Page 1 of 7 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 94

Thread: Andrew Yang Exposes Debates as 100% Rigged

  1. #1 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default Andrew Yang Exposes Debates as 100% Rigged


  2. #2 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    State of Bliss
    Posts
    31,007
    Thanks
    7,095
    Thanked 5,196 Times in 3,829 Posts
    Groans
    433
    Groaned 261 Times in 257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    Totally agree w/ Yang... Noticed it right off the bat in the first debates.. SOme of it is so chezzy, you would expect on a cheap 3rd world network....
    "There is no question former President Trump bears moral responsibility. His supporters stormed the Capitol because of the unhinged falsehoods he shouted into the world’s largest megaphone," McConnell wrote. "His behavior during and after the chaos was also unconscionable, from attacking Vice President Mike Pence during the riot to praising the criminals after it ended."



  3. #3 | Top
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    9,083
    Thanks
    2,345
    Thanked 3,121 Times in 2,441 Posts
    Groans
    200
    Groaned 265 Times in 242 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Indeed, rigged.
    The Truth Does Not Need To Be Supported With Censorship.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Evmetro For This Post:

    Truth Detector (08-19-2019)

  5. #4 | Top
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    In my house
    Posts
    21,174
    Thanks
    3,418
    Thanked 7,931 Times in 5,908 Posts
    Groans
    9
    Groaned 444 Times in 424 Posts
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Good for him.
    "Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." Joseph Stalin
    The USA has lost WWIV to China with no other weapons but China Virus and some cash to buy democrats.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Celticguy For This Post:

    Terri4Trump (08-18-2019)

  7. #5 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    4,196
    Thanks
    1,102
    Thanked 1,564 Times in 1,191 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 69 Times in 66 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Of course its rigged. They are Democrats. They are all pathological liars, crooks and pigs, and that includes Mr. Wang.

  8. The Following User Groans At Terri4Trump For This Awful Post:

    Gonzomin (08-19-2019)

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Terri4Trump For This Post:

    Truth Detector (08-19-2019)

  10. #6 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill View Post
    Totally agree w/ Yang... Noticed it right off the bat in the first debates.. SOme of it is so chezzy, you would expect on a cheap 3rd world network....
    They really need to get rid of the audience. It's so idiotic hearing them ask questions about who said what about who, then the audience cheers and boos like it's a wrestling show.

  11. #7 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Terri4Trump View Post
    Of course its rigged. They are Democrats. They are all pathological liars, crooks and pigs, and that includes Mr. Wang.
    Top NPC posting.

  12. #8 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    State of Bliss
    Posts
    31,007
    Thanks
    7,095
    Thanked 5,196 Times in 3,829 Posts
    Groans
    433
    Groaned 261 Times in 257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by StoneByStone View Post
    They really need to get rid of the audience. It's so idiotic hearing them ask questions about who said what about who, then the audience cheers and boos like it's a wrestling show.
    Yes, they serve no real purpose since they aren't suppose to be participating but the networks prob like it raising intrigue & suspense..
    "There is no question former President Trump bears moral responsibility. His supporters stormed the Capitol because of the unhinged falsehoods he shouted into the world’s largest megaphone," McConnell wrote. "His behavior during and after the chaos was also unconscionable, from attacking Vice President Mike Pence during the riot to praising the criminals after it ended."



  13. #9 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2019
    Posts
    4,196
    Thanks
    1,102
    Thanked 1,564 Times in 1,191 Posts
    Groans
    5
    Groaned 69 Times in 66 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Who gives a fuck which of the filthy degenerate Democrat pigs win. Trump will be reelected.

  14. #10 | Top
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Posts
    26,116
    Thanks
    694
    Thanked 5,043 Times in 3,907 Posts
    Groans
    85
    Groaned 1,697 Times in 1,555 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Terri4Trump View Post
    Who gives a fuck which of the filthy degenerate Democrat pigs win. Trump will be reelected.
    Not if Yang or Bernie get the nomination.

  15. #11 | Top
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    34,430
    Thanks
    23,941
    Thanked 19,095 Times in 13,072 Posts
    Groans
    0
    Groaned 5,908 Times in 5,169 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Well, it's commercialized.

    Contrived controversies are promulgated to pump up ratings.

    There's a big problem with using the TV format. It doesn't work very well for so many candidates. It's really hard to identify with so many candidates and keep up with who is where on which issue.

    I would love to see the candidates debate their positions in a well moderated online forum. No personal attacks. Just talking about the issues. Just the candidates could post, but everyone could read it. The public always has forums like this to discuss the candidate comments. That would create an easily searchable record of where they stand on each position.

    I am so tired of the loser mentality that believes the way to advance oneself is to attack somebody else. (win/lose) We need to elect somebody who will effectively deal with our national challenges. I want to hear how the candidates would deal with issues, not what dirt they can come up with on another candidate. The media is already tasked with bringing up dirt.

    The way forward for our nation lies in voting FOR people, not against somebody else.

    We need leaders who are good solution-creators. (win/win)

    We need to elect effective leaders and problem solvers, not critics.
    Personal Ignore Policy PIP: I like civil discourse. I will give you all the respect in the world if you respect me. Mouth off to me, or express overt racism, you will be PERMANENTLY Ignore Listed. Zero tolerance. No exceptions. I'll never read a word you write, even if quoted by another, nor respond to you, nor participate in your threads. ... Ignore the shallow. Cherish the thoughtful. Long Live Civil Discourse, Mutual Respect, and Good Debate! ps: Feel free to adopt my PIP. It works well.

  16. #12 | Top
    Join Date
    May 2019
    Posts
    6,560
    Thanks
    40
    Thanked 2,936 Times in 2,054 Posts
    Groans
    852
    Groaned 948 Times in 862 Posts

    Default

    They are not rigged. They have to damn many candidates to have a serious and informative debate. They will get better as we cull out those who are not gaining voters. Packman says we cannot get into substantive debates in short time periods. That is not because they are "fixed". It is because there are too damn many at this time. There is nothing revealing about that problem.
    It worked for Daffy in 2016. He is a showman and loves attention. So the debates were perfect for his shallow knowledge and ability to get headlines.

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Gonzomin For This Post:

    evince (08-19-2019)

  18. #13 | Top
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    State of Bliss
    Posts
    31,007
    Thanks
    7,095
    Thanked 5,196 Times in 3,829 Posts
    Groans
    433
    Groaned 261 Times in 257 Posts
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gonzomin View Post
    They are not rigged. They have to damn many candidates to have a serious and informative debate. They will get better as we cull out those who are not gaining voters. Packman says we cannot get into substantive debates in short time periods. That is not because they are "fixed". It is because there are too damn many at this time. There is nothing revealing about that problem.
    It worked for Daffy in 2016. He is a showman and loves attention. So the debates were perfect for his shallow knowledge and ability to get headlines.
    I think there is some truth to media interference. Just like in the over crowded gop race they put that SOB in the middle for what?? HE NEVER WON ANYTHING IN HIS FUCKIN LIFE & THE MEDIA DARLING, ONE OF THEIR OWN, IS PUT IN THE MIDDLE-for show. A fuckin farce if there ever was one........
    "There is no question former President Trump bears moral responsibility. His supporters stormed the Capitol because of the unhinged falsehoods he shouted into the world’s largest megaphone," McConnell wrote. "His behavior during and after the chaos was also unconscionable, from attacking Vice President Mike Pence during the riot to praising the criminals after it ended."



  19. #14 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    hmmmmm


    the racist Stone promotes some fucking internets asshole and you guys JUMP ON THR TRAIN???????



    hmmmmm


    jeeebus people wise up


    stone by stone wants a white America


    is pretending to be very left leaning


    russo bot hole folks


    don't believe a fucking thing stone says

  20. #15 | Top
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    183,528
    Thanks
    71,923
    Thanked 35,503 Times in 27,049 Posts
    Groans
    53
    Groaned 19,565 Times in 18,156 Posts
    Blog Entries
    16

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gonzomin View Post
    They are not rigged. They have to damn many candidates to have a serious and informative debate. They will get better as we cull out those who are not gaining voters. Packman says we cannot get into substantive debates in short time periods. That is not because they are "fixed". It is because there are too damn many at this time. There is nothing revealing about that problem.
    It worked for Daffy in 2016. He is a showman and loves attention. So the debates were perfect for his shallow knowledge and ability to get headlines.


    SPOT ON


    the russo bot holes are going to non stop promote idiot nobodies to convince the left that the left is evil and that translates inot giving up on voting


    WISE UP FOLKS

Similar Threads

  1. El Paso manifesto most closely aligns with Yang gang
    By tinfoil in forum Current Events Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-09-2019, 12:33 PM
  2. Anyone thought about Andrew Yang??
    By Bill in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 05-23-2019, 09:20 PM
  3. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 10-17-2016, 02:01 PM
  4. The Duopoly Debates Are Rigged!
    By Robo in forum General Politics Forum
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-28-2016, 07:14 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-29-2016, 09:59 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •