Definition of a 'Progressive Democrat' or a 'Progressive Liberal'

[Libhater]

I wrote the following piece back when the Hildebeast and Obama were in the political spotlight. I've been posting on political forums since the 1980s when our great Ronald Reagan was president, so I have a complete understanding of correctly defining your every day liberal or leftist.

When you hear the political term 'Progressive Democrat' or 'Progressive Liberal'-- you'll now know that 'Progressive' means the steady rise of every brainwashed, dope smoking, easily led, tuned-out drop out that couldn't accept individual responsibility, and couldn't accept and relate to the current 'establishment', or to our competitive economy that was fueled by Capitalism. You could include the Kerry's, the Kennedy's, and the Clinton's into the 60's drop out mix that helped start their progressive apprenticeship of attending Ivy League Liberal college institutions where their initiation into the world of political science was shaped from the teachings of pin-headed anti-establishment Communist professors like Noam Chompsky or a Lionell West of Harvard.

The progressive path of 'Democrat Liberalism fully subscribe to Karl Marx's philosophical theory of creating a 'classless society' where class struggle pit's the proletarian, composed of (industrial workers, makers of goods, or unions of today) against the bourgeois or 'Capitalists' (in this case the Republicans, Conservatives, Capitalists, Entrepreneurs, and pro Americans).

Marx's vision or idealism was to see the proletarian (industrial workers and unions of today) overthrow the bourgeois (Republicans and Capitalists of today). Once that objective was met and the proletariat became the de facto ruling class--they would then 'centralize' with a collective mind set all instruments of production in the hands of the state, or in the hands of our government (in keeping with modern times)--thus increasing productive forces at a rapid rate.

Bottom line is that Marx wanted to inadvertently wanted to strip all people of their individualism, of their desire to set meaningful goals, of their desire and or capacity to invent, or their desire to make no-limit monies, or their desire to progress or climb the ladder, or their desire to succeed in life, or their desire or ability to think for themselves...etc, etc. Marx's goal to basically shackle people into a life of indirect servitude was to be accomplished and coerced with the aid of the state, or in modern times with the aid of big government.

Marx's 'classless society' would not find fruition until classes fought one another, and not until the Capitalist was rendered obsolete.

Hillary is a true Marxist in that she riles Capitalists and Capitalism by promoting class warfare. Actually, every Democratic Liberal is a true Marxist as they engage in class warfare.

Here are but a few of their rants:

"The rich keep getting richer, while the poor get poorer"
"Tax breaks for the filthy rich"
"Corporate welfare"
"Republicans want to starve our children and our elderly"
"Republicans want to reduce Medicare benefits for the affirmed and elderly"
"This is becoming a society of the 'haves' and 'have-nots'"

Liberal-Marxists resort to whining, playing the victim, blaming the rich or Capitalist for their own sorry lot in life, and their late 20th early 21st century scheme to foment fear in the public domain (with the help of their black congressional caucus leaders) by playing the liberal victim race card to the hilt. You may have noticed (with good reason) that there isn't a single black Republican congressman or congresswoman member of that racist congressional black caucus.

You've all heard of welfare/welfare cheats, food-stamps, quotas, affirmative action, minority discrimination, monetary reparations for centuries old black injustices, more leniency and shorter prison time for the disproportionately higher set jail terms to blacks that are now overpopulating our penitentiaries, and more money and better-equipped state-of-the-art medical facilities for the needs of the many black welfare crack whores that are busy strutting their scourge throughout the ghetto streets.

So, here is the question to any of you on the political left side:

Is there anything remotely enticing, remotely favorable, remotely American, remotely pleasing, or remotely inspirational about being a Liberal/Marxist? Please feel free to list all your best Liberal qualities.

[Nordberg]

That right-wing manifesto was insane. You have serious hate problems and absolutely no idea of what the left is comprised of. Republican policies are class warfare. They are what have created the worst wealth gap ever, worse than the Gilded Age. Countries do not do well when the gap gets out of line.
You are one of the rightys who has been fooled into thinking the poor are taking your super duper hardest working ever money. You are looking in the wrong direction. Your money was trickling up and now it is gushing, and you cannot see it past your hate colored glasses. You are an obvious bigot and proud of it.

[Geeko Sportivo]

Setting all the Bla! Bla! Bla! aside, you made some valid points about liberal progressives.

I just ignored your comments about Obama and Hillary though, as they are no-way progressives. Neither is Biden. Those 3 are what is referred to as Moderate Democrats!

I know they were all-in for creating a National Healthcare plan, that eventually became popular on both sides of the aisle, after Obama and Hillary left office.

But even Nixon was working on developing a National Healthcare system when his admin failed and he stepped down! And he was no progressive either.

[NiftyNiblick]

This has always been my definition.

A progressive liberal in America generally believes in a more comprehensive public sector and a more regulated private sector.
A progressive liberal does not believe that people living in a civilized society are entitled to freedom from social responsibly.
Conservatives call it intrusive government.
Liberals call its absence anarchy.

Despite not being the slightest bit "woke," I consider myself to be a progressive liberal.

[Saint Guinefort]

I wrote the following piece back when the Hildebeast and Obama were in the political spotlight. I've been posting on political forums since the 1980s when our great Ronald Reagan was president, so I have a complete understanding of correctly defining your every day liberal or leftist.

When you hear the political term 'Progressive Democrat' or 'Progressive Liberal'-- you'll now know that 'Progressive' means the steady rise of every brainwashed, dope smoking, easily led, tuned-out drop out that couldn't accept individual responsibility, and couldn't accept and relate to the current 'establishment', or to our competitive economy that was fueled by Capitalism. You could include the Kerry's, the Kennedy's, and the Clinton's into the 60's drop out mix that helped start their progressive apprenticeship of attending Ivy League Liberal college institutions where their initiation into the world of political science was shaped from the teachings of pin-headed anti-establishment Communist professors like Noam Chompsky or a Lionell West of Harvard.

The progressive path of 'Democrat Liberalism fully subscribe to Karl Marx's philosophical theory of creating a 'classless society' where class struggle pit's the proletarian, composed of (industrial workers, makers of goods, or unions of today) against the bourgeois or 'Capitalists' (in this case the Republicans, Conservatives, Capitalists, Entrepreneurs, and pro Americans).

Marx's vision or idealism was to see the proletarian (industrial workers and unions of today) overthrow the bourgeois (Republicans and Capitalists of today). Once that objective was met and the proletariat became the de facto ruling class--they would then 'centralize' with a collective mind set all instruments of production in the hands of the state, or in the hands of our government (in keeping with modern times)--thus increasing productive forces at a rapid rate.

Bottom line is that Marx wanted to inadvertently wanted to strip all people of their individualism, of their desire to set meaningful goals, of their desire and or capacity to invent, or their desire to make no-limit monies, or their desire to progress or climb the ladder, or their desire to succeed in life, or their desire or ability to think for themselves...etc, etc. Marx's goal to basically shackle people into a life of indirect servitude was to be accomplished and coerced with the aid of the state, or in modern times with the aid of big government.

Marx's 'classless society' would not find fruition until classes fought one another, and not until the Capitalist was rendered obsolete.

Hillary is a true Marxist in that she riles Capitalists and Capitalism by promoting class warfare. Actually, every Democratic Liberal is a true Marxist as they engage in class warfare.

Here are but a few of their rants:

"The rich keep getting richer, while the poor get poorer"
"Tax breaks for the filthy rich"
"Corporate welfare"
"Republicans want to starve our children and our elderly"
"Republicans want to reduce Medicare benefits for the affirmed and elderly"
"This is becoming a society of the 'haves' and 'have-nots'"

Liberal-Marxists resort to whining, playing the victim, blaming the rich or Capitalist for their own sorry lot in life, and their late 20th early 21st century scheme to foment fear in the public domain (with the help of their black congressional caucus leaders) by playing the liberal victim race card to the hilt. You may have noticed (with good reason) that there isn't a single black Republican congressman or congresswoman member of that racist congressional black caucus.

You've all heard of welfare/welfare cheats, food-stamps, quotas, affirmative action, minority discrimination, monetary reparations for centuries old black injustices, more leniency and shorter prison time for the disproportionately higher set jail terms to blacks that are now overpopulating our penitentiaries, and more money and better-equipped state-of-the-art medical facilities for the needs of the many black welfare crack whores that are busy strutting their scourge throughout the ghetto streets.

So, here is the question to any of you on the political left side:

Is there anything remotely enticing, remotely favorable, remotely American, remotely pleasing, or remotely inspirational about being a Liberal/Marxist? Please feel free to list all your best Liberal qualities.

"Bless you, my son...."

[Saint Guinefort]

[NiftyNiblick]

I wrote the following piece back when the Hildebeast and Obama were in the political spotlight. I've been posting on political forums since the 1980s when our great Ronald Reagan was president, so I have a complete understanding of correctly defining your every day liberal or leftist.

When you hear the political term 'Progressive Democrat' or 'Progressive Liberal'-- you'll now know that 'Progressive' means the steady rise of every brainwashed, dope smoking, easily led, tuned-out drop out that couldn't accept individual responsibility, and couldn't accept and relate to the current 'establishment', or to our competitive economy that was fueled by Capitalism. You could include the Kerry's, the Kennedy's, and the Clinton's into the 60's drop out mix that helped start their progressive apprenticeship of attending Ivy League Liberal college institutions where their initiation into the world of political science was shaped from the teachings of pin-headed anti-establishment Communist professors like Noam Chompsky or a Lionell West of Harvard.

The progressive path of 'Democrat Liberalism fully subscribe to Karl Marx's philosophical theory of creating a 'classless society' where class struggle pit's the proletarian, composed of (industrial workers, makers of goods, or unions of today) against the bourgeois or 'Capitalists' (in this case the Republicans, Conservatives, Capitalists, Entrepreneurs, and pro Americans).

Marx's vision or idealism was to see the proletarian (industrial workers and unions of today) overthrow the bourgeois (Republicans and Capitalists of today). Once that objective was met and the proletariat became the de facto ruling class--they would then 'centralize' with a collective mind set all instruments of production in the hands of the state, or in the hands of our government (in keeping with modern times)--thus increasing productive forces at a rapid rate.

Bottom line is that Marx wanted to inadvertently wanted to strip all people of their individualism, of their desire to set meaningful goals, of their desire and or capacity to invent, or their desire to make no-limit monies, or their desire to progress or climb the ladder, or their desire to succeed in life, or their desire or ability to think for themselves...etc, etc. Marx's goal to basically shackle people into a life of indirect servitude was to be accomplished and coerced with the aid of the state, or in modern times with the aid of big government.

Marx's 'classless society' would not find fruition until classes fought one another, and not until the Capitalist was rendered obsolete.

Hillary is a true Marxist in that she riles Capitalists and Capitalism by promoting class warfare. Actually, every Democratic Liberal is a true Marxist as they engage in class warfare.

Here are but a few of their rants:

"The rich keep getting richer, while the poor get poorer"
"Tax breaks for the filthy rich"
"Corporate welfare"
"Republicans want to starve our children and our elderly"
"Republicans want to reduce Medicare benefits for the affirmed and elderly"
"This is becoming a society of the 'haves' and 'have-nots'"

Liberal-Marxists resort to whining, playing the victim, blaming the rich or Capitalist for their own sorry lot in life, and their late 20th early 21st century scheme to foment fear in the public domain (with the help of their black congressional caucus leaders) by playing the liberal victim race card to the hilt. You may have noticed (with good reason) that there isn't a single black Republican congressman or congresswoman member of that racist congressional black caucus.

You've all heard of welfare/welfare cheats, food-stamps, quotas, affirmative action, minority discrimination, monetary reparations for centuries old black injustices, more leniency and shorter prison time for the disproportionately higher set jail terms to blacks that are now overpopulating our penitentiaries, and more money and better-equipped state-of-the-art medical facilities for the needs of the many black welfare crack whores that are busy strutting their scourge throughout the ghetto streets.

So, here is the question to any of you on the political left side:

Is there anything remotely enticing, remotely favorable, remotely American, remotely pleasing, or remotely inspirational about being a Liberal/Marxist? Please feel free to list all your best Liberal qualities.

I would suggest that this post is more than sufficient proof that the poster needs to be committed to a psychiatric hospital.
We can directly blame our lack of a National Health Service for having to endure this wastefulness of bandwidth on the internet.
If he/she/it is not imminently rehabilitatable, then euthanasia is the only humane choice.

[Yakuda]

I wrote the following piece back when the Hildebeast and Obama were in the political spotlight. I've been posting on political forums since the 1980s when our great Ronald Reagan was president, so I have a complete understanding of correctly defining your every day liberal or leftist.

When you hear the political term 'Progressive Democrat' or 'Progressive Liberal'-- you'll now know that 'Progressive' means the steady rise of every brainwashed, dope smoking, easily led, tuned-out drop out that couldn't accept individual responsibility, and couldn't accept and relate to the current 'establishment', or to our competitive economy that was fueled by Capitalism. You could include the Kerry's, the Kennedy's, and the Clinton's into the 60's drop out mix that helped start their progressive apprenticeship of attending Ivy League Liberal college institutions where their initiation into the world of political science was shaped from the teachings of pin-headed anti-establishment Communist professors like Noam Chompsky or a Lionell West of Harvard.

The progressive path of 'Democrat Liberalism fully subscribe to Karl Marx's philosophical theory of creating a 'classless society' where class struggle pit's the proletarian, composed of (industrial workers, makers of goods, or unions of today) against the bourgeois or 'Capitalists' (in this case the Republicans, Conservatives, Capitalists, Entrepreneurs, and pro Americans).

Marx's vision or idealism was to see the proletarian (industrial workers and unions of today) overthrow the bourgeois (Republicans and Capitalists of today). Once that objective was met and the proletariat became the de facto ruling class--they would then 'centralize' with a collective mind set all instruments of production in the hands of the state, or in the hands of our government (in keeping with modern times)--thus increasing productive forces at a rapid rate.

Bottom line is that Marx wanted to inadvertently wanted to strip all people of their individualism, of their desire to set meaningful goals, of their desire and or capacity to invent, or their desire to make no-limit monies, or their desire to progress or climb the ladder, or their desire to succeed in life, or their desire or ability to think for themselves...etc, etc. Marx's goal to basically shackle people into a life of indirect servitude was to be accomplished and coerced with the aid of the state, or in modern times with the aid of big government.

Marx's 'classless society' would not find fruition until classes fought one another, and not until the Capitalist was rendered obsolete.

Hillary is a true Marxist in that she riles Capitalists and Capitalism by promoting class warfare. Actually, every Democratic Liberal is a true Marxist as they engage in class warfare.

Here are but a few of their rants:

"The rich keep getting richer, while the poor get poorer"
"Tax breaks for the filthy rich"
"Corporate welfare"
"Republicans want to starve our children and our elderly"
"Republicans want to reduce Medicare benefits for the affirmed and elderly"
"This is becoming a society of the 'haves' and 'have-nots'"

Liberal-Marxists resort to whining, playing the victim, blaming the rich or Capitalist for their own sorry lot in life, and their late 20th early 21st century scheme to foment fear in the public domain (with the help of their black congressional caucus leaders) by playing the liberal victim race card to the hilt. You may have noticed (with good reason) that there isn't a single black Republican congressman or congresswoman member of that racist congressional black caucus.

You've all heard of welfare/welfare cheats, food-stamps, quotas, affirmative action, minority discrimination, monetary reparations for centuries old black injustices, more leniency and shorter prison time for the disproportionately higher set jail terms to blacks that are now overpopulating our penitentiaries, and more money and better-equipped state-of-the-art medical facilities for the needs of the many black welfare crack whores that are busy strutting their scourge throughout the ghetto streets.

