Lewandowski Makes Dunce-o-crats Look Like the Idiots They Are:Priceless!!

[CharacterAssassin]

But for there to be criminal intent there’s needs to be a *criminal* investigation.

Trump can’t be guilty of OOJ in a counterintelligence investigation. Even if he actually called it off himself. What specific crimes were alleged that Trump was supposedly trying to protect himself from being charged with?

I’ll wait here. Take your time.

He attempted, at least 10 known times, w/8 of them having all three elements necessary for OOJ, to disrupt/end a federal investigation into his campaign. Full stop. If it was CI is utterly irrelevant. He tried to obstruct justice, as the report clearly shows.

If he called it off for corrupt purposes, that would also be OOJ.;

You're in way over your head again, silly girl.

[CharacterAssassin]

But at the time of the alleged asking-to-reign-in discussion, nothing was reigned in; additionally, there was no underlying crime in the investigation.

At any rate, at the time of the alleged reign-in discussion, was the investigation a criminal investigation or a counterintelligence investigation?

If it was a criminal investigation—what was the alleged crime?

Your stupidity is especially delicious today. As has been explained to you over and over again, retard, there doesn't need to be any underlying crime for it to be OOJ, as Barr himself was forced to admit under oath.

That nothing was reigned in is completely irrelevant. Only the intent and acting on that intent are necessary.

Please sober up for once in your life.

[Darth Omar]

He attempted, at least 10 known times, w/8 of them having all three elements necessary for OOJ, to disrupt/end a federal investigation into his campaign. Full stop. If it was CI is utterly irrelevant. He tried to obstruct justice, as the report clearly shows.

If he called it off for corrupt purposes, that would also be OOJ.;

You're in way over your head again, silly girl.

What specific criminal charge, *with relevant statutes*, was Trump supposedly trying to protect himself from?

Watergate this ain’t. In Watergate, an actual crime was committed. Also, Trump could easily plead that he understood it to be a counterintelligence investigation—because Comey told [lied to] Trump that he wasn’t a subject of investigation.

Comey’s lying is a real problem.

[CharacterAssassin]

What specific criminal charge, *with relevant statutes*, was Trump supposedly trying to protect himself from?

Watergate this ain’t. In Watergate, an actual crime was committed. Also, Trump could easily plead that he understood it to be a counterintelligence investigation—because Comey told [lied to] Trump that he wasn’t a subject of investigation.

Comey’s lying is a real problem.

Wow. You really ARE that stupid. He was trying to protect himself and his campaign from a legal federal investigation into that campaign and he did so by obstructing justice. This is FAR worse than Watergate ever could have been.

The real problem here is your stupidity.

[Earl]

The federal investigation was precipitated by an illegal FISA Warrant paid for by Hillary's DNC and was perpetrated on a political opponent.

There is the crime, using the awesome power of the FBI to illegally spy on a political opponent.,

[Darth Omar]

Wow. You really ARE that stupid. He was trying to protect himself and his campaign from a legal federal investigation into that campaign and he did so by obstructing justice. This is FAR worse than Watergate ever could have been.

The real problem here is your stupidity.

No lol.

Watergate is dated. A better and more recent example of obstruction with criminal intent was when Hillary destroyed evidence that was under subpoena during the *criminal* investigation involving her mishandling of classified information. Mishandling classified information is a specific crime involving specific federal statutes.

Do you even have a specific statute you can lay on Trump that Mullet was investigating in his ‘criminal’ investigation of the Trump campaign?

[Truth Detector]

You can't really call people idiots unless you're above that level.

True; so don't you EVER call anyone and idiot, idiot.

[CharacterAssassin]

No lol.

Watergate is dated. A better and more recent example of obstruction with criminal intent was when Hillary destroyed evidence that was under subpoena during the *criminal* investigation involving her mishandling of classified information. Mishandling classified information is a specific crime involving specific federal statutes.

Do you even have a specific statute you can lay on Trump that Mullet was investigating in his ‘criminal’ investigation of the Trump campaign?

Utterly irrelevant, yet again, to the fact that he tried to obstruct justice, which is in and of itself a federal felony.

Again: the problem here is your stupidity.

[NiftyNiblick]

Corey Lewandowski is representative of the most cretinous reprobates in this country.

He'd got a face that's made for punching, and living in the Blue Northeast, that must be a real problem for him.

They'd put his ass in jail for contempt of Congress except that AG Barr is the one who'd have to prosecute that case, and that piece of shit is as bad as Lewandowski

Hopefully, the two of them will be in Leavenworth Federal Prison throughout the Liz Warren administration.

[Truth Detector]

He looked like a lemming and criminal henchman involved in Trump's coverup. More justification to continue investigation.

STFU you lying hack.

[Earl]

There was no crime to obstruct.

There was an attempted coup by Comey et al.

[gfm7175]

I don't defend Trump so much because I'm enthralled with him. Sometimes I hate him, sometimes I love the guy.
But dims have been acting like petulant children since Nov. 2016 and they still do.
Which is why I've already decided I'll vote for him in '20. Which I did not do in '16.

Glad to hear it, good sir!

For me, it's not even about who I support anymore, to be honest. It is purely always going to be a vote AGAINST the sickness of Democrat Marxism and their want to ban everything of which they do not like (ie, guns and meat and plastic straws and etc.) I don't want those twits controlling every aspect of my life.

I, with luke-warm support at best, voted for Trump in '16 (mostly because I despised Clinton)... but believe me, I am MORE than eager to vote for Trump (well, against Democrat Marxists) in '20...

There are some things that I love about the guy; there are some things that completely irritate me about the guy... But the FUCK am I going to vote for anything other than Republican at this point, since that is how one votes AGAINST Democrat Marxism and their dangerous "banneroid complex"...

[Truth Detector]

The day of reckoning is coming next November. It's going to be a bloodbath. Hang in there, Hon Justice Ginsburg.

SAVED! You are so sure; yet do not take the bet.

[Truth Detector]

Send in the clowns...never mind, the Democrats are already here.

A total clown-show by the radical Democrat Socialists yesterday.

Yes it was; only the dumbest among us expected it to be anything more.

[Earl]

"the Liz Warren administration."

LOL