Again, they are not changing the Constitution, don't know why you keep repeating that lie, rather interpreting it, they are not changing anything
And to make it even more relevant, show us verbatim where in the Second Amendment, the actual words, that anyone in America can own any kind of weapon they want without any restrictions.
Even the gun manufacturers advertising you are regurgitating is their interpretation on what the Amendmemt says, fortunately the definative interpretation is that of the Supreme Court, and they have ruled guns can be regulated
Into the Night (09-16-2019)
You are arguing a change in the Constitution by the Supreme Court. They do not have that authority.
There is no clause that specifies a weapon by type of brand. Nothing in Article I specifies a weapon by type or brand either.
The Supreme Court does not have authority to change the constitution.
nolongertolerant (09-16-2019)
The 2nd Amendment makes no mention of "mental illness". Who gets to determine who is "mentally fit" to own a gun? Why do they get such power over people?
You don't get to decide which guns people can and can't have. See the 2nd Amendment.
No. YOU are warping the 2nd Amendment.
Okay.
You don't get to determine what another person "needs" or "doesn't need".
What is a weapon "outside the guise of civilian grade"?
Fine with me.
Irrelevant.
Define "dangerous war arms".
People should be able to keep and bear ALL arms. Read the 2nd Amendment.
To be fair, Jane wasn't asserting that mental illness didn't exist back in the day, but rather, she was asserting that we have more understanding of mental illness now than we did back in the day.
I have no idea what she was trying to say there... In any event, it is a rejection of the 2nd Amendment.
Agreed.
Correct. She has little understanding about firearms. She just wants to punish all law-abiding citizens for what some criminals did.
Bigdog (09-16-2019)
Bookmarks