So, here is the question to any of you on the political left side:

Is there anything remotely enticing, remotely favorable, remotely American, remotely pleasing, or remotely inspirational about being a Liberal/Marxist? Please feel free to list all your best Liberal qualities.

Except for Joe Manchin liberals no longer exist. The remainder are leftists. Leftists are evil and seek the destruction of America and to a larger extent western civilization.

[Libhater]

Except for Joe Manchin liberals no longer exist. The remainder are leftists. Leftists are evil and seek the destruction of America and to a larger extent western civilization.

Liberals are liberals. Liberals are leftists. Liberals are Marxists. Liberals are Progressives. I'm talking about modern day liberals, not, classical liberalism of the old days which I would consider myself to be one of them. I did notice that not one liberal or leftist could give me even one reason why they should remain a Marxist, or one reason to favor that un-anti American ideology. They just can't handle the truth about their sick and destructive political ideology. And the message in my avatar reinforces my correct definition of a liberal democrat.

[PostmodernProphet]

That right-wing manifesto was insane. You have serious hate problems and absolutely no idea of what the left is comprised of. Republican policies are class warfare. They are what have created the worst wealth gap ever, worse than the Gilded Age. Countries do not do well when the gap gets out of line.
You are one of the rightys who has been fooled into thinking the poor are taking your super duper hardest working ever money. You are looking in the wrong direction. Your money was trickling up and now it is gushing, and you cannot see it past your hate colored glasses. You are an obvious bigot and proud of it.

interesting you didn't even deny any of what he posted........

[PostmodernProphet]

I just ignored your comments about Obama and Hillary though, as they are no-way progressives. Neither is Biden. Those 3 are what is referred to as Moderate Democrats!

I could see where a hard core Marxist could think that......

[T. A. Gardner]

A Progressive "Liberal" is a...

Sock puppet that believes Marx wasn't all that wrong and that Socialism will work this time, that humanity can be convinced--by force if necessary--to be altruistic, that all people are physically, mentally, and in all other respects equal meaning anyone can do any job or anything else.

Thus, the Progressive thinks that an idiot can be a professor of nuclear physics, a man can be a woman, children and adults are equal in capacity, and that redistribution of wealth is a good thing because those who can will willingly give all that they produce to those that do and have nothing.

They think the purpose of life is to be able to while it away in blissful peace while not doing a damn thing all day long because government will provide them free everything they need.

And, lastly, for the Progressive, if you don't accept and kowtow to all of the above, you need to be put in a reeducation camp until your attitude improves no matter how many beatings and electro-shock treatments you need...

[goat]

Your definition is right here.

[Yakuda]

Your definition is right here.

From L to R: Idiot, Moron, Piglosi, Retard

[ThatOwlWoman]

[hands out raincoats to whoever's reading this thread]

Let's make the OP regressive knuckle-dragger's head explode, shall we?

Why Are Highly Educated Americans Getting More Liberal?

It's a well-worn (if not-entirely-agreed-upon) idea that college makes people more liberal. But a new report adds a twist to this: the most educated Americans have grown increasingly liberal over the last couple of decades.

A report from the Pew Research Center finds a wide partisan gap between highly educated and non-highly-educated Americans. Not only that, but the share of college grads and post-graduates who are "consistently liberal" (based on their answers to a series of policy questions) has grown sharply in the last 20 years.

In 1994, 7 percent of post-grads were "consistently liberal," and 1 percent of people with high school educations or less were — not much of a difference. Today, the gap is 25 points wide — 31 percent of people with post-grad educations are consistently liberal, compared to 5 percent of those with high school educations or less.

The same kind of change just hasn't happened on the conservative side.

Split it out by party, and the shift is even starker. Among the post-grad set, more than half of Democrats and Democratic-leaners today are "consistently liberal," up from fewer than one-in-five in 1994. Likewise, among college grads, it jumped from 12 to 47.

And now we know why Reichtards like the OP hate higher education. It is their natural enemy.