Said it before, but still valid, "truthie" is always a trip
Lets see, the first "breakdown" says nothing but does include the expected insults, three this time in one sentence
Next he attempts to move the goalposts from "incompetence" to "lying," which even as weak as the attempt is, still doesn't get around the fact that even "lying" isn't a crime, if it was, Trump would be Leavenworth
Issa, Chaffetz, Nunes, Jordan, Meadows, did you think they were endlessly investigation Republicans? And that doesn't even include the redundant supposed investigations in the Republican Senate, we even had "special" investigations on the same content the regular "investigations" investigated. If anyone is a "dishonest hack" it would be you not acknowledging the obvious
And then we got billy barr as the supposed say in the matter, Trump's ass man telling America Trump isn't guilty, it is all over. Last I recall, the Attorney General, part of the Executive Branch doesn't tell the Legislative Branch what they can pursue in their oversight responsibilities, well, least not according to the Constitution
As I said, always a laugh
"When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."
A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
Author: Booker T. Washington
This whole thing is a farce.
There’s no way this circus will get to the Senate and democrats know it. So they do the only thing they know how to do: throw innuendo up on the wall to see it will damage Trump. They don’t even care which part sticks to the wall—just throw something/anything up there to get rid of the Bad Orange Man. They’re doing the same thing to Kavanaugh.
Democrats deserve to be defeated in 2020—roundly defeated.
Coup has started. First of many steps. Impeachment will follow ultimately~WB attorney Mark Zaid, January 2017
Once again, the House isn't litigating, they are investigating as part of their Congressional oversight responsibilities, they don't need an established crime to do such.
What was the established crime in Solyndra, Fast & Furious, alleged IRS bias, Benghazi, the Affordable Care Act website? And in some cases, those investigations were followed up with another investigation into the exact same thing, BenghaziGate alone had eight separate investigations. Lot of investigating without an established crime
Mueller's investigation didn't vindicate Trump on obstruction, leaving the door open for continual examination thru the proper Congressional means, which most say was Mueller's intention
Darth Omar (09-17-2019)
Again, what in the hell do you think Issa, Chaffetz, Nunes, Jordan, Goudy and Meadows had been doing for the past decade or so? The precedent was set a decade ago, so condemning such now would be hypocrisy, especially since the Democrats haven't even been in office a year yet
And they do have reason, as I've said, Mueller's investigation didn't vindicate Trump on obstruction, he made a point of stating such, they are exercising their oversight duties of the Legislative Branch by pursuing the possibility, isn't that what they are suppose to do via the Constitution regarding the Executive Branch?
So? Who cares what that fat fuck piece of shit says? They don't have the votes to start an official impeachment inquiry. Can you show me where the Constitution authorizes a house judiciary committee to harass the President? Of course you can't, because no such authority exists.
Every life matters
I think this is amusing.
"Nadler has a liberal voting record in the House. He gained national prominence during the impeachment of Bill Clinton, when he described the process as a "partisan railroad job."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerry_Nadler
Bookmarks