Wrong.
I provide more.
I am an Atlanta resident, and as such, pay an extra $500 so the rest of the state can live comfortably.
The Atlanta metro area pays 51% of the taxes, but only receives 35% of the spending.
So what does that mean, genius?
Members banned from this thread: Cypress, evince, Rune, moon, Mason Michaels and reagansghost |
Do you think roads just magically appear?
Do you think poor, rural areas generate enough revenue to pay for them?
Here's a study from Georgia State, done in 2009, showing that the funding for rural areas comes from urban areas.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Wrong.
I provide more.
I am an Atlanta resident, and as such, pay an extra $500 so the rest of the state can live comfortably.
The Atlanta metro area pays 51% of the taxes, but only receives 35% of the spending.
So what does that mean, genius?
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
None of which would be possible without the infrastructure that is paid by the urban dwellers of your state.
In my state, the Atlanta metro area pays 51% of the taxes, but only gets 35% of the spending.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Fuck you, lazy asshole.
I pay an extra $500 in taxes so the inbred, rural bumpkins of my state can have the privilege to live in their pockets of seclusion.
Atlanta metro taxpayers pay 51% of the taxes in the state, but only receive 35% of state spending back. So where's all the rest of the tax revenue going?
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Earl (09-20-2019)
Earl (09-20-2019)
Earl (09-20-2019)
How so?
I linked to you the study from Georgia State that shows how much Atlanta residents pay vs. what they get back; that's applicable to pretty much every state, red and blue...urban areas simply have more people, generate more wealth, and pay more taxes than their rural trash counterparts.
When I die, turn me into a brick and use me to cave in the skull of a fascist
Earl (09-20-2019)
I never argued that tax cuts raise or lower revenue. I said revenue increased in FY2018 and FY 2019. That was simply to refute your argument suggesting tax cuts never raise revenue.
If I think taxes are too high I think they should be cut even if it does reduce revenue. As I said before that you ignore, I did not favor the 2017 tax cuts without cutting spending an equal amount.
Is that the reason you would not admit you were totally wrong when you claimed a person cannot be prosecuted for assaulting or killing a Nazi (standing peacefully) because he is an "inherent threat" even after I showed you constitutional law and court cases that proved you didn't know what you were talking about?
No, you just dropped the topic.
Or, after I said there were about 8 million people who voted for Obama in 2012 who voted for Trump in 2016? You gave us a bunch of math claiming that was not true because that would not account for several million votes. I showed you 7 million voted for 3rd party candidates and you dropped the topic.
You issue insults with your charges of "sophist," "bad faith," or "entitled" (never used appropriately) while engaging in the same hypocritical cherry picked crap this is never an argument against the point being made but diverting to other issues or challenging trivia or arguing against things nobody ever said.
Bookmarks