Warren passes Biden, takes the lead in prized Iowa poll

[PostmodernProphet]

interesting fact.......in 1976, Jimmy Carter came in second in the Iowa Democrat caucus.........none of the above came in first........https://data.desmoinesregister.com/i...tory/#1976/dem

[Into the Night]

And this is the bottom mine. Republicans HATE democracy

Absolutely. Well, they SHOULD. Democracies are unstable forms of government. They quickly dissolve into oligarchies and dictatorships. There are no democracies currently in the world today.
The United States is a federated republic, not a democracy. We have constitutions. Democracies have none.

and have been working at destroying it since forever.

No need. There are currently no democracies in the world today.

They cannot handle the concept or the work and responsibility it takes to make a democracy function for everyone.

They don't function for everyone. They don't function for long, either.

This is why they lost their collective shit when Obama made the statement..."You didn't build that." They could not handle the ramifications and truthfulness of that statement.

It wasn't a true statement. It was sheer arrogance.

They do indeed prefer and are more comfortable in a system of serfs and lords

No, that would be the Democrats.

while telling others that they stand for independence and individual responsibility and rights.

It is what conservatives stand for. This is what capitalism is.

They get their panties in a wad when a black athlete exercises their Constitutional right to peaceful protest and takes a knee during the national anthem

The Constitution does not apply to private businesses. The NFL and each of their teams are private businesses. The Constitution applies only to government. It defines that government and what powers it has.
The player has to right to peaceful protest. He doesn't have that right to do it on company time.

because the right loves this country so much they are willing to blow off its mountain tops,

Just a few!

pollute its air, water and soil

No. Private companies clean up air and water. I myself do that as part of my company. Stick in your left nostril, ingrate. Define 'pollution'.

and decimate its wildlife

Void argument fallacy. Be specific.

Perhaps it might help you to look at China, Russia, and Venezuela, and other such vacation spots to see just what socialism does to the environment.

[Nomad]

Nominating a centrist didn't work out in 2016, so there's no reason to think it would work out in 2020.

Typically overly simplistic prog analysis.

It's fault of the idiot prog Bernie Bots that we got stuck with Trump to begin with.

Now they want to fuck us over again.

[Irish]

That's where Trump is going to flee the moment he leaves office - no extradition!

Shut up FAGGOT!

[LV426]

Typically overly simplistic prog analysis.

It's fault of the idiot prog Bernie Bots that we got stuck with Trump to begin with.

Now they want to fuck us over again.

No. It's not Bernie voters who caused Trump to win; it was racist, gullible shitheels in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin who voted for Trump.

Let's place blame where blame truly lies.

[LV426]

Shut up FAGGOT!

Crybaby.

[LV426]

It's sad to see how far left progressives are so gullible they actually believe Warren or Sanders would be able to keep their ridiculous, empty promises.

Even if one of those two could beat Trump (they can't) their bullshit agenda would be rendered DOA by the Republican obstructionists in the Senate. Then the moron progressives who put them in office will look as stupid and gullible as the morons on the extremist right who believed Trump's bullshit promises and put him in office.

Biden is a solid, experienced leader and HE is the one who lives in the real world, not Bernie or Lizzy. Ergo, he doesn't need gimmicks and phony, empty promises about free everything for everybody that only gullible fools believe will ever happen.

There are too many dumb people in this country on both sides who need to grow the fuck up and stop believing all these feel-good lies out of politicians who know how to push their buttons and play them for chumps.

1. Who's to say the GOP will hold the Senate?

2. What makes you think the GOP, who stonewalled Obama throughout his term with Biden as VP, will work with Biden?

3. Incremental change isn't what motivates voters; big, broad ideas are. Biden has no big, broad ideas. His entire campaign is to name-check Obama, who the GOP obstructed the entire time.

4. This isn't a BoTh SiDeS thing; most voters aren't dumb, they're disconnected and disengaged because of politicians like Biden who circle the wagons around the wealthy, hosting fundraisers, campaign stops, etc., and spend very little time with regular people. Most congresspeople and senators spend 70-90% of their time raising money. And from whom are they doing the majority of that fundraising? From the rich. So if you spend all your time around rich people, you're going to think like rich people. Biden is out of touch. Only Sanders and Warren have any clue how regular Americans are faring because they listen to them.

[Bill]

No. It's not Bernie voters who caused Trump to win; it was racist, gullible shitheels in Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin who voted for Trump.

Let's place blame where blame truly lies.

No blame for hillary??

[LV426]

No blame for hillary??

She got 3 million more votes.

[Earl]

Pocahantas, the culture thief, won’t get many votes from the Native Americans from whom Pocahantas stole their culture.

Nor from Middle Americans if the culture thief gets that far.

[crowonapost]

YALIF.

* Science isn't observations. Observations are subject to the problems of phenomenology. They are evidence only. They are not a proof. They are not a theory. Science is a set of falsifiable theories.
* Define 'climate change'. It doesn't mean anything.
* No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth using IR from the Earth's surface.
** You cannot trap heat (1st law of thermodynamics).
** You cannot trap light (Planck's law).
** You cannot create energy out of nothing (1st law of thermodynamics).
** You cannot heat a warmer surface using a colder gas (2nd law of thermodynamics).
** You cannot reduce the radiance of Earth and increase its temperature (Stefan-Boltzmann law).

You cannot just ignore these theories of science.

First you have no clue what scientific theory is. You have no understanding of science. It is a process of repeatable, verifiable gathering of factual evidence. No science is not truth it is a trajectory of fact gathering.
Finally by the dumb ass examples you gave you just proved you are an absolute idiot.
For example:

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth using IR from the Earth's surface.

WTF does that have to do with anything?

No the atmospheric gases and water vapor are heated by the suns radiation exciting the atoms. These two particular molecules have an incredible ability to slowly dissipate i.e mother fucking E. hold that vibrated excited energy before the law of thermodynamics dissipates it, they are water and CO2. When there is an imbalance of one, specifically CO2 it holds that heated energy longer and then causes other physical phenomena in the environment to get excited, see heated molecules. This shit is basic, guy. Then you add the release of methane which has the ability to hold more excited vibrating energy before dissipating you get even more.... fucking heat. This is basic chemistry. No need for a bullshit theory. The issue is the scale of these gases in the atmosphere and at that point it's just basic math, dumb ass, not magical opinion from half assed understanding of words. According to your childish theory no star could make heat because the magical 'law of thermodynamics.

Fuck you are embarrassing.

All that's going on is trying to understand the mathematical scale of this shit and it's effect on the overall planet.

** You cannot trap light (Planck's law).

And you cannot go faster than light in a vacuum,-Theory of relativity. Also known as no shit and an irrelevant point.

** You cannot create energy out of nothing (1st law of thermodynamics).

Goddamn but you are a dumb shit. No one at any point brought up anything like that. Also the energy heating the planet is from the Full spectrum electromagnetic radiation of the fucking local star called the sun. I guess according to 'Into the Stupids' Derpy understanding of 'Stience', The sun can't make heat because the FERST law of TERDOdynamics. Just, wow.

** You cannot heat a warmer surface using a colder gas (2nd law of thermodynamics).

Bahaha what the fuck are you implying? That there is some magical gas in the vacuum of space? Based on everything you've posted so far, probably.

** You cannot reduce the radiance of Earth and increase its temperature (Stefan-Boltzmann law).

WTF does that have to do with anything? I'm guessing you are trying to show' yur smart like' by just putting out random shit that has nothing to do with anything.
Go listen to your right wing think tank vomitoruium and let them stick there hand up your ass to move your mouth so you can meat puppet some more random bullshit and delude yourself into think you said something.

Because that shit was embarrassing.

[Into the Night]

First you have no clue what scientific theory is.

Science isn't a theory. It is defined using philosophy. A theory of science is a falsifiable theory. Done.

You have no understanding of science.

Science is a set of falsifiable theories. Nothing more, nothing less.

It is a process of repeatable, verifiable gathering of factual evidence.

1) Evidence is not a fact. Learn what 'fact' means.
2) Science does not use supporting evidence. Only religion does that.
3) Evidence is not a proof.
4) No theory is ever proven True, whether it's a theory of science or a non-scientific theory.

No science is not truth it is a trajectory of fact gathering.

Learn what 'fact' means. 'Fact' does not mean Universal Truth. It does not mean data. It does not mean an observation. Neither observations nor data (the result of an observation) is part of science. They are evidence only. All observations are subject to the problems of phenomenology.

Finally by the dumb ass examples you gave you just proved you are an absolute idiot.

Argument of the stone. Bulverism fallacy. Insult fallacy.

For example:

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth using IR from the Earth's surface.

WTF does that have to do with anything?

Just what it says.

No the atmospheric gases and water vapor are heated by the suns radiation exciting the atoms.

The Sun is not the surface of the Earth. Contextomy fallacy. Pay attention.

These two particular molecules have an incredible ability to slowly dissipate i.e mother fucking E. hold that vibrated excited energy

It is not possible to trap thermal energy. There is always heat.

before the law of thermodynamics dissipates it,

There is no sequence. There is always heat.

they are water and CO2.

Nothing magick about either of these materials.

When there is an imbalance of one,

Define 'balance' of CO2 and water.

specifically CO2 it holds that heated energy longer

WRONG. Both CO2 and water are just like any other material. They cannot trap thermal energy. There is always heat.

and then causes other physical phenomena in the environment to get excited, see heated molecules.

Buzzword fallacy. Heat is simply heat.

This shit is basic, guy.

No, what you are describing is shit.

Then you add the release of methane which has the ability to hold more excited vibrating energy before dissipating you get even more.... fucking heat.

* You cannot trap heat.
* You cannot trap thermal energy. There is always heat.
* You cannot trap light.
* There is no sequence.
* You cannot create energy out of nothing.

This is basic chemistry.

No, it's not chemistry at all. CO2 is still CO2, and water is still water.

No need for a bullshit theory.

The 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law are not bullshit.

The issue is the scale of these gases in the atmosphere

Scale makes no difference. Large or small scale changes NONE of these theories of science.

and at that point it's just basic math, dumb ass,

No math here, except the formalized equations resulting from the theories you are desperately trying to ignore.

not magical opinion from half assed understanding of words.

Inversion fallacy. This is YOUR problem.

According to your childish theory no star could make heat

Heat is not made. Nothing constructs heat. Heat simply exists, or it doesn't. Stars do not 'make' heat. They heat the planets in their system by radiance.

because the magical 'law of thermodynamics.

Radiance is part of the laws of thermodynamics.

Fuck you are embarrassing.

YALIF.

All that's going on is trying to understand the mathematical scale of this shit and it's effect on the overall planet.

Scale makes no difference to any law of thermodynamics or any law of Planck.

** You cannot trap light (Planck's law).

And you cannot go faster than light in a vacuum,-Theory of relativity. Also known as no shit and an irrelevant point.

Yet you are trying to describe a system that traps light. You are now in paradox.

** You cannot create energy out of nothing (1st law of thermodynamics).

Goddamn but you are a dumb shit. No one at any point brought up anything like that.[/QUOTE]
You did. You did it right here in your last post with methane.

Also the energy heating the planet is from the Full spectrum electromagnetic radiation of the fucking local star called the sun.

No. UV doesn't convert to thermal energy when absorbed. Neither does visible light. They convert to ionization or chemical reactions when absorbed. Only infrared converts to thermal energy when absorbed. Most the Sun's output is infrared.

I guess according to 'Into the Stupids' Derpy understanding of 'Stience', The sun can't make heat because the FERST law of TERDOdynamics. Just, wow.

The Sun does not make heat. Nothing makes heat. Heat simply exists, or it doesn't. Heat is the flow of the thermal energy. The Sun converts thermonuclear reactions into thermal energy, which is then converted into light and radiated away into space. Thermonuclear reactions also convert directly to light.

** You cannot heat a warmer surface using a colder gas (2nd law of thermodynamics).

Bahaha what the fuck are you implying? That there is some magical gas in the vacuum of space? Based on everything you've posted so far, probably.

No, YOU are. YOU are trying to claim CO2 in the atmosphere, which is generally colder than the surface, is capable of heating the surface. That's not possible, according to the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

** You cannot reduce the radiance of Earth and increase its temperature (Stefan-Boltzmann law).

WTF does that have to do with anything?

You are trying to trap light. Specifically, you are trying to prevent or reduce IR from leaving Earth. This reduces the radiance of Earth. You are using this to increase the temperature of Earth. That's not possible, according to the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

I'm guessing you are trying to show' yur smart like' by just putting out random shit that has nothing to do with anything.
Go listen to your right wing think tank vomitoruium and let them stick there hand up your ass to move your mouth so you can meat puppet some more random bullshit and delude yourself into think you said something.

Because that shit was embarrassing.

You guessed wrong!

[Bill]

She got 3 million more votes.

I/everyone is aware of that.......

She didn't have enough in those key states.

& I asked you do you think she played a part in that..

You are not required to reply......

[LV426]

I/everyone is aware of that.......

She didn't have enough in those key states.

& I asked you do you think she played a part in that..

You are not required to reply......

No, I don't think she played a part in it. I think Russian trolls managed to dupe enough people with propaganda that they voted for Trump or a 3rd Party in margins that made it possible for them to change the vote totals without anyone noticing.

[Gonzomin]

I am in Michigan. The amount of money Trump spent here is stunning. Trump ads ran all day long on every channel. Trump and the Reds have forced voter suppression across the land. It is harder to win for the left. However, Hillary lost Michigan by a vote per precinct. It was an extremely narrow victory. I would not chalk it up for Trump so easily.