Bigdog (08-14-2019)
Bigdog (08-14-2019)
This is as bad as a Jarod thread...
Pathetic
Bigdog (08-14-2019), cancel2 2022 (08-14-2019), Earl (08-14-2019)
Recall China is a "developing nation" under current WTO rules -since that is impossible to work we have gone with a separate bi-lateral agreement.
What you should be doing is pressuring Pelosi for a vote on NAFTA 2 to show China we are serious and able to do ratification of a treaty with them
Earl (08-14-2019)
4,487
18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally
44 U.S.C. 2202 - The United States shall reserve and retain complete ownership, possession, and control of Presidential records; and such records shall be administered in accordance with the provisions of this chapter.
LOCK HIM UP!
Earl (08-14-2019)
Earl (08-14-2019)
Ok i'll cede the point China isn't paying -but so far in most cases the American consumer isn't either
Someone likely pointed out that holding off off on the durable/electronic goods tariffs for the holidays
helps our economy - but still leaves current sanctions on in the meantime, followed by those tariffs in Dec
Earl (08-14-2019)
What would Biden do??
Earl (08-14-2019)
China reported more signs of a weakening economy Wednesday, with high unemployment and lower production and investment markers,
Earl (08-14-2019)
China is not a status quo great power. A partial review of the evidence is its territorial expansion in the South China Sea, the pressure against India along their common border, the use of ‘debt trap diplomacy’ to exploit less developed states, support for the suppression of protesters in Hong Kong, who call attention to the PRC’s violation of the 1984 agreement with the UK and the gross human rights abuses against its Muslim minority in Xinjiang. All of which rightfully receive attention.
This shared future is certain to be dystopian. Any community that the CCP creates will be totalitarian and oppressive by its nature. Any shared future that it seeks to create will be one in which the rest of the world adapts to serve the interests of Beijing. The future will be shared only because China’s power is great enough to trap states into it either by seduction or coercion. It will be like Foxconn on a global scale. Beijing’s conception of global governance is a firm hierarchy with it on top. This shared future will be less free, less diverse, and far more oppressive than the present one.
https://spectator.us/america-china-h...tionary-power/
PoliTalker (08-14-2019)
Bookmarks