Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 42

Thread: Challenge to 12b. Damocles, Grind, Billy, ...

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default Challenge to 12b. Damocles, Grind, Billy, ...

    On a casual reading of this, I come away with the 'intent' that it is to stop any abusive use of 'pedophilia' as a means of degrading other Posters.
    'Pedophilia' being 'sex with a prepubescent child (usually understood at being under 12)'.

    Going back and re-reading the Rule, it mentions 'Minor', usually understood as being 'under 18'. I need a little clarification here. WHAT IS THE INTENT OF 12b???

    1.) 30 States in the U.S. have 16 as a legal and normal age to engage in sex.
    2.) The U.K. has 16 as a legal and normal age to engage in sex.
    3.) Canada has 16 as a legal and normal age to engage in sex.

    We have people here from Canada, Britain, and the 30 States. It seems awkward that a person could get Banned for engaging in what is legal. I don't think the 'intent' of 12b is to penalize people that reference 'teen sex', it seems reasonable that 12b is 'intended' for the actual meaning of the word 'pedophilia'.

    THIS IS A CHALLENGE FOR CLARIFICATION OF 12b AND WHAT IT ACTUALLY INTENDS.

  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    while you are at it get them to give a time limit on what is to long a time to go post in an "old" thread


    that isn't even written down as a rule

  3. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (08-20-2019)

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to evince For This Post:

    Jack (08-20-2019), Mason Michaels (08-20-2019)

  5. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  6. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (08-20-2019)

  7. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    while you are at it get them to give a time limit on what is to long a time to go post in an "old" thread


    that isn't even written down as a rule
    Thanks. One thing at a time. 12b is a little vague. Is the intent 'under 12', ... or 'under 18'?
    'under 12' is the 'pedophilia' reference that most people walk away with.

  8. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

  9. The Following User Groans At evince For This Awful Post:

    USFREEDOM911 (08-20-2019)

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    children who are not emancipated are minors


    that is the law
    The definition of 'Minors' is 'under 18'. Is THAT the intention of 12b? JPP Members here live in Canada, U.K., and 30 States that have a legal and protected '16 Legal Age of Consent' law. Is it the intention of JPP to ban people that engage in 'teen sex' that is legal?
    It would seem more logical to assume that JPP intentions are geared more at the 'pedophile' definition, prepubescent children, those under 12.
    Now that I have re-read 12b, I am challenging Damocles, Grind and Billy to delivery a more concise meaning of 12b: 'Under 12', or 'Under 18'. It shouldn't be too hard to define EXACTLY what is meant.

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    34,321
    Thanks
    3,498
    Thanked 11,601 Times in 9,273 Posts
    Groans
    632
    Groaned 1,405 Times in 1,371 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    The definition of 'Minors' is 'under 18'. Is THAT the intention of 12b? JPP Members here live in Canada, U.K., and 30 States that have a legal and protected '16 Legal Age of Consent' law. Is it the intention of JPP to ban people that engage in 'teen sex' that is legal?
    It would seem more logical to assume that JPP intentions are geared more at the 'pedophile' definition, prepubescent children, those under 12.
    Now that I have re-read 12b, I am challenging Damocles, Grind and Billy to delivery a more concise meaning of 12b: 'Under 12', or 'Under 18'. It shouldn't be too hard to define EXACTLY what is meant.
    If in doubt,stay as far away from 12 B situations.
    Think twice before posting,anything remotely near 12 B.
    AM I, I AM's,AM I.
    What day is Michaelmas on?

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mason Michaels For This Post:

    BRUTALITOPS (08-20-2019), Controlled Opposition (08-20-2019)

  13. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Delray Beach FL
    Posts
    114,996
    Thanks
    124,828
    Thanked 27,335 Times in 22,664 Posts
    Groans
    3,768
    Groaned 3,239 Times in 2,979 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    On a casual reading of this, I come away with the 'intent' that it is to stop any abusive use of 'pedophilia' as a means of degrading other Posters.
    'Pedophilia' being 'sex with a prepubescent child (usually understood at being under 12)'.

    Going back and re-reading the Rule, it mentions 'Minor', usually understood as being 'under 18'. I need a little clarification here. WHAT IS THE INTENT OF 12b???

    1.) 30 States in the U.S. have 16 as a legal and normal age to engage in sex.
    2.) The U.K. has 16 as a legal and normal age to engage in sex.
    3.) Canada has 16 as a legal and normal age to engage in sex.

    We have people here from Canada, Britain, and the 30 States. It seems awkward that a person could get Banned for engaging in what is legal. I don't think the 'intent' of 12b is to penalize people that reference 'teen sex', it seems reasonable that 12b is 'intended' for the actual meaning of the word 'pedophilia'.

    THIS IS A CHALLENGE FOR CLARIFICATION OF 12b AND WHAT IT ACTUALLY INTENDS.
    You fucking idiot. You need a reason for why references to pedophilia aren't permitted on the forum???? Kill yourself.
    "When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny."


    A lie doesn't become the truth, wrong doesn't become right, and evil doesn't become good just because it is accepted by a majority.
    Author: Booker T. Washington



    Quote Originally Posted by Nomad View Post
    Unless you just can't stand the idea of "ni**ers" teaching white kids.


    Quote Originally Posted by AProudLefty View Post
    Address the topic, not other posters.

  14. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    28,403
    Thanks
    26,104
    Thanked 11,856 Times in 8,415 Posts
    Groans
    18
    Groaned 2,290 Times in 2,172 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Crude insults and name calling seem to be the norm on this forum.

  15. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by evince View Post
    why do only I get tagged for that?


    because the right cant stand by what they said in the past


    it outs their evil
    fake news. we've closed lots of threads that were bumped by all types of people.

    we honestly don't care if someone does one here and there. it's when you spam them for no other reason to say "hey look at this"... you aren't contributing anything new or meaningful. you are just spamming.

    so in short, the line is "don't be a spaz"

    which in your case i know is something that is beyond comprehension for you. which is why you are so confused.


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BRUTALITOPS For This Post:

    canceled.2021.2 (08-21-2019), USFREEDOM911 (08-20-2019)

  17. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth Detector View Post
    You fucking idiot. You need a reason for why references to pedophilia aren't permitted on the forum???? Kill yourself.
    I did not reference, call, insinuate, or make mention of 'pedophilia' in any of my statements towards any person on JPP.

  18. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    On a casual reading of this, I come away with the 'intent' that it is to stop any abusive use of 'pedophilia' as a means of degrading other Posters.
    'Pedophilia' being 'sex with a prepubescent child (usually understood at being under 12)'.

    Going back and re-reading the Rule, it mentions 'Minor', usually understood as being 'under 18'. I need a little clarification here. WHAT IS THE INTENT OF 12b???

    1.) 30 States in the U.S. have 16 as a legal and normal age to engage in sex.
    2.) The U.K. has 16 as a legal and normal age to engage in sex.
    3.) Canada has 16 as a legal and normal age to engage in sex.

    We have people here from Canada, Britain, and the 30 States. It seems awkward that a person could get Banned for engaging in what is legal. I don't think the 'intent' of 12b is to penalize people that reference 'teen sex', it seems reasonable that 12b is 'intended' for the actual meaning of the word 'pedophilia'.

    THIS IS A CHALLENGE FOR CLARIFICATION OF 12b AND WHAT IT ACTUALLY INTENDS.
    I think our rule is pretty clear:

    We DO NOT want ANY mention in ANY context about suggesting encounters with another poster and a child, or with yourself and another poster's child, nor any mention of kids being sexually assaulted, sexually molested, raped, having people being called pedophiles, suggesting posters may have been molested as a kid, having vague references to any of the former, having a "clever" play on words with a wink and a nod that might suggest any of the former, any slight references, WE WANT NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF IT. Do not try to approach the line to test us to see what one can get away with, if you approach the line, chances are you will not receive the benefit of the doubt.

    in summation:

    - many posters always try to push the line and see what they can get away with. We tell people explicitly not to do this.
    - we do not give the benefit of the doubt. we don't look at situations and say "well it MIGHT be interpreted in another way." We are almost ALWAYS going to go with the worst interpretation.

    will your life on jpp really be so hard to not reference this stuff? because most people don't have an issue.

    Rule 12b means, do not flippantly talk about sexual stuff regarding minors. Period. End of conversation. If you do it, you open yourself up to being banned.

    I like you jack, but if you keep fucking up, you are going to get perma'd. next fuck up will be anywhere from a 60 day ban to a perma.

    As billy says, "don't fuck up"


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  19. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to BRUTALITOPS For This Post:

    canceled.2021.2 (08-21-2019), Truth Detector (08-21-2019), USFREEDOM911 (08-20-2019)

  20. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blissful Wizard View Post
    fake news. we've closed lots of threads that were bumped by all types of people.

    we honestly don't care if someone does one here and there. it's when you spam them for no other reason to say "hey look at this"... you aren't contributing anything new or meaningful. you are just spamming.

    so in short, the line is "don't be a spaz"

    which in your case i know is something that is beyond comprehension for you. which is why you are so confused.
    12b?

    'Under 12' ... or 'Under 18'?

  21. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    internet
    Posts
    39,189
    Thanks
    7,082
    Thanked 17,235 Times in 10,345 Posts
    Groans
    1,025
    Groaned 1,490 Times in 1,337 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    I did not reference, call, insinuate, or make mention of 'pedophilia' in any of my statements towards any person on JPP.
    you called someone "the Forum's 'Epstein' in the flesh."

    what do you think that implies?

    it was your 3rd time fucking up on this stuff. most people have been here for a decade and never have had an issue.

    don't compare people to pedophiles?

    it's like literally in our rule in black and white, and you're confused?


    ---

    Quote Originally Posted by Mott the Hoople View Post
    Grind is basically right
    Quote Originally Posted by Phantasmal View Post
    Grind’s got you beat by miles. He is very intelligent.

  22. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BRUTALITOPS For This Post:

    canceled.2021.2 (08-21-2019), Truth Detector (08-21-2019)

  23. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    47,509
    Thanks
    17,005
    Thanked 13,151 Times in 10,077 Posts
    Groans
    452
    Groaned 2,450 Times in 2,265 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blissful Wizard View Post
    I think our rule is pretty clear:



    in summation:

    - many posters always try to push the line and see what they can get away with. We tell people explicitly not to do this.
    - we do not give the benefit of the doubt. we don't look at situations and say "well it MIGHT be interpreted in another way." We are almost ALWAYS going to go with the worst interpretation.

    will your life on jpp really be so hard to not reference this stuff? because most people don't have an issue.

    Rule 12b means, do not flippantly talk about sexual stuff regarding minors. Period. End of conversation. If you do it, you open yourself up to being banned.

    I like you jack, but if you keep fucking up, you are going to get perma'd. next fuck up will be anywhere from a 60 day ban to a perma.

    As billy says, "don't fuck up"
    Thanks. I like you too.
    12b seems to conflate 'pedophile' and 'minor'. One being a 'prepubescent person', and the other being 'under 18'.
    Most of the World outlaws sex with 'prepubescent people'.
    On the other hand, most of the World has picked an arbitrary age for sex with 'Minors'.

Similar Threads

  1. Challenge to Damocles: ...
    By Jack in forum Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories Forum
    Replies: 109
    Last Post: 04-20-2019, 11:29 PM
  2. For Billy and Grind
    By USFREEDOM911 in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-08-2014, 01:52 AM
  3. For Grind and Billy
    By USFREEDOM911 in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-06-2014, 04:47 PM
  4. Another Poll for Grind and Billy to Mess With
    By Minister of Truth in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 05-24-2012, 11:35 PM
  5. Is Cap'n Billy Greater than Grind?
    By Mott the Hoople in forum Off Topic Forum
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-28-2010, 09:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •