Flynn Hearing Reveals Existence of Bombshell DOJ Memo Exonerating Michael Flynn

[anatta]

A bombshell revelation was barely noticed at National Security Advisor Michael Flynn’s hearing Tuesday, when his counsel revealed in court the existence of a Justice Department memo from Jan. 30, 2017 exonerating Flynn of any collusion with Russia.
The memo, which has still not been made available to Flynn’s attorney Sidney Powell, is part of a litany of Brady material she is demanding from prosecutors.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan presided over the hearing Tuesday and set a tentative Dec. 18 sentencing date. He told the prosecution and defense that the sentencing date could be moved depending on the outcome of requests for Brady material requested by Powell and how the case will unfold in the upcoming months. Sullivan also noted during the hearing that the Brady order takes precedence over the plea agreement.

Powell will likely seek to have case dismissed for ‘egregious’ prosecutorial misconduct and withholding of exculpatory material.

“Judge Sullivan is obviously taking the Brady issues very seriously and clearly told the prosecutors that his Brady order stands regardless of the plea agreement or the plea,” Powell told SaraACarter.com. “If the prosecutors here were seeking justice instead of a conviction, General Flynn would not have been prosecuted. They have been hiding evidence that he was exonerated in early 2017.”

Government Misconduct

Powell noted the extraordinary misconduct of the government during the hearing.
She also said that Flynn would have never pleaded guilty if the government had disclosed the Brady materials before the original trial that she is now demanding. There would not have been a plea if the prosecutors had met their Brady obligations, Powell argued before the court.

Powell’s discovery of the memo shatters not only the narrative that was pushed by former Obama Administration officials regarding Flynn but also the ongoing narrative that President Donald Trump’s concern over Flynn’s prosecution amounted to alleged obstruction.

The January, 2017 timeline of the DOJ memo is extremely significant. Former FBI Director James Comey said in previous interviews that he leaked his memos through a friend to be published in the New York Times with the hope of getting a special counsel appointed to investigate Trump for obstruction. In late August, Inspector General Michael Horowitz released his much anticipated report on Comey. It was scathing and revealed that he violated FBI policy when he leaked his memos that described his private conversations with Trump. However, the DOJ declined to prosecute Comey on Horowitz’s referral.

But the existence of such a memo calls into question Comey’s actions both when he met with Trump privately and when he wrote his personal memos recanting the meetings.
If the Jan. 30, 2017 DOJ Flynn memo does exonerate Flynn, then it will call into question Comey’s actions when he had the private meetings with Trump. Why didn’t Comey reveal to Trump that DOJ found no evidence that Flynn was an ‘agent of Russia’ when he met Trump at the White House on Feb. 14 meeting? Why were the stories about Flynn, along with classified information regarding his phone conversations with the former Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, leaked to the Washington Post in January, with a followup in early February? Remember, the information was leaked by senior government officials, according to the author and columnist David Ignatius. Ignatius said that senior officials accused Flynn of violating the Logan Act, even worse conspiring with Russia.

Further, new information that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe advised that there was no Logan Act violation, along with the DOJ internal memo of Jan. 30 that Flynn ‘was not an agent of Russia,’ was enough information for Comey to advise the President that Flynn had been cleared of any wrongdoing. Instead, Comey claimed obstruction of justice by the President.

[anatta]

Comey’s Memos Vs DOJ Jan. 2017 Flynn Memo

Comey said in one of his most significant memos chronicling his Feb. 14, 2017 meeting at the Oval Office with Trump, which was the day after Trump had fired Flynn, that Trump asked everyone but Comey to leave the room, and told him he wanted to “talk about Mike Flynn.”
Flynn was fired at the time over controversy that arose from a classified information leaked to the Washington Post regarding his conversations by phone in December, 2016 with former Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The story stated that Flynn had discussed the sanctions with Kislyak. However, Comey later admitted that the FBI agents he sent to interview Flynn didn’t believe he was lying about his conversation with the former ambassador.

According to Comey’s memo Trump said: “I hope you can see your way clear to letting this go, to letting Flynn go. He is a good guy. I hope you can let this go.”

Comey suggested that Trump’s request was inappropriate, accusing him of obstructing justice by asking him to drop Flynn’s case. He used this as a pretense to leak his memos and put the nation through more than two years of Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel, which in the end found no evidence of a conspiracy with Russia. As for obstruction, Attorney General William Barr and then Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein concluded that there was no obstruction based on the evidence gathered by Mueller’s team.

However, if Comey would have advised Trump of the Jan. 30 memo it would have cleared up any unfounded lies that Flynn had in any way colluded or conspired with Russia.

If and when this memo is made public, the ongoing narrative continuing to be pushed by those former Obama officials, as well as, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff who continues to push for hearings on obstruction will be squashed.

It looks like Comey, who would have been fully aware of this memo, has a lot of explaining to do.
https://saraacarter.com/flynn-hearin...michael-flynn/

[Grokmaster]

Which would surprise no sentient being, at this point....

[anatta]

Brady violation = Brady doctrine is a pretrial discovery rule that was established by the United States Supreme Court in Brady v. Maryland (1963). The rule requires that the prosecution must turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defendant in a criminal case. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that might exonerate the defendant.

[NiftyNiblick]

Where do these right wing troglodytes come up with this shit?
I hate to say it, but when the left finally assumes control of the government, hopefully very soon, it's time for a serious Stalinesque purge. We can't be living with nutjobs like this. We'll ALL go crazy.

[Grokmaster]

Brady violation = Brady doctrine is a pretrial discovery rule that was established by the United States Supreme Court in Brady v. Maryland (1963). The rule requires that the prosecution must turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defendant in a criminal case. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that might exonerate the defendant.

The Witch Hunt Attack Dog , Andrew Weissmann, has a WELL-DOCUMENTED HISTORY OF PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT...

[anatta]

https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/s...ial-misconduct
Sidney Powell is the new Michael Flynn atty in Sullivan's court.
exposed Andrew Weissmann doing the SAME THING in the Arthur Anderson case that SCOTUS over-ruled 9-0 for
( get this) failure to provide exculpatory evidence, a well as fake indictment

( details at link)

[anatta]

Where do these right wing troglodytes come up with this shit?
I hate to say it, but when the left finally assumes control of the government, hopefully very soon, it's time for a serious Stalinesque purge. We can't be living with nutjobs like this. We'll ALL go crazy.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan presided over the hearing Tuesday and set a tentative Dec. 18 sentencing date. He told the prosecution and defense that the sentencing date could be moved depending on the outcome of requests for Brady material requested by Powell and how the case will unfold in the upcoming months. Sullivan also noted during the hearing that the Brady order takes precedence over the plea agreement.

Powell will likely seek to have case dismissed for ‘egregious’ prosecutorial misconduct and withholding of exculpatory material.

[anatta]

“If the prosecutors here were seeking justice instead of a conviction, General Flynn would not have been prosecuted. They have been hiding evidence that he was exonerated in early 2017.”

[NiftyNiblick]

Flynn wanted to help Turkey kidnap somebody in Pennsylvania for Christ's sake.
How this guy became a three star general is something that needs serious investigation.
We haven't even looked at that, yet.

The way it's going, they're going to have to let all those poor drug offenders out of prison to make room for Republican politicians and operatives.

[Stretch]

“If the prosecutors here were seeking justice instead of a conviction, General Flynn would not have been prosecuted. They have been hiding evidence that he was exonerated in early 2017.”

^THIS!
They honed in on Flynn like a wolf on its prey. Glad Flynn's case will finally be heard. He's got a good lawyer, too.

[anatta]

Flynn wanted to help Turkey kidnap somebody in Pennsylvania for Christ's sake.
How this guy became a three star general is something that needs serious investigation.
We haven't even looked at that, yet.

The way it's going, they're going to have to let all those poor drug offenders out of prison to make room for Republican politicians and operatives.

Erdogan wanted that cleric sent to Turkey -Flynn was trying to broker a deal -nothing to do with Flynn being set up /and exonerated and Comey not telling Trump he was exonerated of Russian collusion

[Stretch]

https://www.foxnews.com/transcript/s...ial-misconduct
Sidney Powell is the new Michael Flynn atty in Sullivan's court.
exposed Andrew Weissmann doing the SAME THING in the Arthur Anderson case that SCOTUS over-ruled 9-0 for
( get this) failure to provide exculpatory evidence, a well as fake indictment

( details at link)

Weissmann's reputation precedes him. What a dirty loser.

[anatta]

^THIS!
They honed in on Flynn like a wolf on its prey. Glad Flynn's case will finally be heard. He's got a good lawyer, too.

Sidney Powell is ideal -she wrote a book on Weissman
"LICENSED TO LIE: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice"
https://www.amazon.com/Licensed-Lie-...31533420&psc=1

[dukkha]

Flynn is gonna walk