Biden's strong performance at third Dem debate

[Granule]

Biden is a closeted republican said this from day one President Obama picked him. He had to pick a racist to make white America feel safe.

Biden is all yours, fuckface. And do you know how we know he's all yours? Because he's a pervert and he's a racist.

[Truth Detector]

Where does it say in the Constitution Americans have the "right" to a semiautomatic weapon? Can they possess a fully functional tank under the same logic?

Any and every right in the Constitution can be legally regulated, none are absolute, never have been, never will be, if they were we would descend into anarchy

Where does the Constitution distinguish the types of weapons? Listen you low IQ snowflake; if you don't like the Constitution, change it. Good luck.

[Truth Detector]

Where does it say Democrats despise anyone? An array of conservatives say they dislike the coastal States, the urban centers, the educated, etc.,etc., does that mean they despise them?

It's hard to take your lie filled bullshit seriously arsecheese. The left has been despising the right for decades now. Every time the left doesn't win an election they impugn everyone who doesn't think like them. You are a bunch of Fascistic morons who think being wards of the state will make your pitiful pathetic lives better.

[Truth Detector]

They don't want to get it. It is math. It is simple math.

I will reiterate, for the umpteenth time. If society makes the decision, no money, no insurance then NO MEDICAL CARE, then state it and codify it. Doctors, hospitals, providers, states, counties will be held harmless. Make it date certain with plenty of notice and get notify everyone up and down the healthcare channels. If you can't afford care, it's no one else's RESPONSIBILITY. Do not show up at any service providers doors. You won't be treated.

It must be made LEGAL not to TREAT!

Republicans could start processes and legislation YESTERDAY. And everyone of them knows it.

Absurdity; a sure sign of the last desperate refuge for liars, fools and ignorance; and those who have lost their arguments. Yay you!

[Truth Detector]

Rich people can pay for healthcare with couch change. The cost is no problem for them. It cripples the rest of us.

How does the fact that rich people have more affect those who have less? Are they preventing them from getting an education? Inventing something? Creating something? Getting a good paying job? What?

[Gonzomin]

The debates will still be lacking as long as that many people are involved, The next will have a couple more. It will likely be on 2 days. Steyer qualified and Gabbard is closing in.
Trump has 2 competitors and he will not debate them. He will tweet insults instead.

[archives]

Where does the Constitution distinguish the types of weapons? Listen you low IQ snowflake; if you don't like the Constitution, change it. Good luck.

Hey pal, it was your buddy's arguement, tell him, and by the way, even your icon Scalia warned of interpreting the Amendment in absolute terms, if you are going to exchange on the topic at least understand the topic

[archives]

It's hard to take your lie filled bullshit seriously arsecheese. The left has been despising the right for decades now. Every time the left doesn't win an election they impugn everyone who doesn't think like them. You are a bunch of Fascistic morons who think being wards of the state will make your pitiful pathetic lives better.

Another "truthie" post full of the predictable adolescent insults that says absolutely nothing, well, nothing anyone couldn't hear by turning on the radio

Boring

[archives]

How does the fact that rich people have more affect those who have less? Are they preventing them from getting an education? Inventing something? Creating something? Getting a good paying job? What?

Guess you never learned in high school that economics is the study of scarcity

[Gonzomin]

Biden is all yours, fuckface. And do you know how we know he's all yours? Because he's a pervert and he's a racist.

Just like trump. what a race that would be. Of course, Biden is not a pervert but Daffy is whore monger who has no respect for his marriage vows.

[Truth Detector]

Where does the Constitution distinguish the types of weapons? Listen you low IQ snowflake; if you don't like the Constitution, change it. Good luck.

Hey pal, it was your buddy's arguement, tell him,

No, PAL, it was yours. Answer the fucking question you lying dishonest hack.

Where does it say in the Constitution Americans have the "right" to a semiautomatic weapon?

and by the way, even your icon Scalia

Again, can you ever post with lying or bloviating strawmen?

..warned of interpreting the Amendment in absolute terms, if you are going to exchange on the topic at least understand the topic

LINK to Scalia's statement please. Your the fools making the idiots absolutist arguments about tanks and artillery you lying buffoon.

[Gonzomin]

Biden did not shine last night, but he also did not fuck up. Running against Trump that is a huge positive, Trump is senile and suffering dementia.

[Truth Detector]

Another "truthie" post full of the predictable adolescent insults that says absolutely nothing, well, nothing anyone couldn't hear by turning on the radio

Boring

Another "arsecheese" post full of the predictable flailing, deflecting, crying and lying that says absolutely nothing. Well; nothing anyone couldn't hear by turning on CNN.

Boring.

[archives]

No, PAL, it was yours. Answer the fucking question you lying dishonest hack.

Where does it say in the Constitution Americans have the "right" to a semiautomatic weapon?

Again, can you ever post with lying or bloviating strawmen?

LINK to Scalia's statement please. Your the fools making the idiots absolutist arguments about tanks and artillery you lying buffoon.

Ah, second time, it was our pal's point, not mine, I was pointing out the idiocy of the arguement

Pages #53-55 of the Heller majority decision authored by Scalia;

“Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited…”. It is “…not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.”

“Nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”

“We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller (an earlier case) said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those “in common use at the time”. "We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of ‘dangerous and unusual weapons."

As I said, try to keep up

[archives]

Another "arsecheese" post full of the predictable flailing, deflecting, crying and lying that says absolutely nothing. Well; nothing anyone couldn't hear by turning on CNN.

Boring.

And now "truthie" can't even get original, guess he does needs those adolescent personal attacks to fill a post