On 9/11, NYT Blames Airplanes For Taking Down WTC

[volsrock]

In an article published on the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks, The New York Times decided to blame airplanes for taking down the World Trade Center, completely ignoring that it was terrorists who hijacked those planes.

“Eighteen years have passed since airplanes took aim at the World Trade Center and brought them down,” reads the second paragraph in the piece titled “Remembering Those Lost 18 Years Ago on 9/11.” In fact, terrorism isn’t even mentioned in the article, except for in the subheading.


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahba...n-wtc-n2552901


airplanes took aim


Anything to avoid using the word Muslim or Islam

[Celticguy]

SMH

[Jack]

In an article published on the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks, The New York Times decided to blame airplanes for taking down the World Trade Center, completely ignoring that it was terrorists who hijacked those planes.

“Eighteen years have passed since airplanes took aim at the World Trade Center and brought them down,” reads the second paragraph in the piece titled “Remembering Those Lost 18 Years Ago on 9/11.” In fact, terrorism isn’t even mentioned in the article, except for in the subheading.


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahba...n-wtc-n2552901


airplanes took aim


Anything to avoid using the word Muslim or Islam

How about using the word 'Saudi'.

[Darth Omar]

Surprised they didn’t wring a race angle out of it.

[Earl]

Radical Islamist terrorists...

[volsrock]

How about using the word 'Saudi'.

Do they use the word American when a white commits a mass shooting? Or New Zealander in the shooting there?

[domer76]

In an article published on the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks, The New York Times decided to blame airplanes for taking down the World Trade Center, completely ignoring that it was terrorists who hijacked those planes.

“Eighteen years have passed since airplanes took aim at the World Trade Center and brought them down,” reads the second paragraph in the piece titled “Remembering Those Lost 18 Years Ago on 9/11.” In fact, terrorism isn’t even mentioned in the article, except for in the subheading.


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahba...n-wtc-n2552901


airplanes took aim


Anything to avoid using the word Muslim or Islam

Naw, it was your god. Jerry Falwell said so.

In retaliation for us libs supporting fags.

[USFREEDOM911]

How about using the word 'Saudi'.

.

[Jack]

Do they use the word American when a white commits a mass shooting? Or New Zealander in the shooting there?

"The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and subsequent discussions of
religious extremism have called attention to Islamic puritanical movements known as
Wahhabism and Salafiyya. Al Qaeda leaders and their ideological supporters have
advocated a violent message that some suggest is rooted in these conservative Islamic
traditions. Other observers have accused Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Wahhabism,
of having disseminated religious ideology that promotes hatred and violence, targeting
the United States and its allies."
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS21695.pdf

[Gonzomin]

In an article published on the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks, The New York Times decided to blame airplanes for taking down the World Trade Center, completely ignoring that it was terrorists who hijacked those planes.

“Eighteen years have passed since airplanes took aim at the World Trade Center and brought them down,” reads the second paragraph in the piece titled “Remembering Those Lost 18 Years Ago on 9/11.” In fact, terrorism isn’t even mentioned in the article, except for in the subheading.


https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahba...n-wtc-n2552901


airplanes took aim


Anything to avoid using the word Muslim or Islam

Airplanes took down the towers. Is that is dispute?

[Wolverine]

Airplanes took down the towers. Is that is dispute?

You should take some advice, better to not type a response, and let people think you are stupid, than to type and remove all doubt!

[Gonzomin]

You should take some advice, better to not type a response, and let people think you are stupid, than to type and remove all doubt!

Let's make it easy for you. The 19 highjackers would not have taken the towers down running into them. It required an airplane. Actually 2 of them. It is not wrong to say airplanes took the towers down.

[volsrock]

Airplanes took down the towers. Is that is dispute?

Did the plane "TAKE" aim?

Did a CAR take out Heather Heyer the Charlottesville victim? Or did a white supremacist?


So we need a new head line

"Two years have passed since a car took aim at Heather Heyer and ran her over causing her death"

And do not mention white supremacist in the story!

[USFREEDOM911]

"The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and subsequent discussions of
religious extremism have called attention to Islamic puritanical movements known as
Wahhabism and Salafiyya. Al Qaeda leaders and their ideological supporters have
advocated a violent message that some suggest is rooted in these conservative Islamic
traditions. Other observers have accused Saudi Arabia, the birthplace of Wahhabism,
of having disseminated religious ideology that promotes hatred and violence, targeting
the United States and its allies."
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RS21695.pdf

.

[Wolverine]

Did the plane "TAKE" aim?

Did a CAR take out Heather Heyer the Charlottesville victim? Or did a white supremacist?


So we need a new head line

"Two years have passed since a car took aim at Heather Heyer and ran her over causing her death"

And do not mention white supremacist in the story!

He is an apologist for the left, it's really easy to see, maybe a payed hack.