears that the "murder" charge in Texas is fairly equivalent to second degree murder in other states.
    2nd degree murder in Texas is when it was done under sudden passion (but still intended). 1st degree is when the person intended to shoot the victim. Premeditation is not really a factor since premeditation can be formed in a split second.

  12. #27 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    15,405
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,305 Times in 1,876 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,451 Times in 1,204 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flash View Post
    She purposely shot him with the intent to kill. That is murder.
    HAHAHA. What a stupid thing to say. According to you if she had killed the guy in self defense, it would be murder.!!
    Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals put together!

    It's only fair that the press is biased towards liberals since the public is biased towards conservatives.

    When the guns are gone, EVERYTHING IS GONE.

  13. #28 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    15,405
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 2,305 Times in 1,876 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 1,451 Times in 1,204 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    The (black female) judge instructed the jury that the Castle Doctrine applied because she thought she was in her own apartment.
    But she WASN'T in her own apartment so hell with castle.
    Reckless drivers are a bigger threat to you than all other criminals put together!

    It's only fair that the press is biased towards liberals since the public is biased towards conservatives.

    When the guns are gone, EVERYTHING IS GONE.

  14. #29 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Posts
    18,860
    Thanks
    6,258
    Thanked 8,365 Times in 5,538 Posts
    Groans
    1,842
    Groaned 1,400 Times in 1,290 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Text Drivers are Killers View Post
    But she WASN'T in her own apartment so hell with castle.
    The Castle Doctrine applies if she BELIEVED she was in her own home.
    https://i.postimg.cc/PqVCnGks/gojoe1.jpg

  15. #30 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    10,670
    Thanks
    413
    Thanked 2,487 Times in 2,022 Posts
    Groans
    167
    Groaned 92 Times in 90 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Text Drivers are Killers View Post
    HAHAHA. What a stupid thing to say. According to you if she had killed the guy in self defense, it would be murder.!!
    If the prosecutor believed it was self-defense she would probably not have been charged. If the jury believed it was self-defense she would have been found not guilty. Self-defense is an affirmative defense meaning the defendant must prove the facts to support her case.

Similar Threads

  1. Amber Guyger found GUILTY OF MURDER
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 10-06-2019, 12:45 PM
  2. Guilty Verdict Against Amber Guyger
    By guno in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: 10-02-2019, 11:13 PM
  3. Amber Guyger’s Murder Trial Won’t Move From Dallas
    By guno in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-17-2019, 08:51 PM
  4. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 12-03-2018, 04:52 AM
  5. Hung jury for black charged w burning to death white teen. WHITES DO NOT RIOT.
    By Text Drivers are Killers in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 10-20-2017, 11:41 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •