New York Times criticized from both sides of aisle over Kavanaugh story

[deadcatbounce]

I know, let's all read Breitbarf and watch Fox!

Why would you not want to know that a newspaper you are reading is accurate? Did you see how many Democrats called for Kavanaughs impeachment based on what the New York Times wrote? All a lie.

[reagansghost]

Why would you not want to know that a newspaper you are reading is accurate? Did you see how many Democrats called for Kavanaughs impeachment based on what the New York Times wrote? All a lie.

It is generally accurate, no publication is 100%

what falsehood are you referring to?

[deadcatbounce]

It is generally accurate, no publication is 100%

what falsehood are you referring to?

Where do you see accuracy?

[reagansghost]

Where do you see accuracy?

how childish, done with this thread fail

ciao

[deadcatbounce]

how childish, done with this thread fail

ciao

Looks like you do not see it either. So why comment on it if you know you are wrong.

[archives]

And he uses the "Federalist" as an source

The story was a review of the recent book on the investigations, the NYT caught heat because it reproduced segments of the book in the article which were questionable. That and a tweet someone sent out, you know, like the bogus tweets Trump issues attacking someone. They apologized for the tweet and explained the unintentional framing of the review

What really is hysterical regarding the NYT and WP is that the probability of any right winger having actually read it is remote at best. Other than an article or two they saw on the Internet, the only thing they know about the NYT and believe is what their demogogues tell them. When was the last time you ever even bought a copy and read the paper? I'd wager, never

The NYT includes columnists as Wills, Stephens, Douthat, Brooks, Dowd, and Krauthammer before he died. It was the NYT that broke the story on Hillary's Emails and her server. Daily they run content covering the US and the world that most news vehicles especially TV never cover. No melodrama, no just "all the news that is fit to print"

And the biggest irony is that Trump can't shake his NYT obsession, he sought its approval all while living in New York and it was one of the first vehicles he turned to for an interview when he was elected. In addition, everytime he criticizes it, it gets a bump in circulation

[deadcatbounce]

And he uses the "Federalist" as an source

The story was a review of the recent book on the investigations, the NYT caught heat because it reproduced segments of the book in the article which were questionable. That and a tweet someone sent out, you know, like the bogus tweets Trump issues attacking someone. They apologized for the tweet and explained the unintentional framing of the review

What really is hysterical regarding the NYT and WP is that the probability of any right winger having actually read it is remote at best. Other than an article or two they saw on the Internet, the only thing they know about the NYT and believe is what their demogogues tell them. When was the last time you ever even bought a copy and read the paper? I'd wager, never

The NYT includes columnists as Wills, Stephens, Douthat, Brooks, Dowd, and Krauthammer before he died. It was the NYT that broke the story on Hillary's Emails and her server. Daily they run content covering the US and the world that most news vehicles especially TV never cover. No melodrama, no just "all the news that is fit to print"

And the biggest irony is that Trump can't shake his NYT obsession, he sought its approval all while living in New York and it was one of the first vehicles he turned to for an interview when he was elected. In addition, everytime he criticizes it, it gets a bump in circulation

So you are saying the story that the New York Times posted falsely accusing Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct is true. Even though the New York Times had to recant it because it is false. And people on the right are not smart enough to believe the first story. Ok.

[dukkha]

A once well respected newspaper reduced to rubble.

The New York Times used to be called the Gray Lady of American newspapers. The sobriquet implied a certain stateliness, a sense of responsibility, the possession of high virtue.
https://ask.metafilter.com/207313/Wh...-The-Gray-Lady

just more fake news now

[dukkha]

And he uses the "Federalist" as an source

The story was a review of the recent book on the investigations, the NYT caught heat because it reproduced segments of the book in the article which were questionable. That and a tweet someone sent out, you know, like the bogus tweets Trump issues attacking someone. They apologized for the tweet and explained the unintentional framing of the review

What really is hysterical regarding the NYT and WP is that the probability of any right winger having actually read it is remote at best. Other than an article or two they saw on the Internet, the only thing they know about the NYT and believe is what their demogogues tell them. When was the last time you ever even bought a copy and read the paper? I'd wager, never

The NYT includes columnists as Wills, Stephens, Douthat, Brooks, Dowd, and Krauthammer before he died. It was the NYT that broke the story on Hillary's Emails and her server. Daily they run content covering the US and the world that most news vehicles especially TV never cover. No melodrama, no just "all the news that is fit to print"

And the biggest irony is that Trump can't shake his NYT obsession, he sought its approval all while living in New York and it was one of the first vehicles he turned to for an interview when he was elected. In addition, everytime he criticizes it, it gets a bump in circulation

it OMITTED KEY PARTS RIGHT IN THE BOOK
How is this anything but lies of omission -the full background was LITERALLY RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEIR EYES

[dukkha]

how childish, done with this thread fail

ciao

one less troll

[ziggy]

[anonymoose]

It is generally accurate, no publication is 100%

what falsehood are you referring to?

The New York Times controversies
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ne...acking_Program

There've been many since at least 1999.

[Micawber]

Chairman of the bored^^^^

[Micawber]

I want to hear the scream of the butterfly

[Truth Detector]

so the fuck what?

You like liars don't you? Moron.