Page 7 of 9 FirstFirst ... 3456789 LastLast
Results 91 to 105 of 127

Thread: House Judiciary Committee to hold 1st impeachment hearing

  1. #91 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    That's pretty funny; you read shit and then misquote everything and bloviate buffoonish stupidity no one can comprehend.

    Incompetence isn't a crime; allowing Americans to be killed when you could have done something about it and then LYING about it is.

    Your whiny "Hannity" Glenn Beck" schtick is stale and stupid arescheese.

    Ten years? Now you have to lie about it. No shocker arsecheese; you are one of the most dishonest hacks on the forum.

    You dumb hack; Special Prosecutors don't "clear" people nor do they "exonerate" anyone. They report the evidence to the Attorney General who then make these determinations.

    Accordingly, ….. this report does not conclude that the President committed a crime…...
    Said it before, but still valid, "truthie" is always a trip

    Lets see, the first "breakdown" says nothing but does include the expected insults, three this time in one sentence

    Next he attempts to move the goalposts from "incompetence" to "lying," which even as weak as the attempt is, still doesn't get around the fact that even "lying" isn't a crime, if it was, Trump would be Leavenworth

    Issa, Chaffetz, Nunes, Jordan, Meadows, did you think they were endlessly investigation Republicans? And that doesn't even include the redundant supposed investigations in the Republican Senate, we even had "special" investigations on the same content the regular "investigations" investigated. If anyone is a "dishonest hack" it would be you not acknowledging the obvious

    And then we got billy barr as the supposed say in the matter, Trump's ass man telling America Trump isn't guilty, it is all over. Last I recall, the Attorney General, part of the Executive Branch doesn't tell the Legislative Branch what they can pursue in their oversight responsibilities, well, least not according to the Constitution

    As I said, always a laugh

  2. #92 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    114,996
    Thanks
    124,828
    Thanked 27,335 Times in 22,664 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,239 Times in 2,979 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Poor arsecheese; still stuck on pathetic. YAWN.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  3. #93 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    49,883
    Thanks
    14,463
    Thanked 32,101 Times in 21,165 Posts
    Groans
    6
    Groaned 1,307 Times in 1,235 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Said it before, but still valid, "truthie" is always a trip

    Lets see, the first "breakdown" says nothing but does include the expected insults, three this time in one sentence

    Next he attempts to move the goalposts from "incompetence" to "lying," which even as weak as the attempt is, still doesn't get around the fact that even "lying" isn't a crime, if it was, Trump would be Leavenworth

    Issa, Chaffetz, Nunes, Jordan, Meadows, did you think they were endlessly investigation Republicans? And that doesn't even include the redundant supposed investigations in the Republican Senate, we even had "special" investigations on the same content the regular "investigations" investigated. If anyone is a "dishonest hack" it would be you not acknowledging the obvious

    And then we got billy barr as the supposed say in the matter, Trump's ass man telling America Trump isn't guilty, it is all over. Last I recall, the Attorney General, part of the Executive Branch doesn't tell the Legislative Branch what they can pursue in their oversight responsibilities, well, least not according to the Constitution

    As I said, always a laugh
    This whole thing is a farce.

    There’s no way this circus will get to the Senate and democrats know it. So they do the only thing they know how to do: throw innuendo up on the wall to see it will damage Trump. They don’t even care which part sticks to the wall—just throw something/anything up there to get rid of the Bad Orange Man. They’re doing the same thing to Kavanaugh.

    Democrats deserve to be defeated in 2020—roundly defeated.
    Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017

  4. #94 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dukkha View Post
    Mueller had a chance to point to obstruction -instead he punted. Obstruction without an underlying crime isn't "obstructing" anything -considering as well Mueller ( Andrew Weissmann really) had unfettered access to WH staff and docs.
    Once again, the House isn't litigating, they are investigating as part of their Congressional oversight responsibilities, they don't need an established crime to do such.

    What was the established crime in Solyndra, Fast & Furious, alleged IRS bias, Benghazi, the Affordable Care Act website? And in some cases, those investigations were followed up with another investigation into the exact same thing, BenghaziGate alone had eight separate investigations. Lot of investigating without an established crime

    Mueller's investigation didn't vindicate Trump on obstruction, leaving the door open for continual examination thru the proper Congressional means, which most say was Mueller's intention

  5. #95 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    671
    Thanks
    283
    Thanked 398 Times in 284 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 16 Times in 16 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    This whole thing is a farce.

    There’s no way this circus will get to the Senate and democrats know it. So they do the only thing they know how to do: throw innuendo up on the wall to see it will damage Trump. They don’t even care which part sticks to the wall—just throw something/anything up there to get rid of the Bad Orange Man. They’re doing the same thing to Kavanaugh.

    Democrats deserve to be defeated in 2020—roundly defeated.
    They will ensure it happens themselves. They are doing it now.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to deadcatbounce For This Post:

    Darth Omar (09-17-2019)

  7. #96 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    Poor arsecheese; still stuck on pathetic.
    "truthie" is done, when the corny copy and pastes arrive he's finished, no more content to offer in rebuttal, the usual

  8. #97 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Darth Omar View Post
    This whole thing is a farce.

    There’s no way this circus will get to the Senate and democrats know it. So they do the only thing they know how to do: throw innuendo up on the wall to see it will damage Trump. They don’t even care which part sticks to the wall—just throw something/anything up there to get rid of the Bad Orange Man. They’re doing the same thing to Kavanaugh.

    Democrats deserve to be defeated in 2020—roundly defeated.
    Again, what in the hell do you think Issa, Chaffetz, Nunes, Jordan, Goudy and Meadows had been doing for the past decade or so? The precedent was set a decade ago, so condemning such now would be hypocrisy, especially since the Democrats haven't even been in office a year yet

    And they do have reason, as I've said, Mueller's investigation didn't vindicate Trump on obstruction, he made a point of stating such, they are exercising their oversight duties of the Legislative Branch by pursuing the possibility, isn't that what they are suppose to do via the Constitution regarding the Executive Branch?

  9. #98 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deadcatbounce View Post
    They will ensure it happens themselves. They are doing it now.
    Thanks Sean

  10. #99 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    671
    Thanks
    283
    Thanked 398 Times in 284 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 16 Times in 16 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Thanks Sean
    No problem Nancy.

  11. #100 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    41,961
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 22,041 Times in 13,848 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 3,042 Times in 2,838 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by deadcatbounce View Post
    No problem Nancy.
    That's not even witty, let alone original

  12. #101 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    671
    Thanks
    283
    Thanked 398 Times in 284 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 16 Times in 16 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    That's not even witty, let alone original
    Just accurate. Nancy.

  13. #102 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,055
    Thanks
    2,436
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 6,202 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 493 Times in 469 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by archives View Post
    Nor according to Jerry Nadler
    So? Who cares what that fat fuck piece of shit says? They don't have the votes to start an official impeachment inquiry. Can you show me where the Constitution authorizes a house judiciary committee to harass the President? Of course you can't, because no such authority exists.
    Every life matters

  14. #103 | Top
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    73,391
    Thanks
    101,921
    Thanked 54,770 Times in 33,632 Posts
    Groans
    3,155
    Groaned 5,065 Times in 4,683 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by countryboy View Post
    So? Who cares what that fat fuck piece of shit says? They don't have the votes to start an official impeachment inquiry. Can you show me where the Constitution authorizes a house judiciary committee to harass the President? Of course you can't, because no such authority exists.
    It isn’t harassment, it’s truth seeking, Alice.

  15. #104 | Top
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Posts
    671
    Thanks
    283
    Thanked 398 Times in 284 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 16 Times in 16 Posts

    Default

    I think this is amusing.

    "Nadler has a liberal voting record in the House. He gained national prominence during the impeachment of Bill Clinton, when he described the process as a "partisan railroad job."

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Nadler

  16. #105 | Top
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Posts
    14,055
    Thanks
    2,436
    Thanked 8,812 Times in 6,202 Posts
    Groans
    568
    Groaned 493 Times in 469 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    It isn’t harassment, it’s truth seeking, Alice.
    Its harrassment, and lawless.
    Every life matters

Similar Threads

  1. House Judiciary panel preparing vote to define Trump impeachment probe
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-07-2019, 12:44 PM
  2. HOUSE JUDICIARY CHAIR CALLS ON MUELLER TO TESTIFY BEFORE COMMITTEE
    By reagansghost in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-08-2019, 03:04 PM
  3. Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-16-2018, 02:57 PM
  4. Watching the House Judiciary Committee questioning Rosentein,
    By archives in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 12-13-2017, 02:09 PM
  5. IMPEACHMENT to be heard in Judiciary Committee Friday.
    By ib1yysguy in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-23-2008, 01:06 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